· Private foundation
Lieber Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VARIOUS MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES | $300,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.
11 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- VMVARIOUS MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES7× · 2018–2024 · $1.9M
- TSTOMCHEI SHABBOS5× · 2018–2022 · $106k
- IGIndividual grant recipient5× · 2018–2022 · $73k
Funded once
- CKCong Ktana of Waterburyone grant, 2022 · $50k
- CACong ahavas yisroelone grant, 2022 · $20k
- YEYAD ELIEZERone grant, 2021 · $12k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
An institution for higher learning and study of talmudic law for post high school students, and students returning from their studies in israel, where they can further their education.
Provide college level education and extensive background of jewish law and talmudic studies and rabbinical ordination.
A post-secondary school offering an educational program in talmudic study
Religious School
To maintain a school for hebrew religious and secular education.
Educating students in jewish religious studies and prayers.
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Kerem bais yaakov seminary is a religious institution with traditional values dedicated to advancing students in classical torah studies while establishing a torah outlook that students can apply to daily life. the curriculum enhances…
To operate a yeshiva (religious school)to promote and encourage the study of torah and other jewish works and teachings. to stimulate and foster the education and religious development of young jewish men of high school age. to provide a…
To provide religious Jewish education.
To cultivate students' intellectual, moral and creative capacities to the fullest by transmitting the necessary skills and methods that enable students to master all areas of torah scholarship.
To provide jewish vocational training to approximately 20 post high school students.
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Mkz Charity Foundation Inc · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Lieber Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lieber Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Bais Yaakov of Waterbury Inc: 4% of income from government
- Yeshiva Tiferes Boruch: 2% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Lieber Family’s filings →