Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lieber Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$54k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$57kYouth Development$56kArts & Culture$41kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kCivil Rights$38kRecreation & Sports$37kHuman Services$29kHealth$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$879k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAVINIA FESTIVAL$10,020
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$10,000
THE BRIGID ALLIANCE$10,000
JCFS RESPONSE FOR TEENS$10,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS$6,425
YOUTH SPORTS ALLIANCE$5,000
GLOBAL GOODS PARTNERS$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARCH FOURTH COALITION: $13k → 14%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $10k → 17%Share Our Spare: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
CT
CA
UT
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$246k · 9 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +253% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$246k
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+253%
+34%

Still filing today

67%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $26k · revenue +80%
  • BI
    BUILD INC
    2× · 2019–2021 · $20k · revenue +332%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +253%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $14k
  • AM
    Aftermath March Fourth Coalition
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $11k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
How to Build Up Inc

How to build up's (build up) global core team builds peace around the world by bringing together diverse skills: mediation, negotiation, facilitation, marketing, media, filmmaking, design, coding, data analysis, social media, and graphic…

Community Improvement
2
The Network Advocating Against Domestic Violence

The Network is a group of 40+ member organizations dedicated to improving the lives of those impacted by gender-based violence through education, public policy and advocacy, and connecting community members with direct service providers.…

Human Services
3
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
4
Our Generation Speaks Inc

Our mission is to create an entrepreneurial community of leaders to shape a more peaceful israeli-palestinian future built on trust.

Arts & Culture
5
The Conversationalist
6
Glaad Inc

Founded forty years ago, glaad is the world's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer ("lgbtq") media advocacy organization promoting and ensuring fair, accurate, and inclusive representation of people and issues across all…

7
Startout

Startout executes its mission and serves its beneficiaries through a full suite of programs critical to an entrepreneur's success, supported by an industry-leading online platform. programs to accelerate the success of startout…

8
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
9
Out & Equal

To provide leadership and professional development, education and research to create workplaces free from discrimination.

Social Science
10
Auschwitz Institute for the Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities

The auschwitz institute for the prevention of genocide and mass atrocities is dedicated to building a world that prevents genocide. we aim to see every state effectively integrate within government the domestically developed function of…

International
11
Global Philanthropy Project Inc

Global Philanthropy Project (GPP or the Organization) is a collaboration of funders and philanthropic advisors working to expand global philanthropic support to advance the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex…

Philanthropy
12
Women Action & the Media Corp

Gender equity in media access, representation, employment and ownership and a world in which a just media is considered essential to a just society. women, action & the media (wam) connects and supports media makers, activists, academics…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Build Inc and the most unlike its peers is Aftermath March Fourth Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RESPONSE CENTER — $40,000 · OtherRESPONSE CENTERYOUTH SPORTS ALLIANCE — $37,000 · OtherYOUTH SPORTS ALLIANCENATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS — $21,236 · OtherNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSISBUILD INC — $20,000 · OtherBUILD INCIndividual grant recipient — $14,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJCFS RESPONSE FOR TEENS — $10,000 · OtherJCFS RESPONSE FOR TEENSIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+3 more — $10,500 · Other+3 moreGLOBAL GOODS PARTNERS INC — $54,000 · InternationalGLOBAL GOODS PAR…RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $26,170 · Arts & CultureRAVINIA FEST…RADIO WORKSHOP US INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureRADIO WORKSH…Chicago Symphony Orchestra — $5,000 · Arts & CultureChicago Symp…ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $20,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMA…GUNSDOWN INC — $17,500 · Civil RightsGUNSDOWN IN…Aftermath March Fourth Coalition — $12,500 · Human ServicesTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesShare our Spare — $6,000 · Human ServicesEXPERIENCE CAMPS — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $10,000 · PhilanthropyHighland Park Community Foundation — $7,500 · PhilanthropyBUSINESSES UNITED IN INVESTING LENDING & DEVELOPMENT — $6,000 · Community Improvement
Other$173,936International$54,000Arts & Culture$41,170Civil Rights$37,500Human Services$28,500Youth Development$20,000Philanthropy$17,500Community Improvement$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGLOBAL GOODS PARTNERS INC — $54,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $26,170 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBUILD INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUNSDOWN INC — $17,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetEXPERIENCE CAMPS — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRADIO WORKSHOP US INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHighland Park Community Foundation — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetShare our Spare — $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBUSINESSES UNITED IN INVESTING LENDING & DEVELOPMENT — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lieber Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lieber Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Lieber Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph