Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lichterman Loewenberg Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$295k
Granted FY2024still arriving
44
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$52k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

93% of Lichterman Loewenberg Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of Greater Memphis Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 17 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Lichterman Loewenberg Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 26 organizations, $295k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

28
’17
33
’18
33
’19
31
’20
27
’21
25
’22
28
’23
26
’24
17
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$576kEducation$320kHuman Services$315kArts & Culture$260kHealth$167kEnvironment$107kReligion$66kYouth Development$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k35 grants · $116k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $102k
$3,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$56k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION$52,000
NATIONAL ORNAMENTAL MUSEUM$50,000
WOMEN'S FOUNDATION FOR A GREATER MEMPHIS$15,000
WOLF RIVER CONSERVANCY$12,500
EXCEL CENTER$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MEMPHIS$10,000
CARPENTER ART GARDEN$10,000
A STEP AHEAD FOUNDATION$10,000
MIFA$10,000
EMMANUEL CENTER$8,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF MEMPHIS$7,500
ARTS MEMPHIS$7,500
FACING HISTORY AND OURSELVES$7,500
MADONNA LEARNING CENTER$7,000
HARDWOOD CENTER$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAMBODIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE: $1k → 8%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION FOR A GREATER MEMPHIS: $15k → 17%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION FOR A GREATER MEMPHIS: $15k → 17%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION FOR A GREATER MEMPHIS: $15k → 17%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION FOR GREATER MEMP: $10k → 17%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION FOR GREATER MEMP: $10k → 17%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION FOR GREATER MEMP: $6k → 17%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION FOR GREATER MEMP: $5k → 17%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION FOR GREATER MEMP: $5k → 17%LAST HOUSE ON THE ROCK: $5k → 17%LAST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK: $4k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WEST TENNESSE: $10k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WEST TENNESSE: $4k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WEST TENNESSE: $4k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WEST TENNESSE: $3k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WEST TENNESSE: $2k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WEST TENNESSE: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
UT
MO
VA
TN
NC
MS
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 71 repeat orgs$124k to everyone else

71 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

71
26

Total granted

$2.0M
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+43%

Still filing today

56%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2025 · $398k · revenue +227%
  • MJ
    MEMPHIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    5× · 2017–2021 · $170k · revenue +3%
  • WF
    WOMEN'S FOUNDATION FOR A GREATER MEMPHIS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $81k · revenue +256%

Funded once

  • LN
    LICTHERMAN NATURE CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • LH
    LAST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
  • ML
    MEMPHIS LIBRARY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +95%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memphis Tomorrow

Memphis tomorrow is an association of ceos of memphis' largest businesses working to promote opportunity and quality of life for all memphians through collective action and public-private partnerships.

Community Improvement
2
Memphis Area Chamber of Commerce

To serve our members and partners by improving the quality of life through regional economic prosperity.

—
3
Theatre Memphis

To produce plays and encourage the arts by performance and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
4
One Family Memphis
Human Services
5
The Urbanart Commission

The mission of the urbanart commission is to create opportunities for artists and neighborhoods to connect and shape spaces through public art.

Arts & Culture
6
The Meadows Housing Corporation Inc

To provide housing and services to low, very low, and extremely low income families.

Housing & Shelter
7
Children's Foundation of Memphis
Health
8
Memphis Center City Development Corporation

Assist private development projects

—
9
Memphis Zoological Society

The memphis zoological society is building one of the world's great zoos in memphis. our staff and volunteers are dedicated to providing a naturalistic and enriching sanctuary for our animals and a clean, friendly, entertaining, and…

Animals
10
Memphis Academy of Science and Engineeri

To produce lifelong learners, critical thinkers, effective communicators, and productive members of the global community

Education
11
Memphis Area Association of Realtors Benevolent Fund
Philanthropy
12
Memphis Education Fund Inc

To work in partnership with the shelby county school district and the achievement school district on strategies that support school improvement, development, and implementation of initiatives focused on increasing k-12 educational outcomes…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Museum of Memphis Inc; the most unlike its peers is Last House On the Block. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/56
Grantees still filing
41/56
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MEMPHIS INC: $5,975,983 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MEMPHIS INCMEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $534,500 · PhilanthropyMEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION+3 more: $10,950 · PhilanthropyMEMPHIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $170,000 · OtherMEMPHIS JEWIS…NATIONAL ORNAMENTAL MUSEUM: $100,000 · OtherNATIONAL ORNA…HARWOOD CENTER INC: $76,000 · OtherHARWOOD CENTE…MEMPHIS JEWISH FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherMEMPHIS JEWIS…A STEP AHEAD: $46,300 · OtherLOEWENBERG COLLEGE OF NURSING: $35,000 · Other+68 more: $530,463 · Other+68 moreUNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS FOUNDATION: $398,000 · EducationMADONNA LEARNING CENTER INCORPORATED: $48,000 · EducationCARPENTER ART GARDEN: $46,500 · EducationRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $18,700 · Education+5 more: $18,300 · EducationMEMPHIS MUSEUMS OF SCIENCE & HISTORY: $48,827 · Arts & CultureARTSMEMPHIS: $37,850 · Arts & CultureTHE OVERTON PARK SHELL INC: $35,150 · Arts & CultureRandall Museum Friends: $26,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MEMPHIS INC: $21,250 · Arts & CultureFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $14,934 · Arts & CultureINDIE MEMPHIS: $14,250 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $3,000 · Arts & CultureWOMEN'S FOUNDATION FOR A GREATER MEMPHIS: $81,000 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Inter-Faith Association: $35,000 · Human ServicesA STEP AHEAD FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WEST TENNESSEE INC: $23,500 · Human ServicesLAST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK: $9,000 · Human Services+2 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesWOLF RIVER CONSERVANCY INC: $73,000 · EnvironmentProtect Our Aquifer: $5,000 · Environment+1 more: $1,000 · EnvironmentEMMANUEL CENTER INC: $64,000 · Religion
Philanthropy$6,521,433Other$1,017,763Education$529,500Arts & Culture$201,261Human Services$183,500Environment$79,000Religion$64,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MEMPHIS INC: $5,975,983 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetMEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $534,500 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS FOUNDATION: $398,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMEMPHIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $170,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN'S FOUNDATION FOR A GREATER MEMPHIS: $81,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHARWOOD CENTER INC: $76,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetWOLF RIVER CONSERVANCY INC: $73,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetEMMANUEL CENTER INC: $64,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetMEMPHIS MUSEUMS OF SCIENCE & HISTORY: $48,827 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMADONNA LEARNING CENTER INCORPORATED: $48,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCARPENTER ART GARDEN: $46,500 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetARTSMEMPHIS: $37,850 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE OVERTON PARK SHELL INC: $35,150 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMetropolitan Inter-Faith Association: $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMIFA CORPORATION: $30,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetA STEP AHEAD FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetRandall Museum Friends: $26,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetMEMPHIS RIVER PARKS PARTNERSHIP INC: $25,850 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WEST TENNESSEE INC: $23,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MEMPHIS INC: $21,250 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK: $20,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB): $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC: $19,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $18,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER MEMPHIS: $17,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $14,934 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINDIE MEMPHIS: $14,250 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetHabitat for Humanity: $10,750 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF THE SOUTH: $10,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEMPHIS LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $8,300 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOR THE KINGDOM INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetEAST PALO ALTO KIDS FOUNDATION: $6,750 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFriends of the Memphis Public Library: $6,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE ARC MID-SOUTH: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetProtect Our Aquifer: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE LAST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCALVARY RESCUE MISSION: $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBinghampton Development Corporation: $3,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSLINGSHOT MEMPHIS INC: $2,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetADVOCATES FOR IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY CAMP INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWINGS OVER MEMPHIS INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY LIFT CORP: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC 558 CHICKASAW COUNCIL: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIDLEWILD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $1,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNOE VALLEY CHAMBER MUSIC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAll Five: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MEMPHIS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S FOUNDATION FOR A GREATER MEMPHIS ↗
  • Who funds HARWOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WOLF RIVER CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds EMMANUEL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS MUSEUMS OF SCIENCE & HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds MADONNA LEARNING CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CARPENTER ART GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds ARTSMEMPHIS ↗
  • Who funds THE OVERTON PARK SHELL INC ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Inter-Faith Association ↗
  • Who funds MIFA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds A STEP AHEAD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Randall Museum Friends ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS RIVER PARKS PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WEST TENNESSEE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MEMPHIS INC ↗
  • Who funds MID-SOUTH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds B'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB) ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC ↗
  • Who funds RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER MEMPHIS ↗
  • Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIE MEMPHIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater Memphis IncTN58.3× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · The Kemmons Wilson Family Foundation · Jr Hyde III Family Foundation · Plough Foundation · Thomas W Briggs Foundation Inc · United Way of the Mid South · The Assisi Foundation of Memphis Inc · The Goldsmith Family Foundation Inc · Self Foundation · Speer Charitable Trust · The Urban Child Institute

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lichterman Loewenberg Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lichterman Loewenberg Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lichterman Loewenberg Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lichterman Loewenberg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 109 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lichterman Loewenberg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph