Skip to content

· Community foundation

Liberty Hill Foundation

Liberty hill is a laboratory for social change philanthropy.

$22M
Granted FY2025still arriving
750
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$568k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$14MHousing & Shelter$13MCivil Rights$11MCommunity Improvement$9.0MHuman Services$8.6MCrime & Legal$6.7MYouth Development$5.0MEducation$4.4MOther$0
02FY2025 · 750 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 750 grants below total $21,351,425, the rows itemized in this filing. The $21,821,817 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $470,392 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k330 grants · $1.0M
  • $10k–50k286 grants · $4.9M
  • $50k–250k126 grants · $13M
  • $250k+8 grants · $2.7M
$10,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATALYST CALIFORNIA$568,080
SIFF$500,000
RACIAL JUSTICE COALITION OF ASHEVILLE INC$300,000
SOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE INC$273,671
SOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE INC$262,119
SAJE (STRATEGIC ACTIONS FOR A JUST ECONOMY)$250,000
CITY OF HOPE$250,000
YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER$250,000
CALIFORNIA INDIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ALLIANCE$200,000
SPIRIT AWAKENING FOUNDATION$190,000
SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS$180,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS$180,000
EQUALITY ALLIANCE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY$175,000
ONE ARIZONA$150,000
NEW VILLAGE GIRLS ACADEMY$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $13.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALIENTO EDUCATION FUND: $100k → 11%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $250k → 10%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $150k → 10%PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY: $100k → 11%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $100k → 10%PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY: $100k → 11%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CEN: $80k → 10%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $80k → 10%TODEC LEGAL CENTER PERRIS: $189k → 11%TODEC LEGAL CENTER PERRIS: $107k → 11%NILE SISTERS DEVELOPMENT INITATIVE: $150k → 11%SOMALI BANTU ASSOCIATION: $150k → 11%SOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $100k → 11%SOMALI BANTU ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $100k → 11%POWERFUL VOICES: $125k → 9%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $125k → 9%CHIRLA ACTION FUND: $80k → 14%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $125k → 9%EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $125k → 9%KANDELIA: $125k → 9%LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY GARDEN COUNCIL: $270k → 14%LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY GARDEN COUNCIL: $257k → 14%LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY GARDEN COUNCIL: $200k → 14%LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY GARDEN COUNCIL: $85k → 14%SANCTUARY OF HOPE: $80k → 14%FREEFROM: $100k → 14%SOUTHEAST ASIAN COMMUNITY: $95k → 14%STRATEGIC CONCEPTS IN ORG: $134k → 14%STRATEGIC CONCEPTS IN ORGANIZING & POLICY EDUCATION: $101k → 14%INNERCITY STRUGGLE: $150k → 14%INNERCITY STRUGGLE: $89k → 14%JOVENES INC (YOUNG PEOP: $80k → 14%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC: $100k → 14%BROTHERS SONS SELVES: $245k → 14%INNERCITY STRUGGLE: $223k → 14%INNERCITY STRUGGLE: $100k → 14%INNERCITY STRUGGLE: $80k → 14%INNERCITY STRUGGLE: $80k → 14%GARMENT WORKER CENTER: $226k → 14%GARMENT WORKER CENTER: $133k → 14%GARMENT WORKER CENTER: $125k → 14%GARMENT WORKER CENTER: $100k → 14%UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN IN: $96k → 14%UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT: $93k → 14%UFCW LOCAL 770 ICAZA FOUNDATION: $125k → 14%UFCW LOCAL 770 ICAZA FOUN: $113k → 14%ACCE ACTION: $80k → 14%THAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN: $113k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$96M · 559 repeat orgs$13M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

559 repeat relationships: 218 still active in FY2025, 341 since wound down; 127 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

559
435

Total granted

$96M
$4.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+13%

Still filing today

95%
87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationCivil RightsEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +266%
  • EY
    EAST YARD COMMUNITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +151% · 33% of their budget
  • LF
    LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • MV
    MILLION VOTERS PROJECT ACTION FUND FOR SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES FIRSTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $300k · revenue +386%
  • OO
    OFFICE OF PEOPLE
    one grant, 2024 · $250k · revenue 0%
  • WO
    WONDER OF WOMEN INTERNATIONAL PC
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue -16% · 40% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Cooperation L a

The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.

Arts & Culture
3
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
4
Latino Media Collaborative

Latino Media Collaborative's mission is to leverage the power of Latino and community news media to impact policy, change narratives, and promote civic engagement, while also supporting advancement of the sector through capacity building,…

Arts & Culture
5
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
6
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
7
California Center for Movement Legal Services

The California Center for Movement Legal Services (Movement Legal) provides legal services in the pursuit of improving the lives of California's traditionally underserved residents, carrying out legal work that fosters community led policy…

Crime & Legal
8
California Environmental Justice Alliance

Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…

Environment
9
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
10
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
11
League of Women Voters of Los Angeles

The League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and…

—
12
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadersup; the most unlike its peers is Partch Ensemble. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

1088 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1088 of the 1,153 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

43
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
336
Early backer (in before they grew)
1060/1088
Grantees still filing
699/1088
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INNERCITY STRUGGLE: $1,715,745 · Human ServicesINNERCITY STRUGG…Garment Worker Center: $1,400,250 · Human ServicesGarment Worker C…LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY GARDEN COUNCIL: $992,102 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES COMM…Strategic Concepts In Organizing & Policy Education: $891,699 · Human ServicesStrategic Concep…YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $858,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S FR…Somali Bantu Association of America: $700,000 · Human ServicesSomali Bantu Ass…PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY: $493,333 · Human ServicesJUSTICE FOR GIRLS COALITION OF WASHINGTON STATE: $450,000 · Human Services+23 more: $5,577,497 · Human Services+23 moreEAST YARD COMMUNITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: $2,635,195 · OtherEAST YARD COMMUNITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTIC…LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $2,005,051 · OtherLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATIONSAJE: $1,663,240 · Other+89 more: $30,504,386 · Other+89 moreCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $2,942,544 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PAR…KOREAN IMMIGRANT WORKERS ADVOCATES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,556,300 · Community ImprovementKOREAN IMMIGR…CANGRESS DBA LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $1,175,085 · Community ImprovementCANGRESS DBA …COMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT: $765,850 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY COA…People Organized For Westside Renewal POWER: $625,857 · Community ImprovementPeople Organi…PILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN: $483,500 · Community ImprovementLATINO AND LATINA ROUNTABLE OF THE SAN GABRIEL & POMONA VALLEYS: $437,900 · Community Improvement+11 more: $2,533,941 · Community Improvement+11 moreSOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE: $1,951,354 · Housing & ShelterSOCIAL JUST…TENEMOS QUE RECLAMAR Y UNIDOS SALVAR LA TIERRA-SOUTH LA: $1,711,487 · Housing & ShelterTENEMOS QUE…LOS ANGELES CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LAW AND ACTION: $732,187 · Housing & ShelterLOS ANGELES…LOPEZ COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $650,000 · Housing & ShelterLOPEZ COMMU…ESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION: $561,027 · Housing & ShelterESPERANZA C…LIBERTY COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $395,515 · Housing & ShelterFIDEICOMISO COMUNITARIO TIERRA LIBRE: $394,015 · Housing & ShelterEL SERENO COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $391,515 · Housing & ShelterBEVERLY-VERMONT COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $389,015 · Housing & ShelterAFRICAN COMMUNITY HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT: $375,000 · Housing & ShelterMason County Housing Options for Students in Transition: $375,000 · Housing & ShelterAFRICATOWN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $375,000 · Housing & Shelter+5 more: $899,000 · Housing & Shelter+5 moreSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $1,983,865 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND…COMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT: $1,635,825 · EnvironmentCOMMUNITIE…PACOIMA BEAUTIFUL: $1,149,964 · EnvironmentPACOIMA BE…Greenaction for Health and Environmental Justice: $600,000 · EnvironmentGreenactio…Hanford Challenge Corporation: $575,000 · EnvironmentHanford Ch…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $513,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RE…Duwamish River Cleanup Coalition - TAG: $425,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL LAW & POLICY: $375,000 · EnvironmentAmah Mutsun Land Trust: $375,000 · EnvironmentCALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL VOTERS EDUCATION FUND: $290,000 · Environment+2 more: $481,513 · Environment+2 moreCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $911,600 · Civil RightsCOLECTIVA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO: $600,000 · Civil RightsFilipino Migrant Center: $578,000 · Civil RightsCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $508,050 · Civil RightsRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE: $449,553 · Civil RightsGenders & Sexualities Alliance Network DBA GSA Network: $380,100 · Civil RightsACLU FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $310,750 · Civil RightsRacial Justice Coalition of Asheville Inc: $300,000 · Civil RightsMILLION VOTERS PROJECT ACTION FUND FOR SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES FIRST: $300,000 · Civil RightsDISABILITY RIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $251,000 · Civil RightsMOVEMENT ADVANCEMENT PROJECT: $210,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK: $209,000 · Civil Rights+8 more: $1,244,601 · Civil RightsRedeemer Community Partnership: $1,296,776 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH JUSTICE COALITION INC: $1,280,002 · Youth DevelopmentKHMER GIRLS IN ACTION: $1,085,433 · Youth DevelopmentACTA NON VERBA YOUTH URBAN FARM PROJECT: $600,000 · Youth DevelopmentSIFF: $500,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHOOSE 180: $350,000 · Youth DevelopmentSPIRIT AWAKENING FOUNDATION: $235,000 · Youth Development+3 more: $425,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$13,078,626Other$36,807,872Community Improvement$10,520,977Housing & Shelter$9,200,115Environment$8,404,167Civil Rights$6,252,654Youth Development$5,772,211

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $2,942,544 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetEAST YARD COMMUNITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: $2,635,195 over 9y, 33% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $2,005,051 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $1,983,865 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE: $1,951,354 over 9y, 11% of budgetINNERCITY STRUGGLE: $1,715,745 over 9y, 11% of budgetTENEMOS QUE RECLAMAR Y UNIDOS SALVAR LA TIERRA-SOUTH LA: $1,711,487 over 9y, 27% of budgetSAJE: $1,663,240 over 9y, 12% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT: $1,635,825 over 9y, 6.7% of budgetKOREAN IMMIGRANT WORKERS ADVOCATES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,556,300 over 9y, 9.7% of budgetGarment Worker Center: $1,400,250 over 9y, 38% of budgetRedeemer Community Partnership: $1,296,776 over 9y, 98% of budgetYOUTH JUSTICE COALITION INC: $1,280,002 over 9y, 17% of budgetCANGRESS DBA LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $1,175,085 over 9y, 16% of budgetPACOIMA BEAUTIFUL: $1,149,964 over 9y, 13% of budgetACCE Institute: $1,143,621 over 9y, 6.4% of budgetKHMER GIRLS IN ACTION: $1,085,433 over 9y, 11% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $998,540 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES COMMUNITY GARDEN COUNCIL: $992,102 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $955,600 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $911,600 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetStrategic Concepts In Organizing & Policy Education: $891,699 over 9y, 9.8% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $858,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetPHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: $799,511 over 9y, 9.8% of budgetCATALYST CALIFORNIA: $790,600 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT: $765,850 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetThe Sequoyah Educational Center: $762,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LAW AND ACTION: $732,187 over 8y, 41% of budgetSomali Bantu Association of America: $700,000 over 7y, 22% of budgetZero Waste Washington: $650,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetTHE VILLAGE METHOD: $650,000 over 8y, 34% of budgetCalifornia Indian Environmental Alliance: $650,000 over 7y, 9.2% of budgetFREEDOM EDUCATION PROJECT PUGET SOUND: $650,000 over 8y, 21% of budgetLOPEZ COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $650,000 over 8y, 9.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES BROTHERHOOD CRUSADE - BLACK UNITED FUND INC: $631,026 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetPeople Organized For Westside Renewal POWER: $625,857 over 7y, 40% of budgetLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $618,011 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetGENTE ORGANIZADA: $607,500 over 9y, 33% of budgetGreenaction for Health and Environmental Justice: $600,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetCOLECTIVA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO: $600,000 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetACTA NON VERBA YOUTH URBAN FARM PROJECT: $600,000 over 8y, 22% of budgetFilipino Migrant Center: $578,000 over 7y, 20% of budgetHelping Link: $575,000 over 7y, 35% of budgetHanford Challenge Corporation: $575,000 over 7y, 15% of budgetESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION: $561,027 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetPOMONA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CENTER: $554,119 over 9y, 8.6% of budgetInquilinos Unidos: $542,857 over 7y, 73% of budgetUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES AND EDUCATION INC: $525,000 over 6y, 52% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds EAST YARD COMMUNITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds INNERCITY STRUGGLE ↗
  • Who funds TENEMOS QUE RECLAMAR Y UNIDOS SALVAR LA TIERRA-SOUTH LA ↗
  • Who funds SAJE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN IMMIGRANT WORKERS ADVOCATES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds Garment Worker Center ↗
  • Who funds Redeemer Community Partnership ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH JUSTICE COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds CANGRESS DBA LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds PACOIMA BEAUTIFUL ↗
  • Who funds ACCE Institute ↗
  • Who funds KHMER GIRLS IN ACTION ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY GARDEN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Strategic Concepts In Organizing & Policy Education ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ↗
  • Who funds CATALYST CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT ↗
  • Who funds The Sequoyah Educational Center ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LAW AND ACTION ↗
  • Who funds Somali Bantu Association of America ↗
  • Who funds Zero Waste Washington ↗
  • Who funds THE VILLAGE METHOD ↗
  • Who funds California Indian Environmental Alliance ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM EDUCATION PROJECT PUGET SOUND ↗
  • Who funds LOPEZ COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES BROTHERHOOD CRUSADE - BLACK UNITED FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds People Organized For Westside Renewal POWER ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY ↗
  • Who funds GENTE ORGANIZADA ↗
  • Who funds Greenaction for Health and Environmental Justice ↗
  • Who funds COLECTIVA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Weingart FoundationCA158.4× affinity197 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Weingart Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The California Endowment · The California Wellness Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · United Way Inc · The Ahmanson Foundation · Durfee Foundation · Roy and Patricia Disney Family Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · California Community Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Liberty Hill Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Liberty Hill Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    84report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1153 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Liberty Hill’s filings →

    More from the funding graph