Skip to content
Liautaud Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Liautaud Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$4.4MHuman Services$1.4MHealth$1.3MAnimals$1.3MYouth Development$1.2MEnvironment$525kRecreation & Sports$332kPublic Benefit$210kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HORATIO ALGER ASSOCIATION$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMP SOUTHERN GROUND: $250k → 6%CHARITY WATER: $25k → 17%CAMP SOUTHERN GROUND: $77k → 6%CAMP SOUTHERN GROUND INC: $492k → 6%CAMP SOUTHERN GROUND INC: $349k → 6%CAMP SOUTHERN GROUND INC: $199k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
WI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
DE
AZ
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Liautaud Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 19% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 10%.

Liautaud Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.8M · 16 repeat orgs$4.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
36

Total granted

$6.8M
$4.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+29%

Still filing today

88%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $500k · revenue +6%
  • CN
    CRISIS NURSERY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $315k · revenue +41%
  • Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
    3× · 2018–2020 · $300k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • BA
    Brewster Academygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue +34%
  • YG
    Youth Guidancegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue +121%
  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC
    one grant, 2017 · $500k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
5
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
6
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
7
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
8
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
9
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kansas City Chapter Safari Club International Charitable Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/40
Grantees still filing
31/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC: $1,381,858 · EducationHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INCBrewster Academy: $1,003,302 · EducationBrewster AcademyYouth Guidance: $1,000,000 · EducationYouth GuidanceJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY: $1,000,000 · EducationJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITYTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $500,000 · EducationTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION+3 more: $249,957 · EducationMAYO CLINIC: $500,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICDUCKS UNLIMITED INC: $382,047 · OtherDUCKS UNLIMITED INCCRISIS NURSERY: $315,000 · OtherCRISIS NURSERYLURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $300,492 · OtherLURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALTURNING POINT USA INC: $200,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $161,678 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS F…AMERICA'S CHARITIES: $97,817 · Other+21 more: $491,207 · Other+21 moreCAMP SOUTHERN GROUND INC: $1,367,089 · Human ServicesCAMP SOUTHERN …+1 more: $25,203 · Human ServicesMULE DEER FOUNDATION: $498,670 · AnimalsMULE DEER …SPORTSMEN FOR FISH & WILDLIFE INC: $224,796 · AnimalsSPORTSMEN …Eco Defense Group: $150,000 · AnimalsEco Defens…FARM WAY SANCTUARY INC: $98,567 · AnimalsFARM WAY S…+1 more: $25,101 · AnimalsAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $300,378 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $125,544 · Health+1 more: $10,014 · HealthHARPETH CONSERVANCY: $250,000 · EnvironmentTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · EnvironmentALL IN ALL THE TIME: $100,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FERRARI FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyBREES DREAM FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $7,500 · Philanthropy
Education$5,135,117Other$2,448,241Human Services$1,392,292Animals$997,134Health$435,936Environment$375,000Philanthropy$232,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC: $1,381,858 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetCAMP SOUTHERN GROUND INC: $1,367,089 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetBrewster Academy: $1,003,302 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetYouth Guidance: $1,000,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY: $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMULE DEER FOUNDATION: $498,670 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCRISIS NURSERY: $315,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $300,378 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHARPETH CONSERVANCY: $250,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetSPORTSMEN FOR FISH & WILDLIFE INC: $224,796 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $161,678 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEco Defense Group: $150,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $125,544 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRINITY SCHOOLS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE FERRARI FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFARM WAY SANCTUARY INC: $98,567 over 4y, 50% of budgetAMERICA'S CHARITIES: $97,817 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $26,037 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInstitute for Humane Studies: $25,512 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $25,203 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BONOBOS: $25,101 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREES DREAM FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $24,957 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $10,014 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeal Legacy Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKW CHAMPAIGN CARES: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Goldman Sachs Cha…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Shell USA Company Fou…American Endowment Fo…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Natl Christian Charit…
Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY12.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Liautaud Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Liautaud Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Liautaud Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home