Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Liaou Foundation Aka Sunny Hills Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$63k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Religion$100kEducation$53kArts & Culture$14kFood & Nutrition$7kYouth Development$5kPublic Benefit$5kHuman Services$2kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $53k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST PROGRESS SOC$25,603
BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION$15,000
TAIWAN CENTER FOUNDATION OF GREATER LOS$12,000
TCCNA FOUNDATION$5,000
SINO AMERICAN BUDDHIST CULTURAL CENTER$2,000
INLAND EMPIRE FUTURE LEADERS$2,000
SOCAL TAIWANESE AMERICAN EMERGENCY ASSIS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ASSISSTANCE LEAGUE OF SAN BERNARDINO: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$90k · 4 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$90k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+18%

Still filing today

75%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SINO AMERICAN BUDDHIST CULTURAL CENTER INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $51k · revenue +19%
  • BT
    BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $21k
  • TC
    TAIWAN CENTER FOUNDATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $13k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • CP
    CAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $26k · revenue +82%
  • CP
    CAL POLY POMONA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $26k · revenue +199%
  • DL
    DDMBA LA Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pho Da Son Quan Am Bo Tat Tu Inc

A buddhist temple provides religious services on various occasions, conventions and publications.to enrich members' spriitual life.

2
Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation

To provide patient-centered medical care with compassion to underpriviledged individuals regardless of religion, age, gender, ethnicity or ability to pay.

International
3
Tu Lam Buddhist Temple

The organization provides a worshipping place for the buddhists. The public can come to attend masses, meditations and worship Buddha.

Religion
4
Thanh Tu Meditation Center

Buddhism encourages its people to avoid self-indulgence but also self-denial.

Religion
5
Los Angeles Chong De Culture and Education Foundation

To promote spirituality cultural awareness and education, to provide guidance to people for the restoration of the true nature, to advocate morality, benevolence and righteousness.

Religion
6
Fu Yuan Buddhist Center of America

Buddhist Temple

Religion
7
Taiwanese-American Foundation of San Diego

To engage in chratable educational and community activities that promote culture and tradition in the community, and promote the health and social well-being of the communities.

Arts & Culture
8
San Fernando Valley Chinese Cultural Association

The san fernando valley chinese cultural association (sfvcca) is a non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to the preservation and celebration of the splendors of chinese civilization. sfvcca is deeply committed to promoting nutual…

Arts & Culture
9
Giac Hanh Buddhist Center
Religion
10
Chinese University Alumni Association of Southern California Center for Edu
Education
11
Uc Chinese Alumni Foundation
12
Vietnamese Buddhist Association Central Valley

provide buddhist service for community

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Taiwan Center Foundation of Greater Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is Sino American Buddhist Cultural Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SINO AMERICAN BUDDHIST CULTURAL CENTER INC — $51,350 · OtherSINO AMERICAN BUDDHIST CULTURAL CENTER INCINTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST PROGRESS SOC — $25,603 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST PROGRESS SOCHELPING HANDS PANTRY — $4,500 · Other+7 more — $10,000 · Other+7 moreCAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION INC — $26,250 · EducationCAL POLY POMONA…CAL POLY POMONA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $26,250 · PhilanthropyCAL POLY POMONA…BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION — $21,000 · ReligionBUDDHIST TZU C…DDMBA LA Foundation — $2,500 · ReligionDDMBA LA Found…TAIWAN CENTER FOUNDATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $13,000 · Arts & CultureTCCNA — $5,000 · Public BenefitFormosan Association for Public Affairs — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentAssistance League of San Bernardino — $1,000 · Human Services
Other$91,453Education$26,250Philanthropy$26,250Religion$23,500Arts & Culture$13,000Public Benefit$5,000Youth Development$2,000Human Services$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSINO AMERICAN BUDDHIST CULTURAL CENTER INC — $51,350 over 3y, 11% of budgetCAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION INC — $26,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAL POLY POMONA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $26,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTAIWAN CENTER FOUNDATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $13,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTCCNA — $5,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetDDMBA LA Foundation — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOPTION HOUSE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSINFONIA MEXICANA — $1,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER REDLA RIVERSIDE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAssistance League of San Bernardino — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN7.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Liaou Foundation Aka Sunny Hills Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Liaou Foundation Aka Sunny Hills Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Liaou Foundation Aka Sunny Hills Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph