Skip to content
LGT Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

LGT Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$671k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$3.4MHuman Services$2.3MEducation$459kPublic Safety & Disaster$300kEnvironment$185kSocial Science$23kReligion$500
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $89k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $577k
$30,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$8.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CERF$200,000
Haystack Mountain School of Crafts$184,000
Penland School of Crafts$140,000
Toledo Museum of Art$52,500
Madison Square Park Conservancy$30,000
Ox-Bow School of Art Artists Reside$20,250
Museum of Fine Arts -Houston$15,000
Surface Design Association$12,000
ArtTable Inc$12,000
Aspen Institute$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 33% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Fuller Craft Museum: $18k → 8%The Trustees of Reservations deCord: $10k → 16%Craft in America: $20k → 14%ArtTable Inc: $12k → 17%Int'l Studio and Curatorial Program: $17k → 20%Menil Foundation: $80k → 16%Surface Design Association: $12k → 12%Surface Design Association: $12k → 14%Crystal Bridges: $275k → 8%Ox-Bow School of Art Artists Reside: $20k → 10%John Michael Kohler Arts Center: $1.1M → 9%Rhode Island School of Design: $50k → 14%Toledo Museum of Art: $53k → 18%School of the Art Institute of Chicago: $25k → 14%CERF: $35k → 9%Maryland Institute College of Art: $50k → 19%Haystack Mountain School of Crafts: $184k → 11%Isami Noguchi Foundation Garden Mus: $50k → 13%ArtTable Inc: $12k → 17%Int'l Studio and Curatorial Program: $17k → 20%John Michael Kohler Arts Center: $60k → 9%United States Artists: $25k → 14%CERF: $35k → 9%The Fabric Workshop and Museum: $20k → 22%Socrates Sculpture Park: $15k → 13%ArtTable Inc: $12k → 17%Int'l Studio and Curatorial Program: $16k → 20%John Michael Kohler Arts Center: $50k → 9%CERF: $30k → 9%The Fabric Workshop and Museum: $15k → 22%Urban Glass: $16k → 20%Kohler Foundation Inc: $1.2M → 9%Kohler Foundation Inc: $1.1M → 9%Tate Americas Foundation: $496k → 17%The Metropolitan Museum of Art: $200k → 17%Greenwich House: $14k → 17%The Metropolitan Museum of Art: $200k → 17%Greenwich House: $12k → 17%Greenwich House: $12k → 17%Cooper Hewitt Design Museum: $25k → 17%Solomon RGuggenheim Museum Fdtn: $20k → 17%Bard Graduate Center: $115k → 17%Bard Graduate Center: $15k → 17%Madison Square Park Conservancy: $60k → 17%Madison Square Park Conservancy: $30k → 17%Madison Square Park Conservancy: $30k → 17%Madison Square Park Conservancy: $20k → 17%El Museo del Barrio: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
NM
AR
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of LGT Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 24% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 17%.

LGT Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 18 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
35

Total granted

$5.1M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+7%

Still filing today

89%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $213k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEmploymentEnvironmentPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KF
    KOHLER FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2021 · $2.2M · revenue +213%
  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    3× · 2019–2024 · $417k · revenue +76%
  • CRAFT EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $300k · revenue +127%

Funded once

  • TA
    TATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $496k · revenue -55%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $275k
  • MF
    Menil Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $80k · revenue +51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Art Explorium
—
2
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
3
Berggruen Institute
Education
4
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
5
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
6
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
7
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
8
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
9
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
10
Baltimore Museum of Art

The baltimore museum of art connects art to baltimore and baltimore to the world, embodying a commitment to artistic excellence and social equity in every decision from art presentation, interpretation, and collecting, to the composition…

Arts & Culture
11
The Florence Center for Contemporary Music
Arts & Culture
12
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Toledo Museum of Art; the most unlike its peers is River Valley Arts Collective Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
26/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KOHLER FOUNDATION INC: $2,228,100 · OtherKOHLER FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $275,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBard Graduate Center: $130,000 · Other+18 more: $320,250 · Other+18 moreJOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER INC: $1,170,000 · Arts & CultureJOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER INCTATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $495,500 · Arts & CultureTATE AMERICAS FOUNDATIONMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $417,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTPenland School Of Craft: $140,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $95,000 · Arts & Culture+20 more: $452,618 · Arts & Culture+20 moreHaystack Mountain School of Crafts: $194,000 · EducationMaryland Institute: $50,000 · EducationRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $50,000 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $25,000 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · EducationCRAFT EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND INC: $300,000 · PhilanthropyMADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $185,000 · EnvironmentARTTABLE INC: $66,000 · Public BenefitThe Fabric Workshop and Museum: $35,000 · EmploymentPETERS VALLEY SCHOOL OF CRAFT INC: $10,000 · Employment
Other$2,953,350Arts & Culture$2,770,118Education$329,000Philanthropy$300,000Environment$185,000Public Benefit$66,000Employment$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKOHLER FOUNDATION INC: $2,228,100 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetJOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER INC: $1,170,000 over 4y, 10.0% of budgetTATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $495,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $417,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCRAFT EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND INC: $300,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetHaystack Mountain School of Crafts: $194,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetMADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $185,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetPenland School Of Craft: $140,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $95,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMenil Foundation Inc: $80,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARTTABLE INC: $66,000 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART: $52,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL STUDIO & CURATORIAL PROGRAM INC: $50,018 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetMaryland Institute: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ISAMU NOGUCHI FOUNDATION AND GARDEN MUSEUM: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH HOUSE INC: $38,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Fabric Workshop and Museum: $35,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSURFACE DESIGN ASSOCIATION: $34,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Artists Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCRAFT IN AMERICA: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFULLER CRAFT MUSEUM INC: $18,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetURBANGLASS NEW YORK CONTEMPORARY GLASS CENTER INC: $16,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMIGOS DEL MUSEO DEL BARRIO INC EL MUSEO DEL BARRIO: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ALDRICH CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNational Basketry Organization Inc: $11,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetPETERS VALLEY SCHOOL OF CRAFT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetQUEENS MUSEUM OF ART: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VISUAL ARTS CENTER OF RICHMOND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWATERFALL ARTS: $9,600 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHunterdon Art Museum: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFiberarts Guild of Pittsburgh Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetRIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetAMERICAN TAPESTRY ALLIANCE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Windgate Charitable F…The Andy Warhol Found…Milton and Sally Aver…Studio in a School As…The Henry Luce Founda…The Hyde and Watson F…Hillman Family Founda…The Andrew W Mellon F…Alan M & Mildred S Ra…The Pierre & Tana Mat…Helen Frankenthaler F…Terra Foundation for …
Windgate Charitable Foundation IncAR24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Windgate Charitable Foundation Inc · The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · Milton and Sally Avery Arts Foundation · Studio in a School Association Inc · The Henry Luce Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Alan M & Mildred S Ravenal Foundation · The Pierre & Tana Matisse Foundation Inc · Helen Frankenthaler Foundation Inc · Terra Foundation for American Art

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization LGT Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from LGT Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • The Aldrich Contemporary Art Museum Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Hunterdon Art Museum: 9% of income from government
  • Fuller Craft Museum Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to LGT Foundation?

Find your warmest path to LGT Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on LGT’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home