Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lewis H Pool Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$112k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$448kReligion$136kInternational$114kHuman Services$52kHealth$36kPublic Safety & Disaster$17kFood & Nutrition$14kAnimals$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $61k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CISD Education Foundation$21,250
Living Hope for Honduras$15,000
Panola College Foundation$15,000
ALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY$10,000
Christian Works$5,000
Prestoncrest Church of Christ$5,000
Montgomery Blvd Church of Christ$5,000
Southern Methodist University$5,000
Christ's Family Clinic$5,000
Methodist Children's Home$3,000
Gold Network of East Texas$2,700
Presbyterian Ear Institute$2,500
East Texas Food Bank$2,000
University of Oklahoma Foundation$2,000
Mission Carthage$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Methodist Children's Home: $3k → 16%Methodist Children's Home: $3k → 16%Methodist Children's Home: $3k → 16%Methodist Children's Home: $2k → 16%Methodist Children's Home: $2k → 16%Methodist Children's Home: $2k → 16%Methodist Children's Home: $2k → 16%Methodist Children's Home: $1k → 16%Methodist Children's Home: $1k → 16%Christian Works for Children: $5k → 14%Christian Works for Children: $5k → 14%Christian Works for Children: $5k → 14%Christian Works for Children: $4k → 14%Christian Works for Children: $8k → 14%Christian Works for Children: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
CT
CO
MO
NM
TN
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$829k · 32 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
22

Total granted

$829k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
0%

Still filing today

41%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HERITAGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
    5× · 2017–2022 · $145k · revenue +121%
  • PC
    PANOLA COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $86k · revenue +27%
  • AA
    ALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • LH
    Living Hope co Broadstreet Church
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • JJ
    JUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -62%
  • NF
    NEW FRIENDS NEW LIFEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Texas Christian School Inc

To educate students with the transforming truth of christ, inspiring academic excellence, godly character, and integrity in life pursuits.

—
2
Temple Christian School

Our mission at temple christian school is to glorify god by providing for students a christ-centered education marked by excellence and grounded in biblical truth.

Education
3
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
4
Colleyville Covenant Christian

The mission is to provide a biblically based classical college preparatory education that inspires a passion for excellence a heart of grace and the character of Christ.

Education
5
Southwestern Christian College

Its purpose is to offer a holistic educational program that will motivate the student to value and achieve academi excellence within the context of commitment to moral and spiritual values.

Education
6
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

—
7
Pinnacle Christian School

Pinnacle Christian School serves to meet the education needs of families in the greater Parker County area by providing complete, advanced, Bible-based academic K-8th grade instruction taught by highly-qualified teachers on Tuesdays and…

Education
8
San Antonio Christian School

Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…

—
9
Mckinney Christian School

Mckinney christian academy exists to honor jesus christ by teaching students to live biblically through education of mind, body, and spirit.

Education
10
Carolina Christian Academy

Educational instruciton for students in prek-12th grades.

—
11
Community Christian School of Pampa Inc

Provide christ-centered education in a classroom setting

Education
12
Heritage Classical Academy

In partnership with parents, hca develops students who impact the kingdon and their culture b employing a christ-centered curriculum taught with excellence by gifted educators who embrace the classical model of education. hca emphasized…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trinity Christian Academy Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Panola County Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
15/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Living Hope for Honduras: $112,500 · OtherLiving Hope for HondurasCISD Education Foundation: $99,150 · OtherCISD Education FoundationPANOLA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $86,000 · OtherPANOLA COLLEGE FOUNDATIONPRESTONCREST CHURCH OF CHRIST: $51,500 · OtherPRESTONCREST CHURCH OF CHRISTMontgomery Blvd Church of Christ: $23,600 · OtherTrinity Christian Academy Foundatio: $18,000 · Other+39 more: $144,419 · Other+39 moreHERITAGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $144,500 · EducationHERITAGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMYALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY: $80,000 · EducationALBUQUERQUE ACADEMYSouthern Methodist University: $10,000 · Education+4 more: $8,500 · EducationChristian Works For Children Inc: $27,650 · Human ServicesMETHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $17,409 · Human ServicesCARTHAGE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $16,900 · Public Safety & DisasterGOLD NETWORK OF EAST TEXAS: $7,700 · HealthSHARED CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $7,500 · HealthMISSION CARTHAGE INC: $13,000 · Housing & ShelterIndependent Social Committee: $5,179 · Youth Development
Other$535,169Education$243,000Human Services$45,059Public Safety & Disaster$16,900Health$15,200Housing & Shelter$13,000Youth Development$5,179

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHERITAGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $144,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPANOLA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $86,000 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY: $80,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetChristian Works For Children Inc: $27,650 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetMETHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $17,409 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCARTHAGE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $16,900 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetMISSION CARTHAGE INC: $13,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN EAR INSTITUTE: $12,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOLD NETWORK OF EAST TEXAS: $7,700 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetSHARED CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetIndependent Social Committee: $5,179 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetJUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT STRING POWER: $2,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetCamp Deer Run Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAMMY BROWN LIBRARY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPANOLA COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHIS CHASE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSKY RANCHES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTISANS MARKETPLACE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HERITAGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds PANOLA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Christian Works For Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds CARTHAGE FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds MISSION CARTHAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN EAR INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds GOLD NETWORK OF EAST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds SHARED CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Independent Social Committee ↗
  • Who funds JUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT STRING POWER ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Camp Deer Run Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Charles C Matthews FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Charles C Matthews Foundation · The Crain Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Texas Instruments Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lewis H Pool Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lewis H Pool Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lewis H Pool Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lewis H Pool Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lewis H Pool’s filings →

    More from the funding graph