Skip to content

· Public charity

Lewis Family Charitable Foundation

The mission of the LEWIS FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION, as a supporting organization to the greater houston community foundation, is to provide financial support for charitable organizations in support of education, health, civic, and social services.

$110k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$148kYouth Development$120kEducation$115kHealth$83kPhilanthropy$69kHuman Services$56kArts & Culture$35kCrime & Legal$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $67,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $110,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $42,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
$12,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
THE WOMEN'S HOME$15,000
BAREFOOT REPUBLIC INC$12,500
DAYSTAR COUNSELING MINISTRIES INC$12,500
MUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%KNOX COUNTY HOMELESS COALITION: $10k → 11%Houston's Amazing Place Inc: $5k → 16%Houston's Amazing Place Inc: $5k → 16%Houston's Amazing Place Inc: $5k → 16%HOUSTON'S AMAZING PLACE INC: $5k → 16%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $20k → 16%The Women's Home: $20k → 16%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $20k → 16%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $15k → 16%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $15k → 16%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $15k → 16%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $15k → 16%The Women's Home: $10k → 16%The Women's Home: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$639k · 12 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$639k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+25%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WOMEN'S HOME
    9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +38%
  • BR
    BAREFOOT REPUBLIC INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $133k · revenue +74%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $55k · revenue +224%

Funded once

  • H
    Homeworthy
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ART
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +25%
  • UM
    UNITED MIDCOAST CHARITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—
2
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

—
3
Covenant HomeCare

Covenant HomeCare provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
4
Inseparable Inc

Inseparable Inc is focused on creating a world where mental health is treated as a critical and equal piece of overall health, and where systems are designed with their impact on mental health in mind. Inseparable, Inc. is a growing…

Health
5
Community of Hope

Community of hope's mission is to improve health, end homelessness, and partner with communities to make washington, dc more equitable.

Community Improvement
6
Bethany House Services Inc

Bethany House Services empowers homeless and at-risk families with the solutions to achieve housing stability and long-term self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
7
Meta House Inc

Meta house ends the generational cycle of addiction by healing women and strengthening families.

—
8
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
9
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
10
West Street Recovery

West Street Recovery's mission is to connect communities to the resources they need to rebuild after climate disasters such as Hurricane Harvey and build resilient, secure, and stronger communities.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Anchor House Inc

Anchor House provides trauma-informed residential treatment and recovery support services for men and women affected by substance use disorders. Through an integrated biopsychosocial and holistic approach, the organization restores hope,…

—
12
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Houston Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Thistle Farms Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE WOMEN'S HOME: $140,000 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S HOMESHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE: $22,500 · Human ServicesSHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHO…Houston's Amazing Place Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesHouston's Amazing Place IncHomeworthy: $10,000 · Human ServicesA 2ND CUP: $53,750 · OtherA 2ND CUPCHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC: $40,000 · OtherCHRIST PRESBYTERIAN …THISTLE FARMS INC: $27,500 · OtherTHISTLE FARMS INCDAYSTAR COUNSELING MINISTRIES INC: $12,500 · OtherDAYSTAR COUNSELING M…BAREFOOT REPUBLIC INC: $132,500 · Youth DevelopmentBAREFOOT REPUBLIC I…GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $84,200 · PhilanthropyGREATER HOUST…UNITED MIDCOAST CHARITIES INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED MIDCOA…FuelEd Schools Inc: $75,000 · EducationFuelEd Scho…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $55,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'…MUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INC: $15,000 · HealthMUSIC HEAL…Project Row Houses: $30,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ART: $5,000 · Arts & CultureProject Curate: $27,500 · Religion
Human Services$192,500Other$133,750Youth Development$132,500Philanthropy$89,200Education$75,000Health$70,000Arts & Culture$35,000Religion$27,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE WOMEN'S HOME: $140,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetBAREFOOT REPUBLIC INC: $132,500 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $84,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFuelEd Schools Inc: $75,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetA 2ND CUP: $53,750 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetProject Row Houses: $30,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHISTLE FARMS INC: $27,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetProject Curate: $27,500 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetSHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE: $22,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHouston's Amazing Place Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDAYSTAR COUNSELING MINISTRIES INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHomeworthy: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ART: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED MIDCOAST CHARITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds BAREFOOT REPUBLIC INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FuelEd Schools Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds A 2ND CUP ↗
  • Who funds Project Row Houses ↗
  • Who funds THISTLE FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Curate ↗
  • Who funds SHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Houston's Amazing Place Inc ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds DAYSTAR COUNSELING MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Homeworthy ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ART ↗
  • Who funds UNITED MIDCOAST CHARITIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX16.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Otter Island Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lewis Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lewis Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lewis Family Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lewis Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lewis Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph