Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Levitan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$177k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of Levitan Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Levitan Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $177k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

17
17
17
18
23
19
7
20
9
21
16
22
14
23
7
24
2
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$3.5MEducation$757kInternational$244kPublic Safety & Disaster$211kCivil Rights$177kArts & Culture$160kReligion$107kHealth$90kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROTHERS FOR LIFE HOPE FOR HEROISM$100,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$25,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$10,000
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF WASHINGTON$10,000
ISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SUN VALLEY ART MUSUEM$2,500
HENRY ART MUSEUM$2,500
WE HEART SEATTLE$2,500
ROWING CARES$1,500
WOOD RIVER JEWISH COMMUNITY$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,000
PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE$526
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AUTISM PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%BIG HOUSE FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $25k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 9%MIGHTY VET: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
IL
NY
CT
CA
NE
KY
NC
DC
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 42 repeat orgs$461k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

42 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
60

Total granted

$2.5M
$453k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+11%

Still filing today

55%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2019–2024 · $520k · revenue +44%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $150k · revenue +53%
  • TF
    THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF WASHINGTON
    5× · 2018–2024 · $132k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • OV
    ONE VISION FUTURES FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • DD
    DURHAM DEVILS GIVING INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    one grant, 2019 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

3
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
4
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
5
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
6
Board of Jewish Education Inc

The organization works to inspire and empower educators and institutions to create transformative jewish learning experiences for children, teens, and families. building on its historic role serving jewish day schools, congregations, and…

Religion
7
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
8
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

9
Avodah the Jewish Service Corps Inc

Avodah develops lifelong social justice leaders whose work is informed by jewish values and who inspire the jewish community to work toward a more just and equitable world.

Community Improvement
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

11
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
12
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Urban Hands. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyArts & Performance Organiza…Youth Education & Developme…Professional Associations &…Arts and Cultural Philanthr…Jewish Community Organizati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%68%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/70
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,495

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/63
Grantees still filing
44/63
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $2,516,423 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+3 more — $17,893 · PhilanthropyDUKE LEGACY FUND — $600,000 · OtherDUKE LEGACY FUNDBROTHERS FOR LIFE HOPE FOR HEROISM — $200,000 · OtherBROTHERS FOR LIFE HOPE FOR HEROISMUNITED WAY — $167,940 · OtherUNITED WAYDUKE TRINITY ANNUAL FUND — $69,395 · Other+77 more — $728,110 · Other+77 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY — $520,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSIT…THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF WASHINGTON — $132,000 · EducationTHE FRIENDSHIP…ISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC — $30,325 · Education+6 more — $41,300 · Education+6 moreFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $150,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $27,892 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $10,000 · International+2 more — $6,200 · InternationalSEATTLE ART MUSEUM — $42,323 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM — $35,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $16,000 · Arts & CultureBrothers for Life — $10,815 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $3,500 · Arts & CultureANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $100,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $4,850 · Civil RightsAREIVIM PHILANTHROPIC GROUP INC — $50,000 · ReligionTHE STEINHARDT FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH LIFE INC — $10,000 · ReligionOPENDOR MEDIA INC — $7,500 · ReligionONETABLE INC — $5,000 · Religion
Philanthropy$2,534,316Other$1,765,445Education$723,625International$194,092Arts & Culture$107,638Civil Rights$104,850Religion$72,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $2,516,423 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $520,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF WASHINGTON — $132,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAREIVIM PHILANTHROPIC GROUP INC — $50,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetSEATTLE ART MUSEUM — $42,323 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $38,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC — $30,325 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $27,892 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAINIER SCHOLARS — $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY PASSAGEWAYS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSUN VALLEY CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $17,138 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $16,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFARESTART — $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WUNDERGLO FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBrothers for Life — $10,815 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIGHTYVET — $10,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STEINHARDT FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH LIFE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCamp Solomon Schechter — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY — $7,893 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPENDOR MEDIA INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetONETABLE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA WESTERN SCHOOL OF LAW — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $4,850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEverstrong Prevention — $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF YOUTH — $3,175 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATHLETES FOR ISRAEL INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWe Heart Seattle — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Space Idaho Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetThe Nature Project — $2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTREEHOUSE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHolocaust Center For Humanity — $2,340 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC — $2,265 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HEIGHTS YOUTH INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATH — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF WASHINGTON
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds AREIVIM PHILANTHROPIC GROUP INC
  • Who funds SEATTLE ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM
  • Who funds ISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds RAINIER SCHOLARS
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PASSAGEWAYS
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds FARESTART
  • Who funds THE WUNDERGLO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
  • Who funds Brothers for Life
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA25.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle · Lott Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · United Way of King County · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Greenstein Family Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Fjc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The San Francisco Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Levitan Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 111 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph