Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Levin-Goffe Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$394k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$676kArts & Culture$419kCivil Rights$350kHuman Services$197kCrime & Legal$127kReligion$85kHealth$81kPhilanthropy$39kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMMIGRATION EQUALITY$100,000
MQ FOUNDATION$50,000
LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER$50,000
TREVOR DAY SCHOOL$40,000
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$20,000
BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC$20,000
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$20,000
OUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL$20,000
LAGUARDIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$15,000
WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$15,000
LGBTQ VICTORY INSTITUTE$15,000
RIVERKEEPER$15,000
AVODAH$10,000
SHOWER POWER$2,000
THE COOKE SCHOOL$1,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 17%LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS' COMMITTEE: $50k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS' COMMITTEE: $50k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC: $20k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC: $15k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 20 repeat orgs$269k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
12

Total granted

$1.8M
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+36%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IE
    IMMIGRATION EQUALITY
    5× · 2019–2024 · $240k · revenue +17%
  • TD
    Trevor Day School
    7× · 2018–2024 · $140k · revenue +26%
  • BR
    BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $135k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • LL
    LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION
    one grant, 2018 · $63k
  • PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +68%
  • GLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +164%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Gay Men's Health Crisis Inc

Over 9,000 clients are served by gmhc's programs each year. gmhc provides a broad array of programs through the efforts of clinicians, trained volunteers, and professional staff who identify undiagnosed cases on hiv, ensure access and…

Health
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
8
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
12
Long Island University

To provide excellence and access in private higher education to those who seek to expand their knowledge and prepare themselves for meaningful, educated lives and for service to their communities and the world.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Queens College Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Shower Power Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCriminal Justice Legal Serv…Affordable Housing Developm…Disability & Family Support…Member Social ClubsYouth Education & Developme…Women's Advocacy and Empowe…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%3%<5yr15%14%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr21%24%20–35yr14%31%35–55yr10%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%2%<5yr15%7%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr21%35%20–35yr14%26%35–55yr10%29%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
11%
6,603/57,506

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMON DENOMIATOR CO TOP HONORS INC — $400,000 · OtherCOMMON DENOMIATOR CO TOP HONORS INCLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION — $62,500 · OtherLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONTEMPLE AVODAH — $60,000 · OtherTEMPLE AVODAHPARK SQUARE ADVOCATES INC — $40,000 · OtherQUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $36,000 · OtherLAGUARDIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $34,500 · Other+15 more — $153,050 · Other+15 moreTOP HONORS INCORPORATED — $360,000 · EducationTOP HONORS INCORPORATEDTrevor Day School — $140,000 · EducationTrevor Day SchoolWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $90,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY+1 more — $12,357 · EducationIMMIGRATION EQUALITY — $240,000 · Civil RightsIMMIGRATION EQUAL…PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT — $30,000 · Civil RightsPROTECT DEMOCRACY…LGBTQ Victory Institute Inc — $30,000 · Civil RightsLGBTQ Victory Ins…GLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INC — $15,000 · Civil RightsBOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC — $135,000 · Human ServicesBOWERY RES…Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc — $60,000 · Human ServicesLesbian an…+2 more — $7,000 · Human ServicesMQ FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · HealthGMHC HEALTH SERVICES INC — $20,000 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FOR GENDER-SPECIFIC MEDICINE INC — $5,000 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthAVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC — $60,000 · Community ImprovementFIORELLO H LAGUARDIA FOUNDATION INC — $36,500 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$786,050Education$602,357Civil Rights$315,000Human Services$202,000Health$75,500Community Improvement$60,000Philanthropy$41,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTOP HONORS INCORPORATED — $360,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetIMMIGRATION EQUALITY — $240,000 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetTrevor Day School — $140,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC — $135,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc — $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMQ FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetFIORELLO H LAGUARDIA FOUNDATION INC — $36,500 over 3y, 24% of budgetQUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $36,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLGBTQ Victory Institute Inc — $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERKEEPER INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYORK COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $12,357 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC — $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR GENDER-SPECIFIC MEDICINE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOWER POWER INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMASTERVOICES INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SPIRITUALITY AND THE ARTS INC — $1,250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Community TrustNY14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Levin-Goffe Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Wesleyan University1% of income from government
  • Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Levin-Goffe Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Levin-Goffe Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph