Skip to content
Levin Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Levin Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.0M
Granted FY2026still arriving
5
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$642k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Philanthropy$1.9MArts & Culture$188kRecreation & Sports$135kReligion$92kInternational$89kHealth$55kCrime & Legal$50kFood & Nutrition$27kOther$0
02FY2026 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.9M
$638,730
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING ROBERTA A LEVIN DONOR - SCHWAB 7441-2661$641,892
DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING SUSAN B LEVIN DONOR - SCHWAB 3615-1583$641,304
DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING ALAN LEVIN DONOR - SCHWAB 9762-4496$638,730
IGNITE ADAPTIVE SPORTS$34,000
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$11,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%IGNITE ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $34k → 12%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $5k → 14%IGNITE ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $16k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOC: $3k → 12%BOULDER JCC: $33k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
CT
CA
CO
NE
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$556k · 10 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2026, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
26

Total granted

$556k
$205k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+4%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM
    3× · 2017–2019 · $50k · revenue +37%
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    3× · 2021–2025 · $33k · revenue +24%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    2× · 2020–2022 · $20k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $33k · revenue +111%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD
    one grant, 2025 · $16k
  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    one grant, 2025 · $16k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
4
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
8
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
9
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
10
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
11
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
12
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ignite Adaptive Sports. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING ROBERTA A LEVIN DONOR - SCHWAB 7441-2661: $641,892 · OtherDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING ROBERTA A LEVIN DONOR - SCHWAB 7441-2661DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING SUSAN B LEVIN DONOR - SCHWAB 3615-1583: $641,304 · OtherDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING SUSAN B LEVIN DONOR - SCHWAB 3615-1583DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING ALAN LEVIN DONOR - SCHWAB 9762-4496: $638,730 · OtherDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING ALAN LEVIN DONOR - SCHWAB 9762-4496Individual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherHARRAMBEE ARTS STUDIO: $98,000 · OtherIGNITE ADAPTIVE SPORTS HEROS FUND: $85,000 · OtherHARAMBEE ARTS STUDIO: $85,000 · Other+17 more: $116,800 · OtherDIRECT RELIEF: $32,500 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $20,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $16,000 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $10,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 · InternationalIGNITE ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $32,618 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM: $50,000 · Crime & LegalJEWISHColorado: $25,180 · PhilanthropyPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $15,000 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $5,000 · HealthLA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO INC: $2,500 · HealthNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,406,726International$108,500Human Services$90,618Crime & Legal$50,000Philanthropy$25,180Health$22,500Arts & Culture$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIGNITE ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $50,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM: $50,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetTHE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $32,618 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $32,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISHColorado: $25,180 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Levin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Levin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Levin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home