Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leonard P Steuart Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$607k
Granted FY2022
18
Grants FY2022
10
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$482kReligion$121kHealth$87kAnimals$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kEducation$6kHuman Services$6kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2022 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k9 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $549k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
J CHRISTOPHER MARTENS DONOR ADVISED FUND$120,299
HARRY MARTENS III DONOR ADVISED FUND$120,110
L STEUART MARTENS DONOR ADVISED FUND$120,110
DANA E MARTENS DONOR ADVISED FUND$120,110
WESLEY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$68,697
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$15,000
CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE$15,000
SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA$10,110
MAKE A WISH MID-ATLANTIC INC$10,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$5,000
PAWS FOR PEOPLE$1,100
PAWS 4 PEOPLE FOUNDATION$500
FREDERICK HEALTH$500
WESTERN MARYLAND SCENIC RAILROAD$300
SMILE TRAIN$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $15k → 7%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $1k → 17%PAWS 4 PEOPLE FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 7%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $500 → 17%PAWS 4 PEOPLE FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%PAWS FOR PEOPLE: $1k → 10%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 7%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $500 → 17%PAWS 4 PEOPLE FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%PAWS FOR PEOPLE: $850 → 10%PAWS 4 PEOPLE FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%PAWS FOR PEOPLE: $500 → 10%PAWS 4 PEOPLE FOUNDATION: $500 → 12%PAWS 4 PEOPLE FOUNDATION: $500 → 12%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE: $100 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
IA
PA
RI
CA
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$254k · 28 repeat orgs$504k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2022, 19 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
25

Total granted

$254k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+13%

Still filing today

64%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $492k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $20k · revenue +76%
  • PI
    PAWS4PEOPLE INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $7k · revenue +58%
  • BC
    BETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE RESCUE SQUAD INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • AA
    ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION - FLORIDA
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
2
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
3
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
4
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
5
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
6
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
7
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
8
Shock Trauma Associates Pa

Under the medical sevice plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical instruction…

Health
9
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
11
University of Maryland Facultyphysicians Inc

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…

Health
12
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is KindWorks Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
28/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

J CHRISTOPHER MARTENS DONOR ADVISED FUND: $120,299 · OtherJ CHRISTOPHER MARTENS DONOR ADVISED FUNDDANA E MARTENS DONOR ADVISED FUND: $120,110 · OtherDANA E MARTENS DONOR ADVISED FUNDHARRY MARTENS III DONOR ADVISED FUND: $120,110 · OtherHARRY MARTENS III DONOR ADVISED FUNDL STEUART MARTENS DONOR ADVISED FUND: $120,110 · OtherL STEUART MARTENS DONOR ADVISED FUNDWESLEY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE METHODIST CHURCH: $93,697 · OtherWESLEY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE METHODIST CHURCHALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $34,900 · OtherMETROPOLITAN METHODIST CHURCH: $26,000 · Other+33 more: $67,250 · Other+33 moreCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesPAWS4PEOPLE INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesPET-ASSISTED VISITATION VOLUNTEER SERVICES INC: $2,450 · Human ServicesPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $2,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $10,110 · AnimalsMONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $700 · Animals+1 more: $200 · AnimalsBETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE RESCUE SQUAD INC: $3,100 · HealthSUBURBAN HOSPITAL INC: $1,100 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $600 · HealthFrederick Health Inc: $500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $200 · HealthNORWOOD SCHOOL INC: $2,500 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY: $750 · EducationLANDON SCHOOL: $600 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentC&O CANAL TRUST INC: $1,150 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE BAY MARITIME MUSEUM INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$702,476Human Services$31,050Animals$11,010Health$5,500Education$4,950Environment$3,150Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC INC: $13,200 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $10,110 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS4PEOPLE INC: $6,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE RESCUE SQUAD INC: $3,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORWOOD SCHOOL INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPET-ASSISTED VISITATION VOLUNTEER SERVICES INC: $2,450 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetC&O CANAL TRUST INC: $1,150 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSUBURBAN HOSPITAL INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY MARITIME MUSEUM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLANDON SCHOOL: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT AND SMALL: $550 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFrederick Health Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKindWorks Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHADOW CATS RESCUE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOME INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS4PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds NORWOOD SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds PET-ASSISTED VISITATION VOLUNTEER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds C&O CANAL TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds SUBURBAN HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY MARITIME MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds LANDON SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Carl M Freeman Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Global Impact · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leonard P Steuart Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leonard P Steuart Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Mount Saint Mary's University Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Suburban Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leonard P Steuart Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Leonard P Steuart Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leonard P Steuart’s filings →

More from the funding graph