Skip to content

Florida · Private foundation

Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$694k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
17
Grants FY2025
6
Organizations funded FY2024
33%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$350,000
Organizations funded a year
5 to 7
FY2019 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 33% of the organizations Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 34% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24
Youth DevelopmentPublic BenefitCrime & LegalHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving17$694k71%
FY20246$44k33%
FY20235$35k20%
FY20215$30k60%
FY20207$35k57%
FY20196$30kn/a
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$360kHousing & Shelter$133kHuman Services$110kPublic Benefit$75kHealth$49kYouth Development$45kCrime & Legal$25kEducation$25kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 17 grantees
All grantees of Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Forward Paths Foundation Inc$128,00056%
Villagers for Veterans Inc$60,00026%
Lake Sumter Children's Advocacy Center Inc$34,00031%
Educational Foundation of Lake County Inc$20,00011%
Powerhouse Youth Project$15,000111%
Leesburg Food Bank Inc$15,00016%
Turning Point USA Inc$10,00020%
Christian Care Center Inc$10,00020%
Samaritan's Purse$10,00020%
Grace Medical Home Inc$10,00020%
House of Hope Orlando Inc$10,00021%
Marine Toys for Tots Foundation$10,00020%
Judicial Watch Inc$5,00010%
Liberty Counsel Inc$5,0001n/a
The Path of Citrus County Inc$5,00011%
Leesburg Heritage Society Inc$5,0001n/a
Leesburg Humane Society$5,00011%

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($511k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetForward Paths Foundation Inc: $128,000 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetVillagers for Veterans Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetLake Sumter Children's Advocacy Center Inc: $34,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetEducational Foundation of Lake County Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPowerhouse Youth Project: $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetLeesburg Food Bank Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetTurning Point USA Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Care Center Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSamaritan's Purse: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGrace Medical Home Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHouse of Hope Orlando Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMarine Toys for Tots Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJudicial Watch Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Path of Citrus County Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLeesburg Humane Society: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Monar Fred B Helen Char Co-TaFL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Monar Fred B Helen Char Co-Ta · Mount Dora Community Trust · Rogers Family Foundation Inc · Mattick Family Foundation Inc · Parady Cares Foundation Inc · Harper Family Charitable Foundation Inc · The Fraternal Order of Eagles Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust?

Find your warmest path to Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust

How much does Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust give?
Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust reported 17 grants totaling $693,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 7 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.
What does Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (41%), Housing & Shelter (15%), Human Services (13%).
Who are Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: Forward Paths Foundation Inc ($128k), Villagers for Veterans Inc ($60k), Lake Sumter Children's Advocacy Center Inc ($34k).
Does Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Monar Fred B Helen Char Co-Ta, Mount Dora Community Trust, Rogers Family Foundation Inc.
Where is Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust based?
Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust is based in FL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble’s filings →

More from the funding graph