· Private foundation
Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of LEONARD J AND NANCY E REINHOLZ CHARITBLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $170k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
- $250k+1 grant · $350k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Gladys Cickson Charitable trust | $350,000 |
| Forward Paths Foundation | $100,000 |
| Villagers for Veterans | $50,000 |
| UF Health Leesburg Health Foundatio | $25,000 |
| Project SOS Support for soldiers | $20,000 |
| House of Hope | $20,000 |
| Lake Sumter Childrens Advocacy Cen | $20,000 |
| DAV Chapter 150 | $20,000 |
| Education Foundation of Lake County | $20,000 |
| Leesburg Food Bank | $15,000 |
| LoveExtension | $15,000 |
| Powerhouse Youth Project | $15,000 |
| Toys for Tots | $8,000 |
| Mike Endowment Org324 S 17th Street | $5,000 |
| Leesburg Heritage Society | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $496k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FPFORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC5× · 2021–2025 · $128k · revenue +75%
- LSLAKE SUMTER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC3× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +45%
- TPTURNING POINT USA INC2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +41%
Funded once
JUDICIAL WATCH INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +40%- LCLIBERTY COUNSEL INCone grant, 2024 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Lighthouse ministries, inc. is set apart by the spirit of god to communicate the gospel of jesus christ to meet the physical, emotional, and other needs of the poor and at-risk population.
The remnant house, located in lee county, mississippi provides men and women with a faith-based christian transitional living home and recovery program. our christ-centered one year transitional living recovery program allows an individual…
Lamp of Hope Ministries is a non profit organization committed to improving the well-being of families and individuals facing poverty homelessness domestic abuse low literacy military family service major illness and the aftermath of…
To provide homes for disadvantaged children.
City rescue mission, inc. (the organization), a not-for-profit organization founded in 1946, exists to transform the lives of the homeless and needy, serving them through the love and compassion of jesus christ. the organization provides a…
Pathways to care is dedicated to providing health, housing and hope to central floridas homeless.
To bring the hungry, hurting, and homeless to a new life, new goals, and a new future in christ.
The lord's place, inc. (the lord's place or agency) is a non-sectarian organization dedicated to breaking the cycle of homelessness for men, women and children in our community. supportive services offered through our housing programs…
His house children's home is a faith-based organization that restores the lives of children and families.
Provided spiritual & psychological guidence to alcoholic men. no discrimination as to race or creed.
The mission of the samaritan health and wellness center, inc. is to reclaim the healing ministry of jesus christ by providing affordable, professional primary health care and counseling for the working uninsured and under insured in lee…
Providing hope for the homeless and hurting through housing, case management, support services and strategic alliances.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is House of Hope Orlando Inc and the most unlike its peers is Leesburg Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VILLAGERS FOR VETERANS INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE SUMTER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION OF LAKE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds LEESBURG FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds POWERHOUSE YOUTH PROJECT ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds Grace Medical Home Inc ↗
- Who funds Christian Care Center Inc ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE ORLANDO INC ↗
- Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds THE PATH OF CITRUS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds LEESBURG HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Monar Fred B Helen Char Co-Ta · Mount Dora Community Trust · Rogers Family Foundation Inc · Mattick Family Foundation Inc · Parady Cares Foundation Inc · Harper Family Charitable Foundation Inc · The Fraternal Order of Eagles Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust?
Find your warmest path to Leonard J and Nancy E Reinholz Charitble Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.