Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leonard Hill Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$825k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$17MRecreation & Sports$6.5MReligion$2.0MInternational$1.5MArts & Culture$1.2MHousing & Shelter$890kHealth$880kPublic Benefit$800kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $764k
  • $250k+9 grants · $4.8M
$100,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEGE TRACK LOS ANGELES$825,000
PARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS$755,000
PARTNERS IN SCHOOL INNOVATION$560,000
CITY YEAR INC$500,000
PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED$500,000
READING PARTNERS$500,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$500,000
YMCA$378,000
J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC$250,000
SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE$200,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$180,000
AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION$100,000
INSTITUTE FOR NOPROFIT NEWS$100,000
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ARTS$80,000
IKAR$54,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $598k → 22%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $300k → 22%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $264k → 22%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $200k → 22%PARA LOS NINOS: $30k → 14%THE FULFILLMENT FUND: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
RI
CA
AZ
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of Leonard Hill Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 63% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 71%.

Leonard Hill Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$29M · 39 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
27

Total granted

$29M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-1%

Still filing today

72%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $4.5M · revenue +94%
  • CITY YEAR INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +0%
  • BS
    BIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION
    2× · 2018–2020 · $1.5M · revenue +318% · 82% of their budget

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2023 · $410k · revenue -51%
  • NC
    NATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $295k · revenue -61%
  • JS
    J STREET EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
2
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
3
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
4
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
5
The California Education Partners

California education partners seeds and grows collaborations among california's school systems, so that they innovate, improve, and build internal capacity as learning organizations in order to close gaps and lead high performing,…

Education
6
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
7
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
8
Alternative Schools Inc

To help each child reach his/her full potential by cultivating an active village of parents, community members, and stakeholders involved in providing an individual, personal, and conceptual learning environment for each student.

Education
9
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
10
Aim High for High School

To increase educational equity by providing joyful, enriching learning experiences for middle school students, aspiring teachers, and experienced educators.

Education
11
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
12
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partners in School Innovation; the most unlike its peers is Keshet Chaim Dance Ensemble. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/53
Grantees still filing
35/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLLEGE TRACK LOS ANGELES: $3,000,000 · OtherCOLLEGE TRACK LOS ANGELESCITY YEAR INC: $2,300,000 · OtherCITY YEAR INCGREAT PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $2,050,000 · OtherGREAT PUBLIC SCHOOLSCOLLEGE ADVING CORPS: $1,680,000 · OtherCOLLEGE ADVING CORPSYMCA: $500,000 · OtherSPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $1,362,000 · OtherSPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVETHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $700,000 · Other+36 more: $3,353,500 · Other+36 morePARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS: $4,527,500 · EducationPARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELE…READING PARTNERS: $1,000,000 · EducationREADING PARTNERSTHE BIG PICTURE COMPANY: $920,000 · EducationTHE BIG PICTURE COMPANYNATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC: $295,000 · Education+9 more: $887,032 · Education+9 morePLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $2,030,000 · Youth DevelopmentPLAYWORKS…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC: $600,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITI…+3 more: $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEW ISRAEL FUND: $930,000 · InternationalCureCervicalCancer: $800,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $410,000 · InternationalINSTITUTE FOR FIELD RESEARCH: $110,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $100,000 · International+2 more: $30,000 · InternationalBIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $1,500,000 · EnvironmentTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES: $875,000 · PhilanthropyPARTNERS IN SCHOOL INNOVATION: $575,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $20,000 · PhilanthropyJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $1,450,000 · Religion
Other$14,945,500Education$7,629,532Youth Development$2,720,000International$2,380,000Environment$1,500,000Philanthropy$1,470,000Religion$1,450,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS: $4,527,500 over 6y, 8.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $2,300,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $2,030,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetBIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $1,500,000 over 2y, 82% of budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $1,450,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetSPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $1,362,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $1,000,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $930,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE BIG PICTURE COMPANY: $920,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES: $875,000 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetCureCervicalCancer: $800,000 over 8y, 27% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $700,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC: $600,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetPARTNERS IN SCHOOL INNOVATION: $575,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $410,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME: $300,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND: $300,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC: $295,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNational Education Opportunity Network Inc: $242,032 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetPS ARTS: $200,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS: $130,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPitzer College: $120,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR FIELD RESEARCH: $110,000 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADY TO SUCCEED: $100,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetVIP COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetONE FAIR WAGE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES CONSERVANCY: $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetKINO BORDER INITIATIVE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Thacher School Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKESHET CHAIM DANCE ENSEMBLE: $25,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetBrothers for Life: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPRING OF EVOLUTION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetWEINGART CENTER ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMINORITY HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetAMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLos Angeles County Bicycle Coalition: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURTIS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INDUSTRY PRODUCTIONS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED ↗
  • Who funds BIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE BIG PICTURE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds THE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds CureCervicalCancer ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN SCHOOL INNOVATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
  • Who funds COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds National Education Opportunity Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds PS ARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE MATCH ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS ↗
  • Who funds Pitzer College ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR FIELD RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds READY TO SUCCEED ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA32.5× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Liberty Hill Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Great Public Schools Now · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Gates Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leonard Hill Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leonard Hill Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leonard Hill Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Leonard Hill Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leonard Hill’s filings →

More from the funding graph