Skip to content
Leon and Zipporah Goldstein Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Leon and Zipporah Goldstein Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$622k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$622k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$2.1MInternational$293kReligion$255kHealth$153kHuman Services$63kEducation$34kRecreation & Sports$10kEmployment$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$622,257
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST$622,257
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $6k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 6%MOSDOS NESIVAS SHALOM INC: $200 → 14%MOSDOS NESIVAS SHALOM INC: $200 → 14%MOSDOS NESIVAS SHALOM INC: $200 → 14%TEMECH INC: $10k → 17%MOSDOS NESIVAS SHALOM INC: $200 → 14%MOSDOS NESIVAS SHALOM INC: $200 → 14%SPARKS OF LIFE INC: $36 → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $1k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $900 → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $700 → 11%OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
NJ
CA
AZ
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 49 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +92% since the first grant, against +56% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 48 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
63

Total granted

$2.8M
$129k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%
+56%

Still filing today

55%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SHAVEI HEVRON INSTITUTIONS INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $102k · revenue +109%
  • VH
    VAAD HARABBANIM L'INYANEI TZEDUKA INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $77k · revenue +80%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER
    4× · 2017–2021 · $70k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • CY
    CHEVRA-KADISHA YERUSHALAYIM INC
    one grant, 2019 · $19k · revenue -54%
  • NJ
    NATIONAL JEWISH POLICY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +56%
  • TI
    TEMECH INC CO AVI SCHRON
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
6
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
8
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
9
American Friends of Ohev Yisrael

Support for study of torah and chasiddus in ramat shilo, israel

Religion
10
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
11
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
12
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shavei Hevron Institutions Inc; the most unlike its peers is Aishel Hatzedek. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 114 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/52
Grantees still filing
44/52
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $2,054,247 · OtherDETAILS OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST+74 more: $266,486 · Other+74 moreSHAVEI HEVRON INSTITUTIONS INC: $102,200 · InternationalSHAVEI HEVR…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER: $70,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FR…FRIENDS OF NAHAL HAREDI: $47,100 · InternationalFRIENDS OF …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ATERET COHANIM INC: $30,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FR…AISHEL HATZEDEK: $14,400 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $14,000 · International+9 more: $26,454 · International+9 moreVAAD HARABBANIM L'INYANEI TZEDUKA INC: $76,800 · ReligionMOSDOS KEVER RACHEL IMEINU: $25,000 · Religion+2 more: $1,440 · ReligionPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $41,300 · PhilanthropyCHEVRA-KADISHA YERUSHALAYIM INC: $18,800 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MESHI INC: $16,600 · PhilanthropyAmerican friends of Machon Daniel Inc: $6,000 · PhilanthropyBikur Vezrat Cholim Inc: $3,600 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF MAYANOT INSTITUTE INC: $3,500 · Philanthropy+2 more: $3,550 · PhilanthropySHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $67,000 · Food & NutritionFRIENDS OF JERUSALEM COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY LTD: $25,000 · EducationNO SHAME ON U INC: $6,500 · EducationBEER YESHAYA CHEDER BEER YESHAYA: $4,010 · EducationMORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD: $1,800 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationTEMECH INC CO AVI SCHRON: $10,000 · Human ServicesDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $2,800 · Human ServicesOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $1,800 · Human ServicesMOSDOS NESIVAS SHALOM INC: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $36 · Human Services
Other$2,320,733International$304,154Religion$103,240Philanthropy$93,350Food & Nutrition$67,000Education$38,310Human Services$23,136

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHAVEI HEVRON INSTITUTIONS INC: $102,200 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetVAAD HARABBANIM L'INYANEI TZEDUKA INC: $76,800 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER: $70,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $67,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF NAHAL HAREDI: $47,100 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $41,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ATERET COHANIM INC: $30,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF JERUSALEM COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY LTD: $25,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetMOSDOS KEVER RACHEL IMEINU: $25,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YIKAR MORDECHAI: $18,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MESHI INC: $16,600 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAISHEL HATZEDEK: $14,400 over 4y, 35% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH POLICY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTEMECH INC CO AVI SCHRON: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBINA STROKE AND BRAIN INJURY ASSISTANCE INC: $8,600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNO SHAME ON U INC: $6,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL SPORT CENTER FOR THE DISABLED: $6,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMACHON AHAVAT EMET: $5,220 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAT MELECH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetENDOWMENT FOR MIDDLE EAST TRUTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBEER YESHAYA CHEDER BEER YESHAYA: $4,010 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF MAYANOT INSTITUTE INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $2,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOSDOS NESIVAS SHALOM INC: $1,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Yeshivat Lev Hatorah: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTorah Images Inc: $900 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMIFAL CHESED FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLEV BEREL INC: $540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Gimmel Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEAN CASEY ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA TIFERES CHAIM INC: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Ojc FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…Associated Jewish Cha…Zichron Yechiel Meche…Zichron Chaim Charity…The Slomo and Cindy S…The Dennis Berman Fam…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Zichron Chaya Roc…Aj & Sl Stern Family …Fjc
Jewish Communal FundNY40.8× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · The Slomo and Cindy Silvian Foundation Inc · The Dennis Berman Family Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Zichron Chaya Rochel Foundation · Aj & Sl Stern Family Foundation · Fjc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leon and Zipporah Goldstein Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leon and Zipporah Goldstein Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    10get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Leon and Zipporah Goldstein Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Leon and Zipporah Goldstein Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 114 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leon and Zipporah Goldstein’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home