Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leo R Buder Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$74k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$1.7MHealth$1.2MEducation$799kYouth Development$799kPhilanthropy$532kEnvironment$281kAnimals$266kPublic Safety & Disaster$266kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k34 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $139k
$24,794
Median grant
7
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALVATION ARMY$74,375
MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN$64,588
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS$49,583
BARNARD FREE SKIN AND CANCER HOSPITAL$49,583
GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI$49,583
UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS$49,583
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$49,583
EVANGELICAL CHILDREN'S HOME$49,583
YOUTHBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$49,583
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR KANSAS CITY$49,583
GREATER ST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL- BSA$49,583
SUSAN R BUDER SCHOOL ASSOCIATION$49,583
SHRINERS' HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$49,583
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$24,794
THOMAS DUNN MEMORIALS LEARNING CENTER$24,794
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $51k → 14%EVANGELICAL CHILDREN'S HOME: $51k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $51k → 15%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $50k → 14%EVANGELICAL CHILDREN'S HOME: $50k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR KANSAS CITY: $50k → 15%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $49k → 14%EVANGELICAL CHILDREN'S HOME: $49k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $49k → 15%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $43k → 14%EVANGELICAL CHILDREN'S HOME: $44k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $43k → 15%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $40k → 14%EVANGELICAL CHILDREN'S HOME: $43k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $40k → 15%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $34k → 14%EVANGELICAL CHILDREN'S HOME: $34k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $34k → 15%YOUTH BRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $51k → 11%YOUTHBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%YOUTH BRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $49k → 11%YOUTH BRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $43k → 11%YOUTH BRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%YOUTH BRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $34k → 11%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP: $25k → 11%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP: $26k → 11%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP: $24k → 11%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP: $22k → 11%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP: $20k → 11%SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD: $26k → 21%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP: $17k → 11%SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $25k → 21%SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD: $24k → 21%SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD: $22k → 21%SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD: $20k → 21%SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD: $17k → 21%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOC: $26k → 21%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS: $26k → 21%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS: $25k → 21%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS: $24k → 21%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOC: $24k → 21%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOC: $22k → 21%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS: $22k → 21%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOC: $20k → 21%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS: $20k → 21%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOC: $17k → 21%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS: $17k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MO
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.2M · 36 repeat orgs$248k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
8

Total granted

$6.2M
$248k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
0%

Still filing today

64%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $248k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MB
    MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $281k · revenue +14%
  • EC
    Evangelical Children's Home
    6× · 2020–2025 · $271k · revenue +20%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $266k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • BF
    Barnard Free Skin And Cancer Hospital
    one grant, 2025 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 312 - GREATER ST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL
    one grant, 2025 · $50k · revenue -25%
  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES
    one grant, 2025 · $25k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
2
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
3
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
4
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
5
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
6
Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center Inc

Luminis health's mission is to enhance the health of the people and communities we serve. our vision is living healthier together. we believe that health and wellness are fundamental to everyone. we work side-by-side with our community and…

Health
7
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
8
St Luke's Des Peres Episcopal- Presbyterian Hospital

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
Bionexus Kc

We inspire thinkers from different disciplines to combine their efforts for a common purpose: healthcare innovation.(continued on schedule o)from bioinformatics to cancer research and beyond, we stimulate collaboration and help bring…

Science & Tech
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
A T Still University of Health Sciences

A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Thomas Dunn Memorials. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
19/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $399,331 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC: $266,214 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INCSUSAN R BUDER SCHOOL ASSOC: $266,214 · OtherSUSAN R BUDER SCHOOL ASSOCIndividual grant recipient: $216,631 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL- BOY: $216,631 · OtherST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL- BOYCOLLEGE SCHOOL OF THE OZARKS: $133,117 · OtherANNIE MALONE CHILDRENS HOME: $133,117 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS TOWN OF MISSOURI: $133,117 · OtherCONVENT OF GOOD SHEPHERD: $133,117 · OtherTHE LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $133,117 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $108,323 · OtherFATHER DEMPSEYS HOTELS INC: $108,323 · OtherSAINT LOUIS ZOO ENDOWMENT: $108,323 · OtherARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $108,323 · OtherThomas Dunn Memorials: $108,323 · Other+8 more: $306,670 · Other+8 moreEvangelical Children's Home: $270,937 · Human ServicesEvangelical Children's Hom…YOUTHBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $266,214 · Human ServicesYOUTHBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUN…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $266,214 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cros…Little Sisters of The Poor: $266,214 · Human ServicesLittle Sisters of The PoorCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS: $133,117 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE …SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $133,117 · Human ServicesSOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD …BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC: $133,117 · Human ServicesBETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INCYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ST JOSEPH: $108,323 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASS…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $266,214 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPI…AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $133,117 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG …American Diabetes Association: $133,117 · HealthAmerican Diabe…American Heart Association Inc: $133,117 · HealthAmerican Heart…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $133,117 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES…Barnard Free Skin And Cancer Hospital: $49,583 · HealthBarnard Free S…+1 more: $24,794 · HealthWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $266,214 · EducationCENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $133,117 · EducationMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $281,219 · EnvironmentKINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL: $133,117 · Youth DevelopmentGENE SLAY'S BOYS' CLUB OF ST LOUIS INC: $133,117 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $266,214 · PhilanthropyHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $133,117 · Animals
Other$2,878,891Human Services$1,577,253Health$873,059Education$399,331Environment$281,219Youth Development$266,234Philanthropy$266,214Animals$133,117

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $281,219 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEvangelical Children's Home: $270,937 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTHBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $266,214 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $266,214 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC: $266,214 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $266,214 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $266,214 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $266,214 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLittle Sisters of The Poor: $266,214 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $133,117 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $133,117 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $133,117 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL: $133,117 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetGENE SLAY'S BOYS' CLUB OF ST LOUIS INC: $133,117 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS: $133,117 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $133,117 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $133,117 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $133,117 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC: $133,117 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $133,117 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $133,117 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ST JOSEPH: $108,323 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetThomas Dunn Memorials: $108,323 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE PARTNERSHIP: $88,884 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetBarnard Free Skin And Cancer Hospital: $49,583 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $24,794 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds Evangelical Children's Home ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds Little Sisters of The Poor ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds KINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL ↗
  • Who funds GENE SLAY'S BOYS' CLUB OF ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ST JOSEPH ↗
  • Who funds Thomas Dunn Memorials ↗
  • Who funds LIFEBRIDGE PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Barnard Free Skin And Cancer Hospital ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 312 - GREATER ST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Co Tr Ua Viola J ReynoldsTX41.2× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Co Tr Ua Viola J Reynolds · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Youthbridge Community Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Norman J Stupp Foundation · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · Edward Jones Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leo R Buder Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leo R Buder Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leo R Buder Foundation Trust?

Find your warmest path to Leo R Buder Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leo R Buder’s filings →

More from the funding graph