Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Leo Nevas Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2022
14
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

International$1.2MReligion$1.1MCivil Rights$835kSocial Science$625kYouth Development$280kPhilanthropy$132kArts & Culture$50kOther$0
02FY2022 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $1k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $785k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JACOB BLAUSTEIN INSTITUTE AJC$250,000
RELIGIOUS ACTION CENTER OF REFORM JUDAISM$200,000
UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM$175,000
MEET INTERNATIONAL INC$100,000
FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC$100,000
ISRAEL REFORM ACTION CENTER (IRAC)$60,000
AVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT - DODD CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS$50,000
T'RUAH (THE RABBINIC CALL FOR HUMAN RIGHTS)$50,000
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC$25,000
CONGREGATION BETH EL$20,000
CORNELL LAW SCHOOL$15,000
SUNFLOWER OF PEACE$1,000
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC (JDC)$180
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNFLOWER OF PEACE: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
MN
NY
MA
IA
CT
CA
MD
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of Leo Nevas Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Leo Nevas Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 12 repeat orgs$366k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +95% since the first grant, against +51% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$2.9M
$305k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+51%

Still filing today

50%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
InternationalReligionCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $280k · revenue +95%
  • MI
    MEET INTERNATIONAL INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $240k · revenue +41%
  • AT
    AVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $220k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • FI
    FAITH IN ACTION (FKA PICO NATIONAL NETWORK)
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ISRAEL INITIATIVE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -67% · 54% of their budget
  • HI
    HIAS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
2
International Fellowship of Christians & Jews Inc

The international fellowship of christian and jews is the leading non-profit building bridges between christians and jews, blessing israel and the jewish people around the world with, humanitarian care and life-saving aid.

3
Better Future for Israel

To strengthen israel's future in these areas: 1)providing new immigrants with assistance in a few key areas: representing them as they navigate government ministries and assisting them with their challenges as new immigrants to israel.…

Philanthropy
4
Abrahamic Reunion Inc

The abrahamic reunion works to build sustainable peace with diverse faith communities in the holy land. we foster harmony by exploring common abrahamic values in order to create deep and lasting connections between people.

International
5
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
6
The Jerusalem Connection
7
The American Islamic Forum for Democracy

Aifd's mission is to advocate for the preservation of the founding principles of our u.s. constitution, liberty, and freedom, through the separation of mosque and state. public engagement program provides education to the general public on…

International
8
Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc

Jewish national fund gives all generations of jews a unique voice in building a prosperous future for the land of israel and its people.

International
9
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
10
Sherit Isroel
11
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
12
Int'l Center for Conciliation Inc

The international center for conciliation fosters dignity and cooperation in conflict ridden communities through reconciliation and community preparedness.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Center for Victims of Torture. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM — $950,000 · OtherUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISMJACOB BLAUSTEIN INSTITUTE AJC — $625,000 · OtherJACOB BLAUSTEIN INSTITUTE AJCAJC - JEWISH RELIGIOUS EQUALITY COALITION — $200,000 · OtherAJC - JEWISH RELIGIOUS EQUALITY COALITIONUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT - DODD CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS — $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT - DODD CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTSCONGREGATION BETH EL — $79,940 · Other+7 more — $285,000 · Other+7 moreNEW ISRAEL FUND — $635,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDMEET INTERNATIONAL INC — $240,000 · InternationalMEET INTERNATIONAL INCAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $175,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INCT'RUAH — $75,000 · InternationalT'RUAHTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE — $70,000 · InternationalTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTUREHIAS INC — $50,000 · International+1 more — $180 · InternationalFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC — $280,000 · Youth DevelopmentAVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC — $220,000 · Community ImprovementJEWISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC — $130,000 · ReligionGLIDE FOUNDATION — $35,000 · ReligionGLIDE MEMORIAL CHURCH — $30,000 · ReligionANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $5,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC — $1,800 · PhilanthropySUNFLOWER OF PEACE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Human Services
Other$2,289,940International$1,245,180Youth Development$280,000Community Improvement$220,000Religion$195,000Civil Rights$5,000Philanthropy$1,800Human Services$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND — $635,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC — $280,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMEET INTERNATIONAL INC — $240,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetAVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC — $220,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $175,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC — $130,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetT'RUAH — $75,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE — $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ISRAEL INITIATIVE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 54% of budgetHIAS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC — $1,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUNFLOWER OF PEACE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC
  • Who funds MEET INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds AVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC
  • Who funds T'RUAH
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ISRAEL INITIATIVE INC
  • Who funds HIAS INC
  • Who funds GLIDE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GLIDE MEMORIAL CHURCH
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC
  • Who funds SUNFLOWER OF PEACE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Leo Nevas Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 88%
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leo Nevas Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Leo Nevas Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph