Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leo Hill Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$2.3MPhilanthropy$1.6MReligion$846kHealth$449kArts & Culture$205kYouth Development$125kHuman Services$118kEnvironment$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $801k
  • $250k+7 grants · $5.1M
$320,047
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CU FOUNDATION$1,357,731
Individual grant recipient$1,308,524
BCH FOUNDATION$724,539
PINE STREET CHURCH$660,308
COLORADO COLLEGE$365,440
TRU COMMUNITY CARE$328,765
BOULDER ROTARY FOUNDATION$320,047
MILE HIGH UNITED WAY$204,657
WWII MUSEUM$200,000
5430 FOUNDATION$200,000
BOY SCOUTS$100,000
LIVING TRUTH$96,000
ADAPTIVE ADVENTURES$15,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $494k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $329k → 12%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $45k → 12%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $25k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $80k → 12%IMAGINE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%IMAGINE FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.8M · 15 repeat orgs$518k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$6.8M
$118k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+2%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyPublic BenefitEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COLORADO COLLEGE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $526k · revenue +12%
  • TC
    TRU COMMUNITY CARE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $399k · revenue +30%
  • IF
    IMAGINE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $15k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC
    one grant, 2022 · $80k · revenue +2%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue +27%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
2
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
3
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
4
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
5
University of Northern Colorado Foundation

The foundation is entrusted to provide support and steward donations for the university of northern colorado.

Education
6
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
7
The Denver Foundation

To inspire people and mobilize resources to strengthen our community.

Philanthropy
8
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
9
Colorado Water Trust

To restore water to colorado's rivers.

Environment
10
Kipp Colorado Schools

Kipp colorado's mission is to equip our students with the academic skills and character strengths necessary to succeed in college and careers.

Education
11
Colorado Nonprofit Association

Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.

Community Improvement
12
Colorado Christian University

Serving god by providing christ-centered higher education.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc; the most unlike its peers is American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,463,524 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBCH FOUNDATION: $984,539 · OtherBCH FOUNDATIONPINE STREET CHURCH: $720,308 · OtherPINE STREET CHURCHBOULDER ROTARY FOUNDATION: $390,047 · OtherBOULDER ROTARY FOUNDATION5430 FOUNDATION: $200,000 · OtherWWII MUSEUM: $200,000 · Other+6 more: $276,000 · Other+6 moreUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $1,732,731 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $526,440 · EducationTHE COLORADO COLLEGETRU COMMUNITY CARE: $398,765 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $80,000 · Human Services+2 more: $27,500 · Human ServicesMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC: $262,157 · PhilanthropyAdaptive Adventures: $30,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $20,000 · HealthCOLORADO VETERANS PROJECT: $23,000 · Public BenefitNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL: $15,000 · Environment
Other$4,234,418Education$2,259,171Human Services$506,265Philanthropy$262,157Health$50,000Public Benefit$23,000Environment$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $1,732,731 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $526,440 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTRU COMMUNITY CARE: $398,765 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC: $262,157 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $80,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAdaptive Adventures: $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCOLORADO VETERANS PROJECT: $23,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIMAGINE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT ON EDUCATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds TRU COMMUNITY CARE ↗
  • Who funds MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds Adaptive Adventures ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO VETERANS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT ON EDUCATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leo Hill Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leo Hill Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Leo Hill Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Leo Hill Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leo Hill’s filings →

    More from the funding graph