· Private foundation
Leo C Balzereit Tr Uunitrust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Milagro House | $45,000 |
| Greenwoods Counseling Referrals Inc | $45,000 |
| Homeless Advocacy Project | $41,000 |
| Ackerman Institute for the Family | $35,000 |
| Homeward NYC | $30,000 |
| Heights Philadelphia | $25,000 |
| Community Action Partnership of | $25,000 |
| Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic | $25,000 |
| Education Law Center - PA | $25,000 |
| Children's Community School Inc | $20,000 |
| Children's Advocacy Center | $20,000 |
| Young Womens Christian Association of | $20,000 |
| Support Center for Child Advocates | $20,000 |
| Bridge of Hope Inc | $15,000 |
| TurnAround Inc | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $525k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGREENWOODS COUNSELING & REFERRALS INC6× · 2019–2025 · $245k · revenue +302%
- HAHOMELESS ADVOCACY PROJECT6× · 2019–2025 · $213k · revenue +9%
- HPHUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN4× · 2019–2023 · $211k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- YGYWCA GREATER HARRISBURGone grant, 2019 · $19k · revenue +21%
THE ATTIC YOUTH CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +28%- TCThe Center For Empowerment And Education Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue +38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…
Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…
Transition house is a human services agency dedicated to preventing and ending domestic violence. the agency provides a continuum of housing resources and holistic support for survivors of violence and their children, as well as prevention…
The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.
To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.
Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…
Center for hope and safety, inc.'s ("chs") mission is to assist bergen county, nj victims and survivors of domestic violence, including emotional, economic, sexual and physical abuse. the agency provides emergency and transitional housing,…
The women's resource center empowers survivors by providing trauma-informed services with equity and compassion while working collaboratively with the community to eliminate the root causes of interpersonal abuse.
To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…
To break the cycle of abuse and violence - domestic, sexual and child by providing services that create hope, restore lives and drive social change through education and community collaboration
People's place ii, inc. is dedicated to becoming the agency of choice to help people find their path to growth and independence. to this end, people's place ii, inc. identifies the social and mental health needs of delaware residents and…
The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise Montco Pa and the most unlike its peers is Elev8hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREENWOODS COUNSELING & REFERRALS INC ↗
- Who funds HOMELESS ADVOCACY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds MILAGRO HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WEST END RESIDENCES HDFC INC DBA HOMEWARD NYC ↗
- Who funds ACKERMAN INSTITUTE FOR THE FAMILY ↗
- Who funds Support Center for Child Advocates ↗
- Who funds HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTER OF BALTIMORE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds TURNAROUND INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN & FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY FOOD HUB ↗
- Who funds AFTER SCHOOL ARTS PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds Education Law Center - PA ↗
- Who funds SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN TRANSITION ↗
- Who funds Elev8hope Inc ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE YOUTH HOME ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds TRAVELERS AID SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds HOPEPHL ↗
- Who funds YWCA GREATER HARRISBURG ↗
- Who funds BROADWAY COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE ATTIC YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Center For Empowerment And Education Inc ↗
- Who funds Our Sisters Place Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Betty and Leo Balzereit Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Van Ameringen Foundation Inc · W W Smith Charitable Trust · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Connecticut Community Foundation · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Leo C Balzereit Tr Uunitrust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Family Crisis Center of Baltimore County Inc — 21% of income from government
- Turnaround Inc — 18% of income from government
- Greenwoods Counseling & Referrals Inc — 7% of income from government
- After School Arts Program Inc — 1% of income from government
- Susan B Anthony Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Leo C Balzereit Tr Uunitrust?
Find your warmest path to Leo C Balzereit Tr Uunitrust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.