Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lenovo Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$823k
Granted FY2026still arriving
16
Grants FY2026still arriving
6
States reached
$152k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$1.5MPhilanthropy$1.1MEmployment$617kPublic Safety & Disaster$455kEducation$321kCommunity Improvement$307kHuman Services$215kScience & Tech$210kOther$0
02FY2026 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $683k
$50,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TAKING IT GLOBAL$151,554
LABORATORIA INC$104,000
UNITED WAY$102,484
Individual grant recipient$100,000
GIRLS WHO CODE INC$75,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$50,000
DRESS FOR SUCCESS$35,000
KRAMDEN INSTITUTE$30,000
ILLINOIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE$30,000
ASTRONAUT SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$15,000
BLACK COLLEGIATE GAMING INSTITUTE$10,000
MARBLES KIDS MUSEUM$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $873k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $5k → 8%KRAMDEN INSTITUTE INC: $33k → 11%KRAMDEN INSTITUTE INC: $33k → 11%KRAMDEN INSTITUTE: $30k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $150k → 14%ILLINOIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE: $30k → 14%KRAMDEN INSTITUTE INC: $5k → 11%ILLINOIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE: $30k → 14%ILLINOIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE: $25k → 14%ILLINOIS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE: $25k → 14%ILLINOIS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE: $25k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $150k → 8%GIRLS WHO CODE: $75k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE: $75k → 17%THE NORTH CAROLINA SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONALS: $3k → 8%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $75k → 17%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $35k → 8%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $35k → 8%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $35k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CT
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of Lenovo Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Lenovo Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 16 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2026, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
42

Total granted

$2.5M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+10%

Still filing today

69%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $265k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2021–2022 · $300k · revenue +27%
  • IS
    ILLINOIS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE
    5× · 2021–2026 · $135k · revenue +51%
  • TL
    THE LINKS INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $125k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +1%
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
  • TR
    THE RESOURCE FOUNDATION (LATIMPACTO)
    one grant, 2025 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
3
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
6
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
9
Associated Universities Inc

Associated universities inc (aui) collaborates with the scientific community and research sponsors to plan, build, and operate cutting-edge facilities. we cultivate excellence, deliver value, enhance education, and engage the public.

Science & Tech
10
Institute of Food Technologists

As an organization, the institute of food technologists is focusing its work in four main areas, or "roles and goals." each is wide-reaching and helps to advance our mission.steward for the profession and its community - provide learning,…

—
11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Astronaut Scholarship Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project Syncere. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
21/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFLABORATORIA INC: $589,000 · InternationalLABORATORIA INCGIVE2ASIA: $196,424 · InternationalGIVE2ASIA+5 more: $145,000 · International+5 moreTAKING IT GLOBAL: $302,842 · OtherTAKING IT GLOBALUNITED WAY: $162,714 · OtherUNITED WAYAMERICAN RED CROSS: $150,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSCHILDREN ON THE EDGE: $130,000 · OtherCHILDREN ON THE EDGETHE LINKS INC: $125,000 · OtherTHE LINKS INCIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherTHE RESOURCE FOUNDATION (LATIMPACTO): $100,000 · OtherEDUCANDO BY WORLDFUND: $100,000 · OtherEDUCANDO WORLD EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT FUND: $74,650 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $73,000 · Other+28 more: $621,525 · Other+28 moreUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $1,034,090 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY WORLDWIDEWORLD EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT FUND: $100,000 · PhilanthropyWORLD EDUCATION AND D…+2 more: $20,000 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $300,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nationa…GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $225,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE I…ILLINOIS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE: $135,000 · Human ServicesILLINOIS SCIENCE…DRESS FOR SUCCESS TRIANGLE NC: $105,000 · Human ServicesDRESS FOR SUCCES…KRAMDEN INSTITUTE INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesKRAMDEN INSTITUT…+2 more: $8,000 · Human ServicesASTRONAUT SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $140,000 · EducationWAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $37,000 · EducationPROJECT SYNCERE: $30,000 · EducationGOAL Academy: $20,000 · Education+2 more: $6,000 · EducationAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $15,000 · HealthPROJECT SUNSHINE INC: $14,655 · HealthVista Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired: $5,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $2,500 · HealthSKILLS FOR CHICAGO: $10,000 · Employment
International$1,930,424Other$1,939,731Philanthropy$1,154,090Human Services$873,000Education$233,000Health$37,155Employment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $1,034,090 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLABORATORIA INC: $589,000 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $225,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGIVE2ASIA: $196,424 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetASTRONAUT SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $140,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetILLINOIS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE: $135,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetTHE LINKS INC: $125,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS TRIANGLE NC: $105,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetKRAMDEN INSTITUTE INC: $100,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetWORLD EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT FUND: $100,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetMARBLES KIDS MUSEUM: $55,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $37,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE: $35,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT SYNCERE: $30,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOAL Academy: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT SUNSHINE INC: $14,655 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKILLS FOR CHICAGO: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetADIRONDACK FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEARTHWATCH INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC: $6,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVista Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLATINX EDUCATION CENTER: $3,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONALS INCORPORATED: $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBOOK HARVEST: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds LABORATORIA INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS WHO CODE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVE2ASIA ↗
  • Who funds ASTRONAUT SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE LINKS INC ↗
  • Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS TRIANGLE NC ↗
  • Who funds KRAMDEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds MARBLES KIDS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Junior Achievement of Central Carolinas Inc ↗
  • Who funds WAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SYNCERE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GOAL Academy ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Credit Suisse Americas FoundationNY15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Credit Suisse Americas Foundation · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · AT&T Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Baxter International Foundation · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lenovo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lenovo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lenovo Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lenovo Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lenovo’s filings →

More from the funding graph