Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lenore B & Frank M Heffernan Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$453k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of LENORE B & FRANK M HEFFERNAN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $97k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$371k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ICA CRISTO REY ACADEMY$250,000
MARIN HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,000
ORDER OF MALTA CLINIC OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$50,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES SF$25,000
SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY$25,000
DOMINICAN SISTERS VISION OF HOPE$22,000
HEFFERNAN FOUNDATION$15,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF SAN FRANCISCO$10,000
FINE ARTS MUSEUMS FOUNDATION$5,000
ST JOHN VIANNEY CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ORDER OF MALTA-WESTERN ASSOC: $25k → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%ORDER OF MALTA-WESTERN ASSOC: $25k → 10%ORDER OF MALTA-WESTERN ASSOC: $10k → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5k → 10%BY THE BAY HEALTH: $5k → 8%HOSPICE BY THE BAY: $4k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIESCYO: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 18 repeat orgs$260k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
14

Total granted

$1.6M
$254k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-8%

Still filing today

56%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MG
    MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $185k · revenue +270%
  • PO
    PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $155k · revenue +39%
  • OO
    Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California
    3× · 2017–2024 · $83k · revenue +276%

Funded once

  • DS
    DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MISSION SJ
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • DS
    DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MISSION
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • OO
    ORDER OF MALTA-NORTHERN CA
    one grant, 2019 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
Ucsf Health Community Hospitals Fka Saint Francis Memorial Hospital

Ucsf health community hospital's mission statement is caring, healing, teaching, and discovering.

Health
3
San Francisco Family Foundation
4
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
5
St Francis Foundation of Santa Barbara

The mission of st. francis foundation of santa barbara is to promote and support health care.

Health
6
St Mary's Medical Center Foundation

St. mary's medical center foundation exists to support the mission of dignity health dba, st. mary's medical center. we do this through our encouragement of charitable giving, our stewardship of donor gifts, and our own grant making, which…

Health
7
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
Ucsf Health Medical Foundation

See schedule othe mission of ucsf health medical foundation is threefold: 1) to establish, operate and maintain medical clinics for the provision of healthcare services in california; 2) to promote health by providing, coordinating,…

Health
10
Marin General Hospital

To be the destination for health and healing in the north bay.

Health
11
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
12
Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes

The order of malta is a worldwide, lay, religious order of the roman catholic church, which seeks to glorify god by promoting the sanctification of each member through his or her work with the sick and the poor and witness to the catholic…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Cyo of the Archdiocese of San Francisco and the most unlike its peers is Heffernan Group Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IMMACULATE CONCEPTION ACADEMY — $634,000 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION ACADEMYDOMINICAN SISTERS VISION OF HOPE — $124,705 · OtherDOMINICAN SISTERS VISION OF HOPEDOMINICAN SISTERS OF MISSION SJ — $100,000 · OtherDOMINICAN SISTERS OF MISSION SJCATHOLIC CHARITIES SF — $100,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES SFUC BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $65,000 · OtherDOMINICAN SISTERS OF MISSION — $50,000 · Other+16 more — $145,500 · Other+16 moreMARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $185,000 · HealthMARIN GENERAL HO…Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California — $83,300 · HealthOrder of Malta C…PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE — $155,000 · EducationPRESIDENT…SOVEREIGN MILITARY ORDER OF MALTA WESTERN ASSOCIATION-USA — $60,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MARIN COUNTY — $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE SAN FRANCISCO PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL — $15,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO — $10,000 · Human ServicesBY THE BAY HEALTH — $9,400 · Human ServicesLITTLE WISHES — $8,000 · Human ServicesCollective Impact — $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentHEFFERNAN GROUP FOUNDATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyFINE ARTS MUSEUMS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,219,205Health$268,300Education$155,000Human Services$122,400Youth Development$90,000Philanthropy$25,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $185,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE — $155,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCollective Impact — $90,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetOrder of Malta Clinic of Northern California — $83,300 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSOVEREIGN MILITARY ORDER OF MALTA WESTERN ASSOCIATION-USA — $60,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHEFFERNAN GROUP FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MARIN COUNTY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBY THE BAY HEALTH — $9,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE WISHES — $8,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGOD SQUAD PRODUCTIONS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFINE ARTS MUSEUMS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE
  • Who funds Collective Impact
  • Who funds Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California
  • Who funds SOVEREIGN MILITARY ORDER OF MALTA WESTERN ASSOCIATION-USA
  • Who funds HEFFERNAN GROUP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MARIN COUNTY
  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO
  • Who funds BY THE BAY HEALTH
  • Who funds LITTLE WISHES
  • Who funds GOD SQUAD PRODUCTIONS INC
  • Who funds FINE ARTS MUSEUMS FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA27.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Heffernan Group Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Trust Funds Incorporated · The William G Irwin Charity Foundation · McNabb Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lenore B & Frank M Heffernan Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lenore B & Frank M Heffernan Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Lenore B & Frank M Heffernan Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph