Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lehmann & Quirk Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0170% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$80kReligion$68kEducation$38kHousing & Shelter$7kEmployment$6kArts & Culture$5kHealth$5kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CA INTERFAITH PWR&LIGHT$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN$5,000
NEW ENGLAND INNOCENCE PROJECT$5,000
PINE ST INN INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
THE BISHOP'S RANCH$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,600
CALL OF THE SEA$2,500
GARDENS OF GOLDEN GATE PARK$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PINE STREET INN: $5k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$247k · 12 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$247k
$16k

Still filing today

42%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN
    8× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +42%
  • EI
    Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities
    4× · 2017–2020 · $25k · revenue +146%
  • PINE STREET INN INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $7k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • AF
    AM FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIO OF JS
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CL
    CA LAWYERS FOR THE ARTS
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GDN
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
3
San Francisco Art Institute

Sfai enriched society and the individual by providing students a rigorous education in the fine arts and preparation for a life in the arts through an immersive studio environment, an integrated liberal arts curriculum, and critical…

—
4
Institute for Nonprofit Practice Inc

The institute for nonprofit practice's mission is to transform communities by equipping the most promising nonprofit leaders with the skills, confidence, and resources they need to make their organizations effective, innovative, and…

Human Services
5
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
6
Marin Open Studios

Marin open studios is a non-profit visual arts organization dedicated to engaging and supporting marin county artists and their audiences through events, programs and services. marin open studios champions a diverse and inclusive community…

Arts & Culture
7
CalCef Innovations

Optimizing the clean energy transition - 100%+ clean energy economy for the 100%.

Environment
8
San Francisco Public Press

The mission of the San Francisco Public Press is to enrich civic life by publishing investigative and solutions journalism that engages diverse audiences and promotes public accountability. The San Francisco Public Press…

Education
9
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
10
National Tropical Botanical Garden

To enrich life by perpetuating tropical plants, ecosystems and cultural heritage through discovery, scientific research, conservation, and education.

Environment
11
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
12
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social Good Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Regeneration Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE REGENERATION PROJECT: $66,500 · OtherTHE REGENERATION PROJECTIndividual grant recipient: $51,450 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE BISHOP'S RANCH: $17,500 · OtherTHE BISHOP'S RANCHCA INTERFAITH PWR&LIGHT: $15,000 · OtherCA INTERFAITH PWR&LIGHTIndividual grant recipient: $14,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAM FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIO OF JS: $10,000 · OtherCLIMATEMUSIC: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · Other+6 more: $19,100 · Other+6 moreRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $38,000 · EducationRHODE ISLAND SCH…SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $4,500 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND…Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities: $25,000 · ReligionEpiscopal…PINE STREET INN INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesNEW ENGLAND INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5,000 · Crime & LegalEMPLOYMENT OPTIONS INC: $4,000 · EmploymentCALL OF THE SEA: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentSAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM: $2,500 · Environment
Other$212,050Education$42,500Religion$25,000Human Services$7,000Crime & Legal$5,000Employment$4,000Youth Development$2,500Environment$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE REGENERATION PROJECT: $66,500 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $38,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEpiscopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities: $25,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEMPLOYMENT OPTIONS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE REGENERATION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND INNOCENCE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds EMPLOYMENT OPTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CALL OF THE SEA ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lehmann & Quirk Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lehmann & Quirk Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Employment Options Inc: 100% of income from government
  • New England Innocence Project: 13% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lehmann & Quirk Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lehmann & Quirk Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lehmann & Quirk Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph