Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lehmann & Quirk Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0170% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Environment$80kReligion$68kEducation$38kHousing & Shelter$7kEmployment$6kArts & Culture$5kHealth$5kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CA INTERFAITH PWR&LIGHT$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
NEW ENGLAND INNOCENCE PROJECT$5,000
PINE ST INN INC$5,000
RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
THE BISHOP'S RANCH$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,600
CALL OF THE SEA$2,500
GARDENS OF GOLDEN GATE PARK$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PINE STREET INN: $5k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$247k · 12 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$247k
$16k

Still filing today

42%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN
    8× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +42%
  • EI
    Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities
    4× · 2017–2020 · $25k · revenue +146%
  • PINE STREET INN INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $7k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • AF
    AM FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIO OF JS
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CL
    CA LAWYERS FOR THE ARTS
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GDN
    one grant, 2024 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
3
San Francisco Art Institute

Sfai enriched society and the individual by providing students a rigorous education in the fine arts and preparation for a life in the arts through an immersive studio environment, an integrated liberal arts curriculum, and critical…

4
Institute for Nonprofit Practice Inc

The institute for nonprofit practice's mission is to transform communities by equipping the most promising nonprofit leaders with the skills, confidence, and resources they need to make their organizations effective, innovative, and…

Human Services
5
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
6
Marin Open Studios

Marin open studios is a non-profit visual arts organization dedicated to engaging and supporting marin county artists and their audiences through events, programs and services. marin open studios champions a diverse and inclusive community…

Arts & Culture
7
CalCef Innovations

Optimizing the clean energy transition - 100%+ clean energy economy for the 100%.

Environment
8
San Francisco Public Press

The mission of the San Francisco Public Press is to enrich civic life by publishing investigative and solutions journalism that engages diverse audiences and promotes public accountability. The San Francisco Public Press…

Education
9
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
10
National Tropical Botanical Garden

To enrich life by perpetuating tropical plants, ecosystems and cultural heritage through discovery, scientific research, conservation, and education.

Environment
11
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
12
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social Good Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Regeneration Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE REGENERATION PROJECT — $66,500 · OtherTHE REGENERATION PROJECTIndividual grant recipient — $51,450 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE BISHOP'S RANCH — $17,500 · OtherTHE BISHOP'S RANCHCA INTERFAITH PWR&LIGHT — $15,000 · OtherCA INTERFAITH PWR&LIGHTIndividual grant recipient — $14,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAM FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIO OF JS — $10,000 · OtherCLIMATEMUSIC — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $8,000 · Other+6 more — $19,100 · Other+6 moreRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN — $38,000 · EducationRHODE ISLAND SCH…SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $4,500 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND…Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities — $25,000 · ReligionEpiscopal…PINE STREET INN INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesNEW ENGLAND INNOCENCE PROJECT — $5,000 · Crime & LegalEMPLOYMENT OPTIONS INC — $4,000 · EmploymentCALL OF THE SEA — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentSAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM — $2,500 · Environment
Other$212,050Education$42,500Religion$25,000Human Services$7,000Crime & Legal$5,000Employment$4,000Youth Development$2,500Environment$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE REGENERATION PROJECT — $66,500 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN — $38,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEpiscopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities — $25,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND INNOCENCE PROJECT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEMPLOYMENT OPTIONS INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE REGENERATION PROJECT
  • Who funds RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN
  • Who funds Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND INNOCENCE PROJECT
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC
  • Who funds EMPLOYMENT OPTIONS INC
  • Who funds CALL OF THE SEA
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lehmann & Quirk Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • Employment Options Inc100% of income from government
  • New England Innocence Project13% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lehmann & Quirk Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lehmann & Quirk Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph