· Private foundation
Legacy Of Hope Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $21k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Sidewalk Advocates for Life | $84,500 |
| Hosea Initiative Inc | $8,500 |
| A Woman's Haven Inc | $5,000 |
| Everything Laid Down Ministries | $3,000 |
| Confidence Step | $2,000 |
| Freedom Coaching Foundation | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +230% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SASidewalk Advocates for Life7× · 2017–2024 · $190k · revenue +451%
- MHMIDLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +230%
- WTWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK2× · 2019–2021 · $2k · revenue +77%
Funded once
- AAAll Access Internationalgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +95%
- MOMEALS ON WHEELS - TXone grant, 2017 · $3k
- MRMarthas Ranch Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Habitat for Humanity of Laredo Inc is an affiliate of Habitat for Humanity International Inc. A nondenominational Christian nonprofit organization. Our stated purpose is to create decent affordable housing for those in need and to make…
To build individual houses for needy families in Mexico and direct them to Mexican pastors to further the gospel of Jesus Christ.
We are committed to glorify God through intentional relationships and service to the communities we serve in Honduras. We involve the local community in creating their own solutions to the challenges they face everyday physically,…
Building homes for below poverty level individuals
Dallas area habitat for humanity, inc. is a nondenominational christian not-for-profit organization whose purpose is to sponsor specific projects in habitat development for the dallas, texas area. modest but adequate housing, new or…
To build and rehabilitate homes, with 90% of the profit donated to Christian missionaries or ministries worldwide.
Building houses in partnership with god's people in need
To promote homeownership among dis-advantage families by renovating or building houses for sale to qualified families in the Central Louisiana area.
Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.
Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.
Provide state of the art water filters into the hands of mothers and train them to provide clean water for themselves , their families and others in their communities.
Church planting, missions training, full-time missionary support, Children's ministry and Mercy Ministry to the poor in Mexico, running of home for abandoned girls called Nana's House
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Everything Laid Down Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Sidewalk Advocates for Life ↗
- Who funds All Access International ↗
- Who funds HOSEA INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds A WOMANS HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds EVERYTHING LAID DOWN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM COACHING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Marthas Ranch Foundation ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS TEXAS ↗
- Who funds YUCCA BLOSSOM MONTESSORI ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds LA PROMESA FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Legacy Of Hope Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.