Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leffin Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$245k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$620kInternational$410kReligion$311kHealth$265kHuman Services$117kRecreation & Sports$74kFood & Nutrition$52kCommunity Improvement$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$938k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSION OF HOPE HAITI$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$100,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
VETSTARTS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VETSTARTS: $25k → 11%ROYAL PALM ACADEMY: $500 → 10%VETSTARTS: $20k → 11%VETSTARTS: $10k → 11%VETSTARTS: $10k → 11%VETSTARTS: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MA
MO
TN
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 36% of Leffin Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Leffin Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 9 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
18

Total granted

$1.8M
$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+88%

Still filing today

78%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $575k · revenue +29%
  • CL
    CHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED DBA INSPIRATION MINISTRIES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $223k · revenue +64%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • AM
    A&J MOBILITY
    one grant, 2018 · $33k
  • SO
    SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $16k · revenue +253%
  • UO
    UNIV OF WISCONSIN
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Job Options Inc

To actively seek employment for individuals with psychological or physical disabilities.

Employment
2
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
3
The Halo Trust (Usa) Inc

To protect lives and restore livelihoods of people affected by conflict: 1) to protect lives from the explosive threats and hazards resulting from conflict, 2) to reduce human suffering from armed violence and 3) to build resilient and…

International
4
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
5
Robert a Toigo Foundation

Our mission is to shape the future of finance by developing leaders whose innovation, investment excellence, and human-centered leadership advance the industry and its adjacent sectors.

Education
6
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
7
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

—
8
Options Inc

Options has been improving the lives of hundreds of people with disabilities through maximizing life skills, meaningful work and activities, community inclusion, and providing support beyond the family.

Human Services
9
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Michigan Inc

Goodwill provides exceptional opportunities for people facing employment barriers.

—
10
Feed the Hunger Inc

Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.

—
11
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
12
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Vetstarts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HALFTIME INSTITUTE: $300,000 · OtherHALFTIME INSTITUTECHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED DBA INSPIRATION MINISTRIES: $222,750 · OtherCHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED DBA INSP…Individual grant recipient: $96,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIV OF WISCONSIN ATHLETICS: $72,500 · OtherUNIV OF WISCONSIN ATHLETICSA&J MOBILITY: $33,000 · Other+13 more: $53,843 · Other+13 moreUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $575,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION+1 more: $16,000 · EducationMISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC: $410,183 · ReligionMISSION OF HOPE INC MIS…VETSTARTS INC: $115,000 · Human Services+3 more: $4,797 · Human ServicesCONVOY OF HOPE: $50,000 · InternationalTHE SUNSHINE KIDS FOUNDATION: $2,854 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsTASTE THE IMPACT INC: $100 · Youth Development
Other$778,093Education$591,000Religion$410,183Human Services$119,797International$50,000Health$2,854Recreation & Sports$1,500Youth Development$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $575,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC: $410,183 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetHALFTIME INSTITUTE: $300,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetCHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED DBA INSPIRATION MINISTRIES: $222,750 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetVETSTARTS INC: $115,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCompassionate Care ALS Inc: $3,297 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SUNSHINE KIDS FOUNDATION: $2,854 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoth Hands Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERGREEN FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROYAL PALM ACADEMY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTASTE THE IMPACT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds HALFTIME INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED DBA INSPIRATION MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds VETSTARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Compassionate Care ALS Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SUNSHINE KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Both Hands Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROYAL PALM ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds TASTE THE IMPACT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leffin Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leffin Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leffin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph