Skip to content

· Public charity

Lee Initiative Inc

Administer programs that provide continuing education, job training, mentorship, leadership opportunities and resources to independent restaurant operators and employees.

$2.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
45
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Civil Rights$4.0MEducation$1.5MFood & Nutrition$1.3MEmployment$151kPublic Safety & Disaster$43kReligion$15kCommunity Improvement$11kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k44 grants · $880k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.5M
$20,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$261k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
M FRNACIS INC$1,464,184
SUGAR EUPHORIA$20,000
HALCYON PATISSERIE$20,000
BYRON HOSPITALITY$20,000
CORNROW HTX (BLOOM FOODS)$20,000
THE BLUE FLAMINGO SPORTS BAR AND GR$20,000
THE BLACK LEAF TEA AND CULTURE SHOP$20,000
MEEK'S VEGAN PIZZA$20,000
MADE BY LINO LLC DBA FROM LINO$20,000
BLAK KOFFEE INTERNET CAFE$20,000
VINATERIA$20,000
GOODIES FROZENCUSTARD TREATS$20,000
ADDIS NOLA$20,000
LAGNIAPPE BAKEHOUSE$20,000
ROUX ORLEANS$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OPERATION BBQ RELIEF: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

3%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$229k · 6 repeat orgs$6.8M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
234

Total granted

$229k
$4.5M

Still filing today

0%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEmploymentArts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HISTORIC MAGNOLIA HOUSE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $60k
  • FA
    FLORIDA AVENUE GRILL LLC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $45k
  • KL
    KAH LEGACY ENTERPRISE
    2× · 2021–2023 · $35k

Funded once

  • LI
    LEE INITIATIVE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $151k · revenue -62%
  • 6M
    610 MAGNOLIA
    one grant, 2020 · $122k
  • M
    MITA'S
    one grant, 2020 · $114k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2018 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 284 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
2/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+197 more: $4,324,142 · Other+197 moreM FRANCES INC: $1,464,184 · EducationM FRANCES INCLEE INITIATIVE INC: $151,467 · EmploymentRESTOREOKC INC: $15,000 · Religion
Other$4,324,142Education$1,464,184Employment$151,467Religion$15,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetM FRANCES INC: $1,464,184 over 1y, 83% of budgetLEE INITIATIVE INC: $151,467 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetRESTOREOKC INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds M FRANCES INC ↗
  • Who funds LEE INITIATIVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Urban League IncNY27.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 6 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Urban League Inc · NAACP Empowerment Programs Inc · Feed the Soul Foundation · Detroit Economic Growth Association · Women's Business Development Center · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lee Initiative Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lee Initiative Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lee Initiative Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Lee Initiative Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 284 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lee Initiative’s filings →

    More from the funding graph