Skip to content

· Public charity

Leaving a Positive Legacy Inc

To aid, support and assist by gifts, contributions, or otherwise, other corporations, community chests, funds, and foundations organized and operated exclusively for charitable or educational purposes only.

$157k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

International$105kHealth$96kHousing & Shelter$75kPublic Safety & Disaster$53kEnvironment$40kEducation$28kScience & Tech$22kCivil Rights$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $141,638, the rows itemized in this filing. The $157,047 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,409 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$218k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE AT THE GREEN LIGHT$27,254
HEALTH REEFS FOR HEALTHY PEOPLE$22,602
Individual grant recipient$20,047
HANDS UP FOR HAITI$20,000
NOWELL FAMILY FOUNDATION$15,006
ROCK AND SOUL FOREVER FOUNDATION$10,000
BACKLINE CARE$6,021
SOULSVILLE FOUNDATION$5,000
CONSCIOUS ALLIANCE$5,000
LE BONHEUR CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$5,000
RISE UP GRUNDY$2,150
LEADS INC$2,000
OUR VOICE - ASHEVILLE$375
SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY FARM$375
INDEPENDENT MUSIC AND ARTS OF ASHEVILLE$356
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 76% of grant dollars ($356k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 24% that went abroad ($111k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SWEET RELIEF: $20k → 10%NOWELL FAMILY FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%THE KANICAPILA PROJECT: $10k → 9%Hands Up for Haiti: $20k → 9%Menos Plastico Project: $22k → 16%HEALTH REEFS FOR HEALTHY PEOPLE: $23k → 13%LE BONHEUR CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $5k → 17%RISE UP GRUNDY: $2k → 21%OUR VOICE - ASHEVILLE: $375 → 12%Foodbank of NE Georgia: $11k → 7%Nucis Space: $11k → 27%CONSCIOUS ALLIANCE: $5k → 5%The Source Zero NoCo: $7k → 11%Colorado Healing Fund: $43k → 12%LEADS INC: $2k → 10%ROCK AND SOUL FOREVER FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION: $177 → 22%GRACE AT THE GREEN LIGHT: $27k → 23%Nowell Family Foundation: $12k → 10%HANDS UP FOR HAITI: $20k → 9%HEATHY REEFS FOR HEALTHY PEOPLE: $10k → 13%SOULSVILLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%EASY'S DOG SHELTER: $275 → 21%SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY FARM: $375 → 12%BACKLINE CARE: $20k → 12%The Rock & Roll Forever Found: $6k → 6%GRACE AT THE GREENLIGHT: $18k → 23%Hands up for Haiti: $20k → 9%INDEPENDENT MUSIC AND ARTS OF ASHEVILLE: $356 → 12%BACKLINE CARE: $6k → 12%HANDS UP FOR HAITI: $20k → 9%Hands up for Haiti Inc: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
NJ
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
HI
LA
GA
FL

Beyond the US: 24% of all-years giving ($111k)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Mexico$46k · 3 grants
Dominican Republic$35k · 2 grants
Jamaica$30k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$218k · 5 repeat orgs$249k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -37% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
12

Total granted

$218k
$199k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-37%

Still filing today

100%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentArts & CultureInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HU
    HANDS UP FOR HAITI INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $87k · revenue -23%
  • GA
    GRACE AT THE GREEN LIGHT INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $45k · revenue 0%
  • HR
    Healthy Reefs For Healthy People Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $33k

Funded once

  • Colorado Healing Fund
    one grant, 2021 · $43k · revenue -96%
  • RN
    ROBINS NEST CHILDRENS HOME
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • MP
    Menos Plastico Project
    one grant, 2023 · $22k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Artists and Musicians in Recovery
Education
2
Rocknrecovery Inc

To provide short term assistance resources to music professionals in times of need.

Human Services
3
No Label Media Group Inc

No Label is a nonprofit organization dedicated to breaking down socioeconomic barriers in the music industry through educational initiatives and professional development programs. Through innovative partnerships and comprehensive training,…

Arts & Culture
4
Nashville Blues and Roots Alliance
Arts & Culture
5
We Are All Music Foundation Inc

To strengthen and save lives through music.

Arts & Culture
6
The Sona Foundation

To provide songwriters and composers with resources, support, and programs in mental health, financial wellbeing, career development, and emergency funding to ensure healthy, fulfilling lives for all music creators as they navigate the…

Arts & Culture
7
The Hopeless Foundation Dba Sub City

The mission of the Foundation is to bridge musicians with their fans through the issues that touch their hearts. The Foundation was created with the realization that music touches the lives of young people in ways directly connected to…

Arts & Culture
8
Music for Relief

Comprised of musicians, music industry professionals and fans, music for relief is dedicated to providing aid to natural disaster survivors and protecting the environment.

—
9
The Healing Notes Foundation
Health
10
You Rock Foundation

Public awareness about suicide prevention

—
11
Music Doing Good Inc
—
12
Reverb Inc

Deeply rooted within the music and environmental communities, reverb educates and engages musicians and their fans to take action toward a more sustainable future.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leads; the most unlike its peers is Backline Care Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
3/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROBINS NEST CHILDRENS HOME: $30,000 · OtherROBINS NEST CHILDRENS HOMEMenos Plastico Project: $21,522 · OtherMenos Plastico ProjectIndividual grant recipient: $20,047 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe DREAM Project: $19,000 · OtherThe DREAM ProjectEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur: $17,500 · OtherEl Colegio de la Frontera SurProject Esperanza: $15,892 · OtherProject EsperanzaFoodbank of NE Georgia: $10,500 · OtherFoodbank of NE GeorgiaTHE KANICAPILA PROJECT: $10,000 · OtherTHE KANICAPILA PROJECTFundacin RCD: $7,306 · OtherThe Source Zero NoCo: $6,955 · OtherThe Rock & Roll Forever Found: $6,400 · Other+8 more: $15,531 · Other+8 moreHANDS UP FOR HAITI INC: $87,000 · InternationalHANDS UP FOR HAITI IN…NOWELL FAMILY FOUNDATION: $27,219 · HealthNOWELL FAMILY F…BACKLINE CARE INC: $26,021 · HealthBACKLINE CARE I…THE NUCI PHILLIPS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 · HealthTHE NUCI PHILLI…GRACE AT THE GREEN LIGHT INC: $45,004 · Housing & ShelterGRACE AT T…Colorado Healing Fund: $43,117 · Public Safety & DisasterColorado H…Healthy Reefs For Healthy People Inc: $32,602 · Environment+1 more: $177 · EnvironmentROCK AND SOUL FOREVER FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSOULSVILLE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$180,653International$87,000Health$63,740Housing & Shelter$45,004Public Safety & Disaster$43,117Environment$32,779Arts & Culture$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHANDS UP FOR HAITI INC: $87,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetGRACE AT THE GREEN LIGHT INC: $45,004 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetColorado Healing Fund: $43,117 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHealthy Reefs For Healthy People Inc: $32,602 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNOWELL FAMILY FOUNDATION: $27,219 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetBACKLINE CARE INC: $26,021 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTHE NUCI PHILLIPS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOULSVILLE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRISE UP GRUNDY: $2,150 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLEADS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION: $177 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HANDS UP FOR HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACE AT THE GREEN LIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Healing Fund ↗
  • Who funds Healthy Reefs For Healthy People Inc ↗
  • Who funds NOWELL FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BACKLINE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NUCI PHILLIPS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCK AND SOUL FOREVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOULSVILLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSCIOUS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds RISE UP GRUNDY ↗
  • Who funds LEADS ↗
  • Who funds JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY9.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leaving a Positive Legacy Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leaving a Positive Legacy Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Leaving a Positive Legacy Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Leaving a Positive Legacy Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leaving a Positive Legacy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph