Skip to content

· Private foundation

Learning Bridge Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$246k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$310kEducation$234kReligion$180kHealth$157kInternational$67kFood & Nutrition$55kHousing & Shelter$45kPhilanthropy$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $81k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY (ENDOWED CHARITABLE FUND)$90,000
OSU FOUNDATION (GENERAL SCHOLARSHIP ENDOWMENT)$15,000
VALIANT CROSS ACADEMY$10,000
INTERNATIONAL PROJECT$10,000
ASBURY CHURCH (BALTIC SEMINARY)$10,000
CLAREHOUSE$10,000
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (SCHOLARSHIP)$10,000
PROJECT SANTA CHRISTMAS FUND (SALVATION ARMY)$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
HORIZONS INTERNATIONAL (LEBANON AND ANDREA LIVINGSTON)$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON - CLEAR LAKE$5,000
IGF (GARY AND ANN MURPHY)$5,000
SAN JACINTO COLLEGE (SCHOLARSHIP)$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS - SAN ANTONIO$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TULSA BOYS' HOME: $5k → 15%TULSA BOYS' HOME: $5k → 15%TULSA BOYS' HOME: $4k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $5k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $10k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $10k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $10k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $10k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $5k → 15%STAND IN THE GAP: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
CO
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$848k · 44 repeat orgs$323k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
33

Total granted

$848k
$209k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+10%

Still filing today

41%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma
    4× · 2019–2023 · $60k · revenue +88%
  • VC
    VALIANT CROSS ACADEMY
    5× · 2019–2024 · $50k · revenue +13%
  • Clarehouse Inc
    5× · 2019–2024 · $45k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • OF
    OSU FOUNDATION (BRIGHTER FUTURE FUND)
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • PB
    PEACE BY PIECE THRIFT STORE
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR TULSA SCHOOLS (TULSA LOVES MCCLAIN)
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
2
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
3
Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc

Community action project of tulsa county inc.'s (cap tulsa) mission is to help young children in lower-income families grow up and achieve economic success.

Human Services
4
Crossover Health Services Inc

Crossover health services (chs) envisions a christian healthcare movement where faith, strong relationships, and shared resources drive community restoration and eliminate health disparities. we believe that healthcare is a right, not a…

Health
5
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
6
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
7
The Center for Housing Solutions Inc

Create a community where homelessness is rare, brief, and non-recurring through strong public/private partnerships, using data to guide our strategy, and educate the public on homelessness and its solutions.

—
8
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
9
111 Tulsa Inc

111Tulsa exists to mobilize the local church to see that no child is without a family in Tulsa County.

—
10
City Rescue Mission Inc

Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.

Human Services
11
The Parent Child Ctr of Tulsa Inc

To prevent child abuse and neglect through education, treatment, and advocacy. the parent child center of tulsa (pcct) has been serving the tulsa community and surrounding areas since 1990. in 2024, pcct served more than 96,000 infants,…

—
12
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
27/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY (ENDOWED CHARITABLE FUND): $90,000 · OtherASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY (ENDOWED CHARITABLE FUND)SALVATION ARMY (PROJECT SANTA): $70,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY (PROJECT SANTA)NEW YORK CITY INTERNATIONAL PROJECT INC: $47,934 · OtherNEW YORK CITY INTERNATIONAL PROJECT INCPROJECT SANTA CHRISTMAS FUND (SALVATION ARMY): $35,000 · OtherASBURY CHURCH (BALTIC SEMINARY): $30,000 · OtherRESTORE HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $30,000 · Other+57 more: $531,419 · Other+57 moreMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: $60,000 · HealthMental Healt…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $35,000 · HealthST JUDE CHIL…THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES: $20,000 · HealthTHE CENTER F…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $9,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBRO…FAMILY HOPE HOUSE INC: $7,750 · HealthFAMILY HOPE …Clarehouse Inc: $45,000 · Human ServicesTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesTHE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $5,000 · Human ServicesEmergency Infant Services Inc: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,040 · Human ServicesVALIANT CROSS ACADEMY: $50,000 · EducationThe Griffin School Inc: $5,000 · EducationTulsa Community College Foundation: $5,000 · EducationTulsa Regional STEM Alliance Inc: $2,500 · EducationHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 · InternationalADVOCATES FOR AFRICA'S CHILDREN INC: $10,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 · InternationalCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc: $5,000 · Food & NutritionIRON GATE INC: $15,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 · ReligionMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $5,000 · Religion
Other$834,353Health$131,750Human Services$70,040Education$62,500International$35,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Religion$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: $60,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetVALIANT CROSS ACADEMY: $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetClarehouse Inc: $45,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRESTORE HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIRON GATE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCATES FOR AFRICA'S CHILDREN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY HOPE HOUSE INC: $7,750 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBUILDING ALL CHILDREN INC: $7,591 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetThe Griffin School Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOne Hope Tulsa Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTulsa Community College Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAvenue Community Development Corporation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTulsa Regional STEM Alliance Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTAND IN THE GAP INC: $1,040 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW HOPE OKLAHOMA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma ↗
  • Who funds VALIANT CROSS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Clarehouse Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds RESTORE HOPE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds IRON GATE INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA DAY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA BOYS' HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES FOR AFRICA'S CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK32.1× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Hille Family Charitable Foundation · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · Oneok Foundation Inc · Arvest Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Learning Bridge Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Learning Bridge Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Learning Bridge Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Learning Bridge Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Learning Bridge’s filings →

More from the funding graph