· Public charity
Leah & Edward Frankel Supporting Foundation Inc
The organization is a supporting foundation which makes grants to carry out the purposes of the jewish community foundation of greater metrowest nj, inc.
Read this first · the figures below need context
51% of Leah & Edward Frankel Supporting Foundation Inc’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Jewish Community Foundation Of Greater Metrowest Nj, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 11 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Leah & Edward Frankel Supporting Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- $10k–50k8 grants · $180k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $497k
- $250k+1 grant · $467k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Tikva Children's Home | $467,000 |
| International Fellowship of Christian & Jews | $150,000 |
| Western Wall Heritage | $100,000 |
| Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation | $100,000 |
| Friends of United Hatzalah | $97,000 |
| Jewish Federation of Greater MetroWest NJ | $50,000 |
| Admirals Cove Cares Charitable Fund | $45,000 |
| Temple Beth Am | $38,000 |
| Chabad of Palm Beach Gardens | $36,000 |
| West Jupiter Community Group Inc | $20,500 |
| Joseph Kushner Hebrew Academy | $10,000 |
| Chaverim Israel Family Services | $10,000 |
| Chasin a Dream | $10,000 |
| Jupiter Medical Center Fdtn | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $89k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2021, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTIKVA CORP6× · 2017–2022 · $6.0M · revenue +51%
- WWWestern Wall Heritage Foundation Inc4× · 2018–2021 · $400k · revenue +83%
- ACADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC4× · 2017–2021 · $390k · revenue +197%
Funded once
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE KIEV JEWISH COMMUNITYgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +115%
- AFANNE FRANK CENTER USA INCone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -50%
- TCThe Curetivity Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +371%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.
To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.
The jewish federation of southern new jersey cares for those in need, enhances jewish life and ensures the continuity of a vibrant jewish community locally, in israel and around the world.
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
To strengthen jewish life and identity in our community, provide for jewish people in need and promote support for israel.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.
Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Metrowest Nj and the most unlike its peers is Winners Circle Charities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TIKVA CORP ↗
- Who funds Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ ↗
- Who funds Western Wall Heritage Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ ↗
- Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE HAGEDORN LITTLE VILLAGE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds WEST JUPITER COMMUNITY GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RENEWAL COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE EDUCATION AND WELFARE OF JEWS ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds PALM BEACH DRAMAWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds CHAVERIM ISRAEL FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Rabbinical Organization - Chabad Lubavitch Inc ↗
- Who funds CHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE KIEV JEWISH COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds JACK M BARRACK HEBREW ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds ANNE FRANK CENTER USA INC ↗
- Who funds The Curetivity Foundation ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY FEDERATION OF YOUNG MEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND YOUNG WOMEN'S ↗
- Who funds Furry Friends Humane Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY SUNCOAST INC ↗
- Who funds Adopt-A-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc ↗
- Who funds VITAMIN ANGEL ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT OF NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds WINNERS CIRCLE CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds AF BEST SECURITIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Jewish Communal Fund · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · Admirals Cove Foundation Inc · United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Leah & Edward Frankel Supporting Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Adopt-a-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc — 15% of income from government
- United Way Suncoast Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Leah & Edward Frankel Supporting Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Leah & Edward Frankel Supporting Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.