· Public charity
Lead to Serve Inc
Provides training and other empowerment support activities for individuals, families, communities, and organizations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $198,198 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,054,607 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,856,409 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $136k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SPORTS CATALYST | $55,200 |
| SRS FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| SATALLITE GAMING | $29,000 |
| LOGOSDOR INC | $24,000 |
| WORLD SPORTS | $18,620 |
| WIRED 4 SPORT | $13,918 |
| 7 ADMIRALS LLC | $10,000 |
| REVIVAL SPORT INC | $7,460 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $1.7M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions, $1.4M to organizations and $331k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT · ADMIN AND OPERATING COSTS · SPORTS / LEADERSHIP TRAINING
Stated purpose: COMMUNITY OUTREACH / DEVELOPMENT · SPORTS / LEADERSHIP TRAINING
Stated purpose: SPORTS / LEADERSHIP TRAINING; CONFERENCE TRAINING EXPENSES · SPORTS / LEADERSHIP TRAINING · ADMIN AND OPERATING COSTS
Stated purpose: SPORTS / LEADERSHIP TRAINING · TRAVEL ASSIST FOR TRAINING · MISC TRAINING EXPENSES
Stated purpose: SPORTS / LEADERSHIP TRAINING
Stated purpose: SPORTS / LEADERSHIP TRAINING
Stated purpose: MISC TRAINING EXPENSES
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WSWORLD SPORTS INC6× · 2017–2024 · $616k · revenue +13%
- SCSports Catalyst Inc3× · 2021–2024 · $115k · revenue +5%
- APASIA PARTNERS INC3× · 2020–2022 · $57k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- ORORAL ROBERTS EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -8%
- OLOur Legacyone grant, 2019 · $55k · revenue -44%
BAYLOR UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian sport activites for youth
Sportspersons ministries international exists to connect outdoors people with god, through trust in jesus christ. we do this by offering outdoors events with a ministry focus, aiding churches in their ministry efforts, and connecting…
Religious
The organizations mission is to equip and inspire athletes and coaches to train, compete and live for christ.
Sports leadership development builds relationships, listens and serves. using the acts 1:8 model, we grow in missional relationships to witness and spread the gospel.
SWM Mission is an abbreviation for Silk Wave Mission, and is an organization that serves as a united prayer movement, church planting movement, and missionary church movement for spiritual recovery and revival in Turkey and the Islamic…
Aim to nature and train church leaders and believers alike to be well verse with the knowledge of the Scriptures. The primary vision of the organization is to train leaders and minsters to ground their teaching and preaching on solid…
Religious studies
None
Training pastors and leaders in christian faith
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Revival Sport Inc and the most unlike its peers is Satellite Gaming. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WORLD SPORTS INC ↗
- Who funds LOGOSDOR INC ↗
- Who funds REVIVAL SPORT INC ↗
- Who funds Sports Catalyst Inc ↗
- Who funds ORAL ROBERTS EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ASIA PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds Our Legacy ↗
- Who funds SATELLITE GAMING ↗
- Who funds SRS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc ↗
- Who funds WIRED4SPORT ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN SKATERS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds JSAW xtreme ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Logosdor Inc · International Generosity Foundation Trust · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lead to Serve Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lead to Serve Inc?
Find your warmest path to Lead to Serve Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.