Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ldg Development Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Housing & Shelter$6.7MEducation$242kReligion$83kEmployment$40kYouth Development$25kArts & Culture$25kFood & Nutrition$24kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.4M
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY ADVOCATES FOR RESOURCES & EMPOWERMENT INC$2,397,000
EVOLVE502 INC$50,000
LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC$20,000
PEACE EDUCATION PROGRAM INC$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YouthBuild Louisville: $20k → 15%YOUTHBUILD LOUISVILLE: $20k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.0M · 9 repeat orgs$334k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +138% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$7.0M
$289k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+138%
-2%

Still filing today

67%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionEducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FL
    Feed Louisville Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3.2M · revenue +31% · 46% of their budget
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ADVOCATES FOR RESOURCES & EMPOWERMENT INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +550% · 98% of their budget
  • EI
    EVOLVE502 INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $203k · revenue +215%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $150k
  • DB
    DOUGLAS BLVD CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $83k
  • DT
    DARE TO CARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $24k · revenue +31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rebound Inc

To create positive impact in housing and economic development, while helping families to have access to affordable, quality housing within our historic urban neighborhoods.

2
The Louisville Urban League Inc

As an active partner, leader and catalyst, we will assist african americans, other minority groups and the disadvantaged attain social and economic equality and stability through direct services and advocacy.

Human Services
3
Day Spring Inc

Day spring provides a path forward for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities through services that cultivate hope, belonging, and community.we envision every person being valued and having a path forward regardless of…

Human Services
4
The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc

To mobilize people, networks, and capital to spark meaningful change in and beyond louisville.

Philanthropy
5
University of Louisville Real Estate Foundation Inc

To acquire, maintain, improve, leverage, manage, lease, and convey real and personal property for the benefit of the university of louisville.

Philanthropy
6
New Directions Housing Corporation

New directions creates and preserves homes, fosters community stability and supports families on their path to economic success.

7
Endeavor Louisville Inc

Endeavor Louisville is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio, catalyzing long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in our region.…

International
8
Citizens of Louisville Organized and United Together Inc

The mission of CLOUT is to solve serious community problems by bringing together diverse religious congregations predominantly in low-to-middle income communities of Louisville for leadership training and taking unified action.

Community Improvement
9
Greater Louisville Behavior Health Center

The mission of Greater Louisville Behavioral Health is to provide services surrounding behavioral health and substance abuse, especially to those in the criminal justice system

Human Services
10
The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc

To mobilize people, networks, and capital to spark meaningful change in and beyond louisville.

Philanthropy
11
Thrive By 5 Louisville Inc

Thrive by 5 louisville is making early learning a top priority for louisville, breaking down barriers for the future of our children and city.

Education
12
Lifewell

Lifewell aims to provide hope and recovery through our person-centered residential, outpatient, housing and community living programs. we provide integrated healthcare services to low-income adults with behavioral and physical illness and…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Adult Development in Action Inc and the most unlike its peers is Four Corners Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Feed Louisville Inc — $3,240,000 · Food & NutritionFeed Louisville Inc+1 more — $24,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY ADVOCATES FOR RESOURCES & EMPOWERMENT INC — $2,983,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY ADVOCATES FOR RESOURCES & EMPOWERMEN…+1 more — $20,000 · EducationNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT — $500,000 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCI…EVOLVE502 INC — $202,546 · OtherEVOLVE502 INCIndividual grant recipient — $150,000 · OtherIndividual gran…DOUGLAS BLVD CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $82,500 · OtherDOUGLAS BLVD CH…+7 more — $54,965 · Other+7 moreYOUNG ADULT DEVELOPMENT IN ACTION INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureMARYHURST INC — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentPEACE EDUCATION PROGRAM INC — $5,000 · International
Food & Nutrition$3,264,000Education$3,003,000Other$990,011Human Services$40,000Arts & Culture$25,000Youth Development$25,000International$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFeed Louisville Inc — $3,240,000 over 2y, 46% of budgetCOMMUNITY ADVOCATES FOR RESOURCES & EMPOWERMENT INC — $2,983,000 over 2y, 98% of budgetEVOLVE502 INC — $202,546 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetYOUNG ADULT DEVELOPMENT IN ACTION INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMARYHURST INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDARE TO CARE INC — $24,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSPRING INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEACE EDUCATION PROGRAM INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFour Corners Mission — $500 over 1y, 7.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Feed Louisville Inc
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ADVOCATES FOR RESOURCES & EMPOWERMENT INC
  • Who funds EVOLVE502 INC
  • Who funds YOUNG ADULT DEVELOPMENT IN ACTION INC
  • Who funds THE LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA INC
  • Who funds MARYHURST INC
  • Who funds DARE TO CARE INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WELLSPRING INC
  • Who funds PEACE EDUCATION PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds Four Corners Mission

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Gheens Foundation IncKY19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Gheens Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Jewish Heritage Fund for Excellence Inc · James Graham Brown Foundation Inc · Cralle Foundation Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Lift a Life Foundation Inc · Norton Healthcare Inc · Metro United Way Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ldg Development Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ldg Development Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Ldg Development Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph