Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lawrence True & Linda Brown Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$892k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.5MArts & Culture$1.5MCivil Rights$650kPublic Safety & Disaster$325kCrime & Legal$206kRecreation & Sports$40kFood & Nutrition$35kHealth$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $550k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$15,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOWN HALL SEATTLE$250,000
YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS SCHOOL OF MUSIC$100,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$100,000
CASCADE PBS$100,000
SEATTLE OPERA$50,000
LAW FUNDENDOWMENT FOR EQUAL JUSTICE$50,000
DOWNTOWN EMERGENCY SVC CTR$50,000
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FLAMENCO$25,000
TAPROOT THEATER$15,000
HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION$10,000
UNION ARTS CENTER (ACT)$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION$10,000
AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB$5,000
WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 7% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FLAMENCO: $25k → 14%YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $100k → 12%TOWN HALL SEATTLE: $250k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $100k → 19%ACLU FOUNDATION: $150k → 9%TOWN HALL SEATTLE: $103k → 9%HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%TOWN HALL SEATTLE: $102k → 9%ACLU FOUNDATION: $100k → 9%ACLU FOUNDATION: $100k → 9%ACLU FOUNDATION: $100k → 9%ACLU FOUNDATION: $100k → 9%ACLU FOUNDATION: $100k → 9%A CONTEMPORARY THEATRE: $50k → 9%LAW FUNDENDOWMENT FOR EQUAL JUSTICE: $50k → 9%A CONTEMPORARY THEATRE: $50k → 9%LAW FUNDENDOWMENT FOR EQUAL JUSTICE: $50k → 9%LAW FUNDENDOWMENT FOR EQUAL JUSTICE: $30k → 9%TOWN HALL SEATTLE: $26k → 9%LAW FUNDENDOWMENT FOR EQUAL JUSTICE: $26k → 9%TOWN HALL SEATTLE: $25k → 9%LAW FUNDENDOWMENT FOR EQUAL JUSTICE: $25k → 9%LAW FUNDENDOWMENT FOR EQUAL JUSTICE: $25k → 9%UNION ARTS CENTER (ACT): $10k → 9%TOWN HALL SEATTLE: $10k → 9%A CONTEMPORARY THEATRE: $10k → 9%NORTHWEST HARVEST: $10k → 9%CASCADE PBS: $100k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $1.2M → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $110k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%DOWNTOWN EMERGENCY SVC CTR: $75k → 9%DOWNTOWN EMERGENCY SVC CTR: $50k → 9%DOWNTOWN EMERGENCY SVC CTR: $50k → 9%DOWNTOWN EMERGENCY SVC CTR: $50k → 9%SEATTLE OPERA: $150k → 9%DOWNTOWN EMERGENCY SVC CTR: $50k → 9%BOOK-IT THEATER: $110k → 9%DOWNTOWN EMERGENCY SVC CTR: $50k → 9%SEATTLE OPERA: $100k → 9%SEATTLE OPERA: $50k → 9%SEATTLE OPERA: $50k → 9%SEATTLE OPERA: $25k → 9%SEATTLE OPERA: $25k → 9%TAPROOT THEATER: $15k → 9%BOOK-IT THEATER: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 16 repeat orgs$236k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$3.9M
$236k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+31%

Still filing today

63%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $236k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +7%
  • AC
    A CONTEMPORARY THEATRE INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $110k · revenue +17%
  • NI
    NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FLAMENCO
    6× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • CP
    CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA
    one grant, 2025 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS SCHOOL OF MUSIC
    one grant, 2025 · $100k
  • TT
    TAPROOT THEATER
    one grant, 2025 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
2
Seattle Symphony Orchestra Inc

To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.

Arts & Culture
3
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
4
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
5
Washington Performing Arts Society

Washington performing arts champions the arts as a unifying force. through collaborations with artists, educators, community leaders, and institutional partners, we bring wide-ranging artistic programs to stages, schools, and neighborhoods…

Arts & Culture
6
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
7
Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Seattle Chapter

Arcs foundation advances science and technology in the united states by providing financial awards to academically outstanding u.s. citizens studying to complete degrees in science, engineering and medical research.

Education
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
10
Washington State Academy of Sciences

WSAS provides expert scientific and engineering assessments to inform public policy making and works to increase the impact of research in Washington State.

Science & Tech
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
Technology Association of Oregon

To support our members and promote the growth and quality of oregon's technology industry by providing opportunities for business and professional development through networking and informational programs.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cascade Public Media; the most unlike its peers is National Institute of Flamenco. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACLU FOUNDATION: $650,000 · OtherACLU FOUNDATIONDOWNTOWN EMERGENCY SVC CTR: $325,000 · OtherDOWNTOWN EMERGENCY SVC CTRLAW FUNDENDOWMENT FOR EQUAL JUSTICE: $206,000 · OtherLAW FUNDENDOWMENT FOR EQUAL JUSTICEBOOK-IT THEATER: $125,000 · OtherBOOK-IT THEATERUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS SCHOOL OF MUSIC+9 more: $152,000 · Other+9 moreUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $1,371,408 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATIONYale University: $100,000 · EducationYale UniversityTown Hall Association: $516,150 · Arts & CultureTown Hall AssociationSEATTLE OPERA: $400,000 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE OPERAA CONTEMPORARY THEATRE INC: $110,000 · Arts & CultureA CONTEMPORARY THEATRE INCCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA: $100,000 · Arts & CultureCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIANATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FLAMENCO: $50,000 · Arts & CulturePROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $15,500 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $1,000 · Science & Tech
Other$1,558,000Education$1,471,408Arts & Culture$1,176,150Philanthropy$15,500Science & Tech$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $1,371,408 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTown Hall Association: $516,150 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetSEATTLE OPERA: $400,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetA CONTEMPORARY THEATRE INC: $110,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYale University: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FLAMENCO: $50,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $15,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWING LUKE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Town Hall Association ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE OPERA ↗
  • Who funds A CONTEMPORARY THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FLAMENCO ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WING LUKE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Wyman Youth Trust · Artsfund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lawrence True & Linda Brown Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lawrence True & Linda Brown Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lawrence True & Linda Brown Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lawrence True & Linda Brown Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lawrence True & Linda Brown’s filings →

More from the funding graph