Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lawrence D Starr Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

75% of Lawrence D Starr Charitable Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Greater Kansas City Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Lawrence D Starr Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $50k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’18
7
’20
7
’21
5
’22
6
’23
8
’24
7
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$141kPhilanthropy$106kReligion$27kInternational$20kHealth$7kYouth Development$3kEnvironment$2kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARK UNIVERSITY$15,000
POMONA COLLEGE$10,000
PARK UNIVERSITY$10,000
OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC$5,000
THE NEW REFORM TEMPLE$2,382
THE NEW REFORM TEMPLE$2,000
THE NEW REFORM TEMPLE$2,000
CHABAD ON CAMPUS AT CLAREMONT$1,800
FRIENDS OF CHAMBER MUSIC$1,234
NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION$172
PUBLIC TELEVISION 19 INC$70
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FIRST GENERATION INVESTORS: $500 → 10%KANSAS CITY HOSPICE INC: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of Lawrence D Starr Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Lawrence D Starr Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$190k · 8 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$190k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+85%

Still filing today

75%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • POMONA COLLEGE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $45k · revenue +109%
  • OB
    OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC
    4× · 2018–2025 · $19k · revenue +17%
  • TN
    THE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2024 · $422 · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • KC
    Kansas City Hospice Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +23%
  • OB
    OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • BH
    BENILDE HALLgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chamber of Commerce of Greater Kansas City

Leading the way to the best kc region by convening innovative leaders, collaborating with like-minded organizations, advocating for positive change, and helping small businesses grow.

—
2
Kansas City Symphony

Its mission is to perform great performances for greater audiences. the kansas city symphony will achieve this mission by: - developing an uncompromising performance standard. - advancing the profile and value of the orchestra locally,…

Arts & Culture
3
Kansas City Ballet Association

To inspire and engage through the beauty, power and passion of dance

Arts & Culture
4
University of Kansas Memorial Corporation

The memorial unions function as a concessionaire to the university of kansas for the purpose of operating various enterprises within the kansas union building, the burge union, the debruce center, residential dining halls, and other…

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
7
Kansas Farm Bureau

Kansas farm bureau exists to strengthen agriculture and the lives of kansans through advocacy, education, and service.

—
8
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
9
The Kansas University Alumni Association

We build lifelong relationships that strengthen the university of kansas and the legacy of excellence embodied by its students, alumni, faculty, staff and friends.

Education
10
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
Kansas City Art Institute

The mission of KCAI is to educate artists and designers while honoring the distinct journeys of students. We forge a vibrant community that equips them to become leaders who leverage the creative process to transform the future.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts; the most unlike its peers is Pomona College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARK UNIVERSITY: $95,528 · EducationPARK UNIVERSITYPOMONA COLLEGE: $45,242 · EducationPOMONA COLLEGEOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $19,200 · EducationOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC+1 more: $100 · EducationGreater Kansas City Community Foundation: $106,369 · PhilanthropyGreater Kansas City Community Foundati…+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyNEW REFORM TEMPLE: $22,901 · OtherNEW REFORM …CHABAD ON CAMPUS AT CLAREMONT: $4,420 · OtherCHABAD ON C…OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH: $2,500 · OtherOPERATION B…POWELL GARDENS INC: $2,400 · OtherPOWELL GARD…+2 more: $110 · OtherKansas City Hospice Inc: $6,000 · Human ServicesFIRST GENERATION INVESTORS: $500 · Human ServicesBOYS CLUB OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE FRIENDS OF CHAMBER MUSIC: $1,234 · Arts & CultureTHE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION: $422 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $300 · Arts & CultureKAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $204 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC TELEVISION 19 INC: $190 · Arts & CultureBENILDE HALL: $500 · HealthGREATER LAWRENCE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC: $500 · HealthMETROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT: $250 · Crime & Legal
Education$160,070Philanthropy$106,869Other$32,331Human Services$6,500Youth Development$3,000Arts & Culture$2,350Health$1,000Crime & Legal$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGreater Kansas City Community Foundation: $106,369 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARK UNIVERSITY: $95,528 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPOMONA COLLEGE: $45,242 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $19,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKansas City Hospice Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOWELL GARDENS INC: $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF CHAMBER MUSIC: $1,234 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBENILDE HALL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST GENERATION INVESTORS: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGREATER LAWRENCE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION: $422 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $204 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC TELEVISION 19 INC: $190 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR KANSAS CITY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO26.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · The H & R Block Foundation · Copaken Family Foundation · G Kenneth and Ann Baum Philanthropic Fund · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation · Linda T Watson Family Foundation · Hartley Family Foundation · R C Kemper Charitable Trust 10017800 · William T Kemper Charitable Trust 10015200 · Muriel McBrien Kauffman Family Foundation · Bluescope Foundation North America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lawrence D Starr Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lawrence D Starr Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 40%
  • Greater Lawrence Family Health Center Inc: 40% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lawrence D Starr Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lawrence D Starr Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lawrence D Starr’s filings →

More from the funding graph