· Private foundation
William T Kemper Charitable Trust 10015200
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $290k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AGRICULTURAL FUTURE OF AMERICA | $732,000 |
| DTC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC | $300,000 |
| AMERICAN ROYAL ASSOCIATION | $250,000 |
| AMERICAN ROYAL ASSOCIATION | $210,500 |
| MSU DENVER FOUNDATION INC | $200,000 |
| DUBUQUE COMMUNITY Y | $100,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY DENVER | $100,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY KANSAS WESTERN MISS | $100,000 |
| VFW FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| ALBRECHT-KEMPER MUSEUM OF ART | $75,000 |
| NATIONAL HISPANIC CULTURAL CENTER | $75,000 |
| KC CARE HEALTH CENTER | $50,000 |
| SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK | $50,000 |
| THERE WITH CARE | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $640k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ARAMERICAN ROYAL ASSOCIATION INC6× · 2019–2024 · $3.6M · revenue +55%
- AFAGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA2× · 2023–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +83% · 25% of their budget
- KCKANSAS CITY GIRLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY4× · 2020–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +63% · 31% of their budget
Funded once
- CRCOLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue +87% · 26% of their budget
- KCKANSAS CITY MUSEUMone grant, 2022 · $300k
- MRMISSOURI RESTAURANT ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +7% · 45% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
Kansas farm bureau exists to strengthen agriculture and the lives of kansans through advocacy, education, and service.
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of KCAI is to educate artists and designers while honoring the distinct journeys of students. We forge a vibrant community that equips them to become leaders who leverage the creative process to transform the future.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.
Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
We build lifelong relationships that strengthen the university of kansas and the legacy of excellence embodied by its students, alumni, faculty, staff and friends.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Educational Excellence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
95 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 95 of the 158 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN ROYAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds AGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY GIRLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds COLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DTC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds THE HARRY S TRUMAN LIBRARY INSTITUTE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY CAMPUS FOR ANIMAL CARE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WWI MUSEUM AND MEMORIAL ↗
- Who funds THE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds PEMBROKE HILL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL CITY OPERA HOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BOULDER PRIDE ↗
- Who funds THERE WITH CARE ↗
- Who funds DUBUQUE COMMUNITY Y ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
- Who funds UNION STATION KANSAS CITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND ↗
- Who funds GREENLIGHT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC TELEVISION 19 INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ANGEL HEART ↗
- Who funds YEP Kansas City ↗
- Who funds ALBRECHT-KEMPER MUSEUM OF ART ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Enid and Crosby Kemper Foundation 10018904 · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · R C Kemper Charitable Trust 10017800 · Arvin Gottlieb Charitable Foundation 10015600 · The H & R Block Foundation · R C Kemper Jr Charitable Trust 10023600 · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · The Sosland Foundation · The Francis Family Foundation · G Kenneth and Ann Baum Philanthropic Fund · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization William T Kemper Charitable Trust 10015200 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cape Abilities Inc — 81% of income from government
- Housing Assistance Corporation — 10% of income from government
- The Center for Independent Documentary Inc — 6% of income from government
- Cape Cod Commercial Fishermen's Alliance Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to William T Kemper Charitable Trust 10015200?
Find your warmest path to William T Kemper Charitable Trust 10015200 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.