· Private foundation
Lavoy & Anne Moore Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $46k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YOUNG TEXAS ARTISTS INC | $20,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY TEXAS | $16,000 |
| CONROE ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| INSPIRATION RANCH | $5,800 |
| SALVATION ARMY OF AUSTIN | $5,000 |
| STEPHEN F AUSTIN UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| STEPHEN F AUSTIN UNIVERSITY | $3,000 |
| REDEEMED MINISTRIES | $2,500 |
| THE REFUGE RANCH | $2,500 |
| FIRST METHODIST CHURCH CONROE | $2,500 |
| CRIGHTON THEATRE FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| ANGEL REACH | $2,000 |
| HERITAGE MUSEUM OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| CAMP STEWART FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
24 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YTYoung Texas Artists Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $159k · revenue +218%
- CICONROE ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +94%
- HMHeritage Museum of Montgomery County9× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- CCCOLLEGIATE CATTLEMEN AND CATTLEWOMEN ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2024 · $1k
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCHone grant, 2024 · $700 · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
South texas recovery foundation exists to tear down the strongholds of substance use disorder and transform lives through counseling, education and long-term support. south texas recovery foundation operates an extended recovery center for…
Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.
The range foundation exists to advance education, research, and public benefit activities that support the mission of the range 501(c)(6) in driving innovation and sustainable development in the texas panhandle
The ranch mount pleasant tx is a christian-based temporary residence facility for men who are battling addiction to alcohol/drugs. their mission is as follows: to put god back in the hearts of men, and then in turn, back into their…
The Festival of Texas Fiddling is dedicated to the preservation, presentation, and performance, and education about of all styles of fiddling and fiddle-associated music played historically and currently in the State of Texas.
When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…
To collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret the history of the North Texas Area to inspire an interest in the past for the education and enrichment of people of all ages.
The james bruner-tk ranch, inc. operates personal care facilities for mentally challenged adults, licensed by the texas department of human services. the primary goal of tk ranch is to provide a safe and decent living environment for the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Inspiration Ranch Inc and the most unlike its peers is Heritage Museum of Montgomery County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Young Texas Artists Inc ↗
- Who funds CONROE ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Heritage Museum of Montgomery County ↗
- Who funds THE REFUGE FOR DMST ↗
- Who funds INSPIRATION RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds ANGEL REACH ↗
- Who funds BETA UPSILON CHI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGE RANCH ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN HOME VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lavoy & Anne Moore Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.