Skip to content

· Private foundation

Laurel Wolf Family Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$44kEnvironment$39kEducation$34kInternational$33kHuman Services$13kCrime & Legal$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$3k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,568
Median grant
6
States reached
$538k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
PARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC$2,568
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$2,568
COOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION$2,568
A21 USA INC$2,568
PROTECT OUR WINTERS$2,000
ORGANIZATION FOR SOCIAL MEDIA SAFETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%A21 USA INC: $3k → 11%MISERICORDIA HOME: $6k → 14%A21 USA INC: $2k → 11%ORGANIZATION FOR SOCIAL MEDIA SAFETY: $1k → 14%A21 USA INC: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
OH
CT
CA
CO
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$147k · 11 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$147k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+34%

Still filing today

82%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Oregon State University Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +28%
  • TA
    THE A21 CAMPAIGN INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $23k · revenue +35%
  • PV
    PARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +124%
  • MH
    MISERICORDIA HOMEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +70%
  • University of Chicagograduated
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
2
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
5
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
6
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
7
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
8
Parliamentarians for Global Action

Parliamentarians for global action (pga) is a non-partisan ngo network of legislators from all regions of the world acting in their individual capacity to advocate for human rights, democracy, and the rule of law; peace and human security;…

International
9
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
10
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
11
The Poptech Institute

Poptech's mission is to accelerate the positive impact of world-changing people, projects and ideas. founded in 1996 by bob metcalfe (inventor, ethernet) and john sculley (apple, pepsi), poptech originally provided a forum to critically…

Education
12
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cool Earth Action Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE A21 CAMPAIGN INC: $22,830 · OtherTHE A21 CAMPAIGN INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION: $15,893 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEA…MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSONS: $4,869 · OtherMICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR…PARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC: $17,902 · HealthPARKINSON VOICE PROJECT I…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $16,901 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERA…PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $4,154 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS AN…Oregon State University Foundation: $30,000 · EducationOregon State University…University of Chicago: $3,500 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoCOOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION: $2,568 · EducationCOOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATI…PROTECT OUR WINTERS: $14,643 · EnvironmentPROTECT OUR WI…COOL EARTH ACTION USA INC: $5,500 · EnvironmentCOOL EARTH ACT…THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER …A21 USA INC: $6,722 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA HOME: $5,587 · Human ServicesORGANIZATION FOR SOCIAL MEDIA SAFETY: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE CLEAR FUND: $8,000 · PhilanthropySANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $6,700 · Crime & LegalCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $3,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$43,592Health$38,957Education$36,068Environment$22,643Human Services$13,309Philanthropy$8,000Crime & Legal$6,700Public Safety & Disaster$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOregon State University Foundation: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE A21 CAMPAIGN INC: $22,830 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC: $17,902 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $16,901 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION: $15,893 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPROTECT OUR WINTERS: $14,643 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA21 USA INC: $6,722 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $6,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME: $5,587 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOL EARTH ACTION USA INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $4,154 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Laurel Wolf Family Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Laurel Wolf Family Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Laurel Wolf Family Fdn?

Find your warmest path to Laurel Wolf Family Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Laurel Wolf Family Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph