· Private foundation
Laurel Ridge Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LIGONIER VALLEY SCHOOL DIST FOUND | $5,000 |
| BRADDOCK'S BATTLEFIELD HISTORY MUSE | $4,432 |
| GREENSBURG HEMPFIELD AREA LIBRARY | $4,000 |
| ANIMAL FRIENDS | $4,000 |
| LIGONIER VALLEY YMCA | $3,000 |
| LOYALHANNA WATERSHED ASSOC INC | $3,000 |
| KEYSTONE BULLDOG RESCUE SWPA | $2,500 |
| SOUTHERN TIER ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES | $2,500 |
| THE STONEYBROOK FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| FORT LIGONIER | $2,500 |
| VARIETY THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY | $2,500 |
| LIGONIER VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| SOUTHERN ALLEGHNEY MUSEUM OF ART | $1,500 |
| WESTMORELAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $1,358 |
| LAUGHLINTOWN COMMUNITY CTR | $1,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FLFORT LIGONIER ASSOCIATION2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +2%
- GHGREENSBURG HEMPFIELD AREA LIBRARY2× · 2023–2024 · $9k · revenue +24%
- STSOUTHERN TIER ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES INC2× · 2023–2024 · $8k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- CLCOMMUNITY LIVER ALLIANCEone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue 0%
- LVLIGONIER VALLEY LIBRARYone grant, 2023 · $2k
- VYVALLEY YOUTH NETWORKone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide public library services for the community, including programs, educational research and reading materials.
To preserve the legacy of the Ligonier Valley Rail Road, conserve its vestiges, collect its relics & memorabilia, and educate the public about railroad history in the Ligonier Valley.
Provide shelter for homeless animals and prevent animal cruelty
Promote civic, commercial, recreational, historical, environmental and general interest in the ligonier valley of westmoreland county pennsylvania
Full-service animal shelter, animal care, adoptive services, humane investigaation services and humane education.
The prevention of cruelty of animals, the relief of suffering among animals, the enforcement of all laws for the protection and prevention of their suffering, and the extension of humane education.
Provide library services
We protect animals, provide a safe haven, and promote innovative programs and services to help both people and animals in need throughout berks county.
To strengthen sense of community across the lackawanna valley by providing spaces and events for community connection and engagement.
Literacy Volunteers of Washington County assists adults interested in improving their literacy skills through free programs based on a participant's individual goals. Our services include: adult basic literacy, English for speakers of…
Leading the way in providing a compassionate, safe community for animals and people through progressive life-saving programs, services, resources, and education.
Public library services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loyalhanna Watershed Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ligonier Valley Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FORT LIGONIER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GREENSBURG HEMPFIELD AREA LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN TIER ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES INC ↗
- Who funds LOYALHANNA WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds STONEYBROOK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Animal Friends Inc ↗
- Who funds LIGONIER VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LIGONIER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LIVER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Variety the Childrens Charity ↗
- Who funds LIGONIER VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds VALLEY YOUTH NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ACTION FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Rk Mellon Family Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Tomahawk Hill Foundation · The Dorothy Babcock Family Charitable Foundation · Summit Foundation · Katherine Mabis McKenna Foundation · Roy a Hunt Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Robertshaw Charitable Foundation · Honkus-Zollinger Charitable Foundation · Eden Hall Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Laurel Ridge Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Laurel Ridge Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Laurel Ridge Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.