Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lato Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$205kEducation$77kInternational$43kHousing & Shelter$24kAnimals$16kSocial Science$13kArts & Culture$8kScience & Tech$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$656k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WI CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN STUDY$10,000
GLOBAL SCHOLARS$8,500
MILWAUKE RESCUE MISSION$7,500
BROOKLINK INC$7,000
TELLING THE TRUTH$6,000
COMMISSION MINISTERS NETWORK$5,000
KINGDOM PREP ACADEMY$5,000
GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC$4,000
FRONTIERS$4,000
CLAPHAM INSTITUTE$4,000
UNITED WORLD MISSION$2,000
ADVANCED STUDIES IN CULTURE$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 22% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CLAPHAM INSTITUTE: $6k → 9%COMMISSION MINISTERS NETWORK: $5k → 13%STACEY ELIZABETH MAYER FOUNDATION: $3k → 5%OZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $5k → 6%MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION: $8k → 17%WORLDWIDE HEART TO HEART MINISTRIES: $5k → 8%GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC: $4k → 8%IN MEDIA RES: $3k → 8%CLPHAM INSTITUTE: $6k → 6%GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $5k → 9%TELLING THE TRUTH INC: $33k → 5%MILWAUKE RESCUE MISSION: $8k → 17%GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK: $4k → 8%CLAPHAM INSTITUTE: $4k → 6%TELLING THE TRUTH INC: $25k → 5%MILWAUKE RESCUE MISSION: $8k → 17%GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC: $4k → 8%WI CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN STUDY: $13k → 5%KINGDOM PREP ACADEMY: $6k → 17%WISCONSIN CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN ST: $10k → 5%KINGDOM PREP ACADEMY: $5k → 17%WI CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN STUDY: $10k → 5%KINGDOM PREP ACADEMY: $4k → 17%WI CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN STUDY: $10k → 5%MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION: $8k → 5%GLOBAL SCHOLARS: $8k → 5%GLOBAL SCHOLARS: $8k → 5%WISCONSIN CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN STUD: $8k → 5%MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION: $8k → 5%CLAPHAM INSTITUTE: $7k → 5%CLAPHAM INSTITUTE: $7k → 5%GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $6k → 5%BROOKLINK INC: $6k → 5%GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $5k → 5%FRONTIERS: $5k → 5%FRONTIERS: $5k → 5%KINGDOM PREP ACADEMY: $4k → 5%BROOKLINK INC: $4k → 5%GLOBAL SERVICES NETWORK: $4k → 5%IN MEDIAS RES: $4k → 5%IN MEDIAS RES: $4k → 5%GLOBAL SERVICES NETWORK: $4k → 5%TELLING THE TRUTH: $13k → 5%BROOKLINK INC: $7k → 5%TELLING THE TRUTH: $7k → 5%BROOKLINK INC: $7k → 5%TELLING THE TRUTH: $6k → 5%BROOKLINK INC: $5k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
OR
VA
MD
AZ
KS
NC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$365k · 19 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against -20% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
8

Total granted

$365k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
-20%

Still filing today

32%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ADMIRATO INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +43%
  • BI
    BROOKLINK INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $29k · revenue +89%
  • MF
    MIO Frontiers
    3× · 2022–2024 · $12k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • WC
    WISCONSIN CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN ST
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • GD
    GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -85%
  • WH
    WORLDWIDE HEART TO HEART MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
4
Global Opportunities for Christinc

Support indigenous christian missions overseas

Religion
5
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
6
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

7
GlobalChurch Inc

To equip the global Church for discipleship, service, and impactful collaboration with the goal of fulfilling the Great Commission of Jesus Christ.

Religion
8
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
9
Globeworks International Inc

International missions and evangelism

Religion
10
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
11
God's Bible School College & Missionary Training Home

God's bible school and college seeks to glorify god and to serve his church by providing higher education centered in holy scripture and shaped by wesleyan conviction, thus preparing faithful servants to proclaim jesus christ and spread…

Education
12
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Scholars and the most unlike its peers is Stacey Elizabeth Mayer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION — $39,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSIONBROOKLINK INC — $29,000 · OtherBROOKLINK INCGLOBAL SCHOLARS — $25,500 · OtherGLOBAL SCHOLARSKINGDOM PREP ACADEMY — $18,500 · OtherKINGDOM PREP ACADEMYGLOBAL SCHOLARS — $15,000 · OtherGLOBAL SCHOLARSCLAPHAM INSTITUTE — $13,000 · OtherCLAPHAM INSTITUTEGLOBAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES — $11,000 · OtherWISCONSIN CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN ST — $10,000 · OtherFRONTIERS — $9,000 · OtherIN MEDIAS RES — $8,000 · OtherGLOBAL SERVICES NETWORK — $8,000 · OtherMESA GLOBAL — $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $7,500 · Other+4 more — $16,500 · Other+4 moreTELLING THE TRUTH INC — $83,000 · ReligionTELLING THE TRUTH INCADMIRATO INC — $40,000 · ReligionADMIRATO INCCLAPHAM INSTITUTE INC — $15,500 · ReligionCLAPHAM INSTITUTE INCMIO Frontiers — $12,000 · ReligionMIO Frontiers+1 more — $5,000 · ReligionGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC — $12,000 · EducationOZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $4,500 · EducationStacey Elizabeth Mayer Foundation Inc — $3,000 · EducationIN MEDIAS RES — $3,000 · EducationGLOBAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC — $5,000 · InternationalWORLDWIDE HEART TO HEART MINISTRIES — $5,000 · International
Other$218,000Religion$155,500Education$22,500International$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTELLING THE TRUTH INC — $83,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetADMIRATO INC — $40,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetBROOKLINK INC — $29,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetGLOBAL SCHOLARS — $25,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCLAPHAM INSTITUTE INC — $15,500 over 3y, 11% of budgetGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetWORLDWIDE HEART TO HEART MINISTRIES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $4,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetStacey Elizabeth Mayer Foundation Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetIN MEDIAS RES — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TELLING THE TRUTH INC
  • Who funds ADMIRATO INC
  • Who funds BROOKLINK INC
  • Who funds GLOBAL SCHOLARS
  • Who funds CLAPHAM INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds MIO Frontiers
  • Who funds GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC
  • Who funds GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC
  • Who funds COMMISSION MINISTERS NETWORK
  • Who funds WORLDWIDE HEART TO HEART MINISTRIES
  • Who funds OZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds Stacey Elizabeth Mayer Foundation Inc
  • Who funds IN MEDIAS RES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA13× affinity10 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lato Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph