How much did LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION reported 2 grants totaling $519,220 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION based?

LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION is based in CA.

LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION

Promotion and support of latino culture in california, increased participation of latinos and latinas in california society, to educate the public about latino culture and heritage issues of importance to latinos and latinas in california.

$519k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$15k

Largest

01What you fund

0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$65kCivil Rights$58kYouth Development$56kRecreation & Sports$50kArts & Culture$50kHuman Services$12kHousing & Shelter$7kCrime & Legal$5kOther$62k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

voterlow moderateagriculturalassetsvotersyoungeconomic

2019

youngbuildleadership

2020

—

2021

build

2022

education

2023

—

2024

contributions

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k1 grant · $15k

$14,975

Median grant

States reached

$244k

Total assets

Largest grants

CALIFORNIA LGBTQ FOUNDATION$14,975
HISPANAS ORGANIZED FOR POLITICAL EQUALITY - CALIFORNIA$7,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Arizona Latin-American

Unclassified

California State University Dominguez

The organization's primary purpose is to assist csu, dominguez hills in various activities.

—

Latinas Usa

Community Improvement

Uc San Diego Foundation

To advocate and raise private support for the university of california san diego, for the purpose of its research, teaching and public service mission.

Education

Voice of San Diego

Investigative journalism for a better san diego.

Arts & Culture

Latinas On the Plaza

—

Chicano Research Center

Education

Latino Political Network

—

San Diego State University Foundation

To support and further the research, education and community service objectives of san diego state university.

Education

San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

Inspire diverse audiences through exhibitions, education, publications & collections.

Arts & Culture

Museo Eduardo Carrillo

Arts & Culture

Latinojustice Prldef

Latinojustice prldef uses and challenges laws to create a more just and equitable society. we transform harmful systems, empower our communities, fight for racial justice, and grow the next generation of lderes.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voto Latino Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Riverside Art Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1/25

the rest of the field

13%

9,472/73,469

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/21

Grantees still filing

16/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$64,975Other$74,000Civil Rights$57,500Youth Development$56,000Recreation & Sports$50,000Arts & Culture$50,000Human Services$12,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA17.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The California Endowment · Weingart Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · California Humanities · The James Irvine Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FONTANA PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FND.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing; revenue up 24.2× since.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 383955704 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FONTANA PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FND, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 15% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation?

More from the funding graph

LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation?

More from the funding graph