· Private foundation
Larry R Coffey Charitable Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $298k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $223k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FLORIDA COLLEGE | $100,000 |
| YMCA OF GRATER LOUISVILLE | $65,000 |
| NORTH TERRACE CHURCH OF CHRIST | $57,850 |
| BRONX BILINGUAL CHURCH OF CHRIST | $34,800 |
| SCHOOL OF GOOD WORKS | $32,000 |
| OFF THE CHAIN MINISTRIES INC | $30,000 |
| INDIAN CHRISTIAN EVANGELIZATION | $28,000 |
| FLORIDA GATEWAY MINISTRIES INC | $21,000 |
| SMALL TRACTS CHURCH OF CHRIST | $20,000 |
| UNIVERSITY CHURCH OF CHRIST | $18,000 |
| RED CROSS | $15,000 |
| MORAL LIGHTS | $14,400 |
| EASTSIDE CHURCH OF CHRIST | $13,200 |
| CHESTER CHURCH OF CHRIST | $12,000 |
| COLUMBUS STREET CHURCH OF CHRIST | $12,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $155k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.
34 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- ICIndian Christian Evangelization5× · 2020–2024 · $103k · revenue +436% · 33% of their budget
- OTOFF The Chain Ministries Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $87k · revenue +27%
- TCTAYLORSVILLE CHURCH OF CHRIST4× · 2020–2023 · $60k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $105k · revenue +38%
- DHDOUGLAS HILLS CHURCH OF CHRISTone grant, 2021 · $18k
- ECEASTSIDE CHURCH OF CHRISTone grant, 2020 · $16k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Minister to the spiritual needs of people, primarily through the publication of literature consistent with biblical principles and through grants to other charitable entities.
Across nations is dedicated to spreading the gospel through establishing, developing and promoting all aspects of church ministry.
Church organization
Teaching and Spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Charis Bible Colleges, Inc. (CBC) was established to train and equip individuals to carry out the Gospel of Jesus Christ through practical application through mentoring, training, and teaching.
Ministry
To train preachers and bible class teachers for the church of christ
The Church trains and equips believers as leaders who can carry the Gospel of Jesus Christ in to the world.
Religious ministry
Church
Ministering to the homeless
Bible Translation and acts of Christian Services
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Indian Christian Evangelization ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds OFF The Chain Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds TAYLORSVILLE CHURCH OF CHRIST ↗
- Who funds SACRED SELECTIONS ↗
- Who funds the Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Larry R Coffey Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Larry R Coffey Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.
- Florida College Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Larry R Coffey Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Larry R Coffey Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Larry R Coffey’s filings →