Skip to content

· Private foundation

Larry L and Kathleen D Dill Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$20kArts & Culture$14kHuman Services$7kHealth$6kAnimals$2kEducation$2kFood & Nutrition$1kInternational$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
4
States reached
$34k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,000
YMCA OF PICKAWAY COUNTY$250
SMILE TRAIN$250
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$250
ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$250
HUMANE SOCIETY$250
FAITH MISSION$200
JUDICIAL WATCH$100
SANTAS SILENT HELPERS$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $450 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $400 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%ANDREWS HOUSE: $500 → 5%POLK FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%HONOR FLIGHT: $250 → 15%POLK FOUNDATION: $200 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
CA
KS
TN
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$47k · 14 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
19

Total granted

$47k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+41%

Still filing today

50%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterAnimalsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $3k · revenue +145%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +19%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • UU
    UTICA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -3%
  • KF
    KOMEN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $600
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
4
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
5
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
6
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
8
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health
9
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
10
St James Hospital

St. james hospital is committed to the health and wellness of the communities we serve by providing the highest quality of care in a compassionate and trusted environment.

Health
11
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
12
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $15,851 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJACK HANNA LEGACY SOCIETY: $11,000 · OtherJACK HANNA LEGACY SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $3,540 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTOLEDO ART MUSEUM: $3,000 · OtherTOLEDO ART MUSEUMSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,200 · Other+15 more: $6,525 · Other+15 morePOLK FOUNDATION: $2,200 · Human ServicesPOLK FOUND…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,100 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WA…ANDREWS HOUSE INC: $500 · Human ServicesANDREWS HO…HONOR FLIGHT INC: $250 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,050 · HealthHEALTHY WORTHINGTON RESOURCE CENTER AND FOOD PANTRY INC: $500 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $200 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthUTICA UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $250 · EducationFAITH MISSION INC: $850 · Housing & ShelterTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $500 · InternationalJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $450 · Public BenefitCOLUMBUS HUMANE: $100 · Animals
Other$42,116Human Services$5,150Health$3,850Education$1,250Housing & Shelter$850International$500Public Benefit$450Animals$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,050 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUTICA UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH MISSION INC: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSantas Silent Helpers of Columbus Inc: $600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHY WORTHINGTON RESOURCE CENTER AND FOOD PANTRY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANDREWS HOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHONOR FLIGHT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING WITH XXY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS HUMANE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds POLK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds UTICA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FAITH MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Santas Silent Helpers of Columbus Inc ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY WORTHINGTON RESOURCE CENTER AND FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDREWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds HONOR FLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIVING WITH XXY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS HUMANE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Delaware County Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Larry L and Kathleen D Dill Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Larry L and Kathleen D Dill Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Larry L and Kathleen D Dill Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Larry L and Kathleen D Dill Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Larry L and Kathleen D Dill Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph