Skip to content

· Private foundation

Laposta-Banketas Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$311k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$196k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.2MReligion$800kAnimals$81kFood & Nutrition$49kRecreation & Sports$23kYouth Development$18kHealth$12kEmployment$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $275k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$196,000
WEIRTON CHIRSTIAN CENTER$79,452
HOPE PROJECT FUMC$20,046
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK$3,000
HANCOCK COUNTY HUMANE FOUNDATION$2,000
OLD FRIENDS CABIN CREEK$2,000
OLD FRIENDS INC$2,000
DUNBAR RECREATION CENTER$1,500
DISABILITY ACTION CENTER$1,500
WV CHRISTIAN YOUTH CAMP$1,000
SPECIAL CONNECTIONS$1,000
HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC$1,000
FRITZ WILLIAMS SCHOLARSHIP FUND$800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CANINE ANGELS: $5k → 13%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $3k → 15%DISABILITY ACTION CENTER: $4k → 15%CANINE ANGELS: $5k → 13%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $3k → 15%DISABILITY ACTION CENTER: $3k → 15%CANINE ANGELS: $5k → 13%The House of the Carpenter: $3k → 15%DISABILITY ACTION CENTER: $3k → 15%CANINE ANGELS: $4k → 13%The House of the Carpenter: $3k → 15%DISABILITY ACTION CENTER: $2k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $2k → 15%The House of the Carpenter: $2k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $2k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $1k → 15%Weirton Senior Citizens Center: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NV
OH
PA
KY
WV
VA
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 35 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
13

Total granted

$2.2M
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+2%

Still filing today

31%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsReligionEmploymentScience & TechYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UM
    URBAN MISSION MINISTRIES INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $33k · revenue +74%
  • CA
    CANINE ANGELS INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $19k · revenue +198%
  • TH
    THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • OD
    OPEN DOOR BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $17k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY OF GRAYSON COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • WH
    WEIRTON HEIGHTS MEMORIAL BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne County Humane Society

Finding committed, permanent homes for companion animals in our community; measurably reducing companion animal overpopulation; educating and promoting humane values.

Animals
2
Humane Society Waterville Area

Care for homeless animals

Animals
3
Huntington County Humane Society Inc

The huntington county humane society exists to protect and provide shelter for animals and to encourage the humane treatment of all animals in huntington county.

Animals
4
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
5
The Washington County Humane Society Inc

Rescue and care for stray or unwanted animals.

Animals
6
Wayne County Humane Society

The humane society of wayne county provides assistance in pet population control, shelter for lost, abused, and neglected animals, and education for the general public in order to assist them in the proper care and maintenance of pets.

Animals
7
Union County Humane Society

The union county humane society promotes the welfare of animals through sheltering and adoption services, basic veterinary care (including spay/neuter, vaccination, microchipping, humane euthanasia), animal

Animals
8
Humane Society of Clinton County Inc

To provide for the humane treatment of animals in clinton county, indiana

Animals
9
Lycoming County Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Full-service animal shelter, animal care, adoptive services, humane investigaation services and humane education.

Animals
10
Humane Society of Vero Beach and Indian River County Inc

None

Animals
11
Western Carolina Rescue Ministries Inc

Provide food, shelter, rehabilitation and christian ministry to the poor and homeless

Housing & Shelter
12
Herkimer County Humane Society

Provide shelter and humane treatment of animals of herkimer county including spaying and neutering

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The House of the Carpenter Inc; the most unlike its peers is Southwest Butler Food Cupboard Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEIRTON CHRISTIAN CENTER INC: $1,150,014 · OtherWEIRTON CHRISTIAN CENTER INCHOPE PROJECT FUMC: $396,316 · OtherHOPE PROJECT FUMCFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $236,946 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH+37 more: $310,775 · Other+37 moreCANINE ANGELS INC: $18,500 · Human ServicesTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $17,500 · Human ServicesTHE DISABILITY ACTION CENTER INC: $10,500 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesHOUNDS HAVEN INC: $17,070 · AnimalsHANCOCK COUNTY HUMANE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · AnimalsOld Friends Inc: $3,000 · AnimalsSOUTHWEST BUTLER FOOD CUPBOARD INC: $16,000 · Food & NutritionTHE HIGH ROCKS EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION: $9,000 · EmploymentLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $4,000 · Science & TechBLUE STREAM FARMS CORPORATION: $1,500 · Youth Development
Other$2,094,051Human Services$47,500Animals$30,070Food & Nutrition$16,000Employment$9,000Science & Tech$4,000Youth Development$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEIRTON CHRISTIAN CENTER INC: $1,150,014 over 9y, 47% of budgetURBAN MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $33,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCANINE ANGELS INC: $18,500 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $17,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHOUNDS HAVEN INC: $17,070 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetSOUTHWEST BUTLER FOOD CUPBOARD INC: $16,000 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetTHE DISABILITY ACTION CENTER INC: $10,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHANCOCK COUNTY HUMANE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTHE HIGH ROCKS EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION: $9,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOld Friends Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE STREAM FARMS CORPORATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER WEIRTON SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWorld Help: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE TELEVISION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEIRTON CHRISTIAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CANINE ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUNDS HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST BUTLER FOOD CUPBOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DISABILITY ACTION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HANCOCK COUNTY HUMANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HIGH ROCKS EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Old Friends Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charles M Pugliese and Thelma M Pugliese Charitable FoundationOH15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charles M Pugliese and Thelma M Pugliese Charitable Foundation · Hancock County Savings Charitable Foundation · Starvaggi Charities Inc · John C Williams Charitable Tr 8024 · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Eqt Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Laposta-Banketas Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Laposta-Banketas Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Laposta-Banketas Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph