· Private foundation
John C Williams Charitable Tr 8024
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $416k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $43,938 |
| OHIO VALLEY HEALTH CENTER | $30,000 |
| Ohio Valley Youth Network | $30,000 |
| JEFFERSON COUNTY AMIMAL WELFARE | $25,000 |
| WEIRTON CHRISTIAN CENTER | $24,971 |
| WEST VIRGINIA NORTHERN COMMUNITY | $20,000 |
| OFFICE OF SOCIAL MINISTRY | $20,000 |
| AIM WOMENS CENTER | $16,733 |
| THE STEUBENVILLE CULTURAL TRUST | $15,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $15,000 |
| VAGABOND MISSIONS | $15,000 |
| A CARING PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER | $15,000 |
| YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
35 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OVOHIO VALLEY HEALTH CENTER8× · 2017–2025 · $245k · revenue +218% · 40% of their budget
- BOBOARD OF PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION4× · 2017–2021 · $175k · revenue +152%
- UMURBAN MISSION MINISTRIES INC3× · 2018–2021 · $106k · revenue +74%
Funded once
- WHWIER HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2022 · $50k
- TSTRI STATE UNITED SOCCER LTDone grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue -5% · 43% of their budget
- SJST JOSEPHS PARISH GRADE SCHOOLone grant, 2017 · $33k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio serves and empowers people through God's love in their times of vulnerability. We do so through a full range of local services that engage the community in building solidarity.
To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…
Provide adoption, counseling services, and refugee assistance
Catholic Charities Terre Haute is a comprehensive, direct services agency whose purpose is to serve the poor, the homeless, the elderly, the neglected children and the needy.
Inspired by the church's social teachings, catholic charities west michigan fosters individuals and families to flourish by providing help and creating hope.
We are a religious-based 501c3 non-profit to provide community support for mothers and babies.
Habitat for humanity of cleveland is a non-profit christian housing ministry. habitat works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities for people in need by building and selling houses…
The mission of Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank is to feed the hungry in Clay, Greene, Knox, Parke, Sullivan, Vermillion and Vigo counties through a network of emergency food distribution member agencies and engage our community in…
See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…
Ending homelessness in stark county ohio.
Columbus alliance for battered women provides emergency shelter, security, crisis intervention, and advocacy for adult and child victims of domestic violence.
The west side catholic center provides food, clothing, shelter, and advocacy to all who come to us in need. through various programs, we serve the homeless and indigent of cleveland, ohio.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crittenton Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Young Womens Christian Association Central Indiana. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WEIRTON CHRISTIAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds OHIO VALLEY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds BOARD OF PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION ↗
- Who funds HANCOCK COUNTY SHELTERED WORKSHOP INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds Ohio Valley Youth Network ↗
- Who funds VAGABOND MISSIONS ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CRITTENTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRI STATE UNITED SOCCER LTD ↗
- Who funds BLUE STREAM FARMS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HANCOCK COUNTY HUMANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds A CARING PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds STEUBENVILLE CULTURAL TRUST ↗
- Who funds REFUGE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds HILLTOP CHILDREN'S HOUSE ↗
- Who funds BROOKE HANCOCK FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds A CHILDS PLACE CASA LTD ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Esther N Simmons Charitable Trust · Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Hancock County Savings Charitable Foundation · Charles M Pugliese and Thelma M Pugliese Charitable Foundation · Mary Jane Brooks Charitable Trust · Robert H Reakirt Fdn Equities · Starvaggi Charities Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · Steel Valley Charities · Margaretta Churchman Char Trust · United Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc · Weirton United Way Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John C Williams Charitable Tr 8024 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.