· Private foundation
Landa Foundation Inc
Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
Read this first · the figures below need context
100% of Landa Foundation Inc’s FY2026 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2026 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2025, the last year Landa Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $61k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOUNDATION EKI | $22,000 |
| UMOJA PARTNERHIP INC | $15,000 |
| SEEDS | $8,000 |
| FOUNDATION BAKUVA | $7,000 |
| ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF INDIANAPOLIS | $5,500 |
| SERVANTS AT WORK | $2,000 |
| SAVE THE FAMILY | $1,000 |
| RESOURCES OF HOPE | $300 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 50% of grant dollars ($156k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 50% that went abroad ($154k) is mapped below.
Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Beyond the US: 50% of all-years giving ($154k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 14% of Landa Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.
13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down. Read against FY2025, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- ALAssistance League of Indianapolis Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +61%
- SSEEDS3× · 2022–2025 · $21k · revenue +33%
- UPUMOJA PARTNERSHIP INC2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +10%
Funded once
Indiana University Foundationone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +21%- MDMISIONERAS DEL SAGRADO CORAZONone grant, 2021 · $2k
- RCRILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $214
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.
The Foundation supports the Indiana Philanthropy Alliance, Inc. and its member community foundations through special initiatives that support or expand philanthropy in Indiana.
Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…
Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
To transform teaching and learning in the lowest-performing public schools so that every student, regardless of background, thrives.
By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
- Who funds Assistance League of Indianapolis Inc ↗
- Who funds SEEDS ↗
- Who funds UMOJA PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Servants at Work Inc ↗
- Who funds TRINITY FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE MENTORS FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds RESOURCES OF HOPE INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Landa Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Landa Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Landa’s filings →