Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lamm Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$141kEducation$73kHealth$71kReligion$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kHuman Services$3kInternational$3kCivil Rights$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$554k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$15,000
MORSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION FOUNDATION INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
JUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE (JCHAI)$2,500
FRENCHMAN'S CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION$2,300
BLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK$300
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$250
FURRY FRIENDS ANIMAL RESCUE$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $500 → 14%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%JUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $500 → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $118 → 22%MORSELIFE FOUNDATION: $850 → 11%MORSELIFE FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%MORSELIFE FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%MORSELIFE FOUNDATION: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
OR
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
KY
MD
NM
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$86k · 21 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +88% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
36

Total granted

$86k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+38%

Still filing today

48%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsInternationalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $31k · revenue +93%
  • FC
    FRENCHMANS CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +119%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    3× · 2018–2020 · $10k · revenue +195%

Funded once

  • ST
    SPILL THE HONEY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +38%
  • HH
    HARRITON HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc

JMCPG is committed to providing compassionate, personalized care from the region's most trusted team of physicians and health care professionals. Across the Palm Beaches and the Treasure Coast of Florida, JMCPG practice locations offer…

Health
2
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
3
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
9
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Jfk Medical Associates Pa

Jfk medical associates, p.a. is committed to excellence in providing quality and compassionate healthcare services to diverse communities.

Health
12
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Atlantic County Outlaws Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersDevelopmental Disabilities …Jewish Community FederationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionVolunteer Fire DepartmentsCancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Arts OrganizationsUnited Way FederationsFaith-Based Senior LivingFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%3%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr15%23%20–35yr9%26%35–55yr12%39%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr15%7%20–35yr9%20%35–55yr12%68%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/32
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/103,012

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
24/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $93,625 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INCJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $21,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIAFRENCHMANS CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC — $16,950 · PhilanthropyFRENCHMANS CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INCJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc — $15,000 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc+1 more — $500 · PhilanthropyTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $71,675 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY…+1 more — $175 · EducationJupiter Medical Center Inc — $30,600 · HealthJupiter Medical…THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $6,750 · HealthTHE SCRIPPS RES…THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $5,400 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S …+5 more — $1,185 · HealthUniversity of Michigan — $10,000 · OtherUniversity of …Individual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual gra…MORSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · OtherMORSE CHARITAB…NORTHERN PALM BEACH COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $4,500 · OtherNORTHERN PALM …JUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE (JCHAI) — $2,500 · OtherJUDITH CREED H…+39 more — $12,425 · Other+39 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,600 · Human ServicesMORSELIFE FOUNDATION INC — $2,100 · Human ServicesHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesJUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE — $500 · Human Services+1 more — $118 · Human ServicesISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC — $2,850 · InternationalRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $400 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$147,575Education$71,850Health$43,935Other$39,425Human Services$6,318International$2,850Arts & Culture$400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $93,625 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $71,675 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Inc — $30,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $21,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRENCHMANS CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC — $16,950 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $10,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $6,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $5,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC — $2,850 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMORSELIFE FOUNDATION INC — $2,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Palm Beach County Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER MEDICAL SERV CORPS OF LM & NAR — $385 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG ISRAEL OF MARGATE — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATED ALUMNI OF CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL OF PHILADELPHIA — $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH — $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES BLIND GOLF ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSIMON'S FUND — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFURRY FRIENDS ANIMAL RESCUE — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Inc
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds FRENCHMANS CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds MORSELIFE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds United Way of Palm Beach County Inc
  • Who funds HILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC
  • Who funds JUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE
  • Who funds RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER MEDICAL SERV CORPS OF LM & NAR
  • Who funds BLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lamm Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Young Israel of Margate3% of income from government
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc2% of income from government
  • United Way of Palm Beach County Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph