Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lamb Jane Charitable Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$305k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$358kArts & Culture$274kHealth$188kEducation$133kHuman Services$66kYouth Development$46kCommunity Improvement$21kFood & Nutrition$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $260k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF YOUNGSTOWN$110,000
1898 FOUNDATION$100,000
STAMBAUGH AUDITORIUM$50,000
PROJECT MKC$10,000
YOUNGSTOWN ST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
YOUNGSTOWN CITYSCAPE$5,000
BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART$5,000
THE RICH CENTER FOR AUTISM$5,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE$5,000
MAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $20k → 15%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$963k · 24 repeat orgs$165k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
12

Total granted

$963k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+5198%

Still filing today

46%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YS
    YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2025 · $115k · revenue +64%
  • PM
    PROJECT MKC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $46k · revenue +113%
  • OL
    OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $30k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • YM
    Y'TOWN MAHONING VALLEY UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • YO
    YMCA OF YOUNGSTOWN OHIO
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youngstown Area Jewish Foundation

To advance, promote and support the charitable purposes of the youngstown area jewish community board and the youngstown area jewish federation

Religion
2
Yountville Chamber of Commerce

Market the town of yountville and support local businesses with local events and operate visitor information center

—
3
Youngstown Warren Regional Chamber of Commerce Foundation

To operate for charitable purposes that exclusively benefit or carry out the charitable, educational and/or economic development purposes of the youngstown/warren regional chamber.

Community Improvement
4
Youngstown Area Jewish Cemeteries Association

To provide funeral and cemetery services for synagogue cemeteries.

Membership Benefit
5
Youngstownwarren Regional Chamber

To provide leadership and business services that promote the growth of our members and enhance the essential partnership between economic development and education to improve our quality of life.

—
6
Youngstown Columbiana Assn of Realt

To help organize and self-regulate those who deal with real estate in the mahoning and columbiana county areas of ohio.

—
7
The Falls of the Ohio Foundation

To inspire a sense of wonder in the falls of the ohio region through education, preservation, and exploration.

Environment
8
Lorain County Historical Society Inc

The lorain county historical society collects, preserves, and shares the history of lorain county, ohio to educate and inspire present and future generations.

—
9
Old Bedford Village Inc

Operation of historic village

—
10
Economic Action Group Incorporated

To solidify and accelerate downtown youngstown's resurgence as a center of employment, higher education, government services & culture, and to serve as a catalyst for overall economic development in the mahoning valley.

Community Improvement
11
York Land Trust

York Land Trust is a nonprofit organization that protects and cares for significant natural lands and waterways in the greater York Maine area for the benefit of the community and the environment.

Environment
12
Youngstown Area Jewish Federation

The mission of the youngstown area jewish federation is to sustain and enrich the quality of life for the jewish people regionally, in israel and worldwide. we are guided by the values of tzedkah (righteousness), klal yisrael (the…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youngstown State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Butler Institute of American Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF YOUNGSTOWN: $307,500 · OtherUNITED WAY OF YOUNGSTOWNAKRON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $153,334 · OtherAKRON CHILDRENS HOSPITALOH WOW THE ROGER AND GLORIA JONES: $30,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF YOUNGSTOWN: $25,000 · Other+21 more: $150,100 · Other+21 more1898 FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Arts & Culture1898 FOUNDATION INCHENRY H STAMBAUGH AUDITORIUM ASSOC: $70,000 · Arts & CultureHENRY H STAMBAUGH AUDITO…BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART: $30,000 · Arts & CultureBUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMER…YOUNGSTOWN SYMPHONY SOCIETY: $25,500 · Arts & CultureYOUNGSTOWN SYMPHONY SOCI…MAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $18,000 · Arts & CultureMAHONING VALLEY HISTORIC…YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $115,000 · EducationYOUNGSTOWN …PROJECT MKC: $46,000 · Youth DevelopmentOHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesYOUNGSTOWN CITYSCAPE INC: $7,500 · Community ImprovementTHE YOUNGSTOWN EDISON BUSINESS INCUBATOR: $7,500 · Community ImprovementYOUNGSTOWN ROTARY FOUNDATION IMA 7635002558: $5,000 · Community ImprovementMILL CREEK METROPARKS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsAKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Health
Other$665,934Arts & Culture$243,500Education$115,000Youth Development$46,000Human Services$30,000Community Improvement$20,000Recreation & Sports$5,000Health$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budget1898 FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetHENRY H STAMBAUGH AUDITORIUM ASSOC: $70,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetPROJECT MKC: $46,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetOHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN SYMPHONY SOCIETY: $25,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF YOUNGSTOWN: $25,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetMAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $18,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN CITYSCAPE INC: $7,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE YOUNGSTOWN EDISON BUSINESS INCUBATOR: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN ROTARY FOUNDATION IMA 7635002558: $5,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetAKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds 1898 FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HENRY H STAMBAUGH AUDITORIUM ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT MKC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART ↗
  • Who funds YOUNGSTOWN SYMPHONY SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF YOUNGSTOWN ↗
  • Who funds MAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds YOUNGSTOWN CITYSCAPE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNGSTOWN EDISON BUSINESS INCUBATOR ↗
  • Who funds MILL CREEK METROPARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNGSTOWN ROTARY FOUNDATION IMA 7635002558 ↗
  • Who funds AKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Mahoning ValleyOH30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Mahoning Valley · Premier Bank Foundation · John D Finnegan Fdn · Florence S Beecher Fdn · Fibushendricks Family Foundation · Youngstown Fdn General · E M Barr Tw Charitable Trust · Neckerman William M Jr Charitable · Frank & Pearl Gelbman Charitable Fdn · Charles E and Alice B Schmutz Charitable · Youngstown Area Jewish Federation · Youngstown Area Jewish Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lamb Jane Charitable Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lamb Jane Charitable Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lamb Jane Charitable Fdn?

    Find your warmest path to Lamb Jane Charitable Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lamb Jane Charitable Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph