Skip to content

· Private foundation

Laidig Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$217k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$709kInternational$142kYouth Development$140kCivil Rights$74kHuman Services$23kHealth$5kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIBLICA$200,000
INTERNATIONAL RESTORATION CHURCH$10,000
NAPPANEE MISSIONARY CHURCH$2,250
THE BRIDGE URBAN CHURCH$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,550
AGAPE FAITH FELLOWSHIP HOUSE$450
GRANGER COMMUNITY CHURCH$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $141k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%STUDIO TEN MINISTRIES: $100k → 10%STUDIO TEN MINISTRIES: $18k → 10%STUDIO TEN MINISTRIES: $9k → 10%Studio Ten Ministries: $8k → 10%STUDIO TEN MINISTRIES: $5k → 10%STUDIO TEN MINISTRIES: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WY
IN
CO
MO
SC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$966k · 12 repeat orgs$147k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +95% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

$966k
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
-2%

Still filing today

25%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BIBLICA INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $404k · revenue +80%
  • ST
    STUDIO TEN MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $141k · revenue +95%
  • TM
    TRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $140k · revenue +195%

Funded once

  • IF
    ILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -5%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • CC
    CROSS CONNECTING NETWORK
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Biblical Training Inc

International Biblical Training is a teaching, training and equipping religious ministry. IBT staff provide theological teaching and training for the purpose of making Christian disciples who in turn train and disciple others in…

Religion
2
Shine in the World Ministries

Shine exists to proclaim Jesus Christ to all lost peoples around the world, to mobilize the local church to embrace the Great Commission, and to equip the present and next generation of leaders in their spiritual quest and service to God…

International
3
Reconciliation Ministries International Inc

Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…

Religion
4
Bible Thinker Inc

Bible Thinker, Inc is a ministry dedicated to equipping people to think and live biblically. There are three main areas of teaching that we focus on:1. Teaching accurate theology based on exegeting the text of the Bible and confronting…

Religion
5
Talking Bibles International

The distribution of Talking Bibles worldwide in as many different languages as possible.

Religion
6
Shalom Ministries Internationa

SMI is a religious ministry. It conducts weekly TV and radio ministry. It also does itinerant religious teaching and music ministry and produces religious resources for churches and individuals.

Religion
7
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
8
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
9
Intentional Life Media

Dedicated to igniting personal transformation by affirming faith, inspiring hope, and equipping individuals, to live an intentional life in christ.

Religion
10
Cross to Light Corporation

Cross to Light is a nondenominational Christian organization providing spiritual education and physical aid to people in need around the world. Since 2005, Cross to Light has helped people cross from darkness to light by hearing the Gospel…

Religion
11
New Life International Christian Ministry Inc

Our mission is proclaiming the message of salvation through the saving power of the Holy Spirit to reach the unreached by evangelizing; motivating, mobilizing and organizing the body of Christ.

Religion
12
International Living Streams

To spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ by conducting conferences, training, teaching, and supporting ministries that serve others

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Insight for Living; the most unlike its peers is Cross Connecting Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIBLICA INC: $404,000 · ReligionBIBLICA INCTRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES INC: $140,000 · ReligionTRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES INC+4 more: $29,700 · ReligionGENDERSAVE: $73,500 · OtherGENDERSAVENAPPANEE MISSIONARY CHURCH: $64,050 · OtherNAPPANEE MISSIONARY CHURCHTHE BRIDGE URBAN CHURCH: $62,000 · OtherTHE BRIDGE URBAN CHURCHINTERNATIONAL RESTORATION CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL RESTORATION CHUR…CRU: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · Other+12 more: $31,811 · Other+12 moreSTUDIO TEN MINISTRIES INC: $141,000 · Human ServicesSTUDIO TEN MIN…ILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyILLUMINATI…LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $500 · International
Religion$573,700Other$297,361Human Services$141,000Philanthropy$100,000International$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIBLICA INC: $404,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSTUDIO TEN MINISTRIES INC: $141,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetTRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES INC: $140,000 over 3y, 9.1% of budgetILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDr James Dobson Family Institute: $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHISLIGHT INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $4,700 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetINSIGHT FOR LIVING: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BIBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds STUDIO TEN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Dr James Dobson Family Institute ↗
  • Who funds CROSS CONNECTING NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds HISLIGHT INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds INSIGHT FOR LIVING ↗
  • Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS13.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Laidig Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Laidig Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Laidig Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph