Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lafferty Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$433k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$92k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$604kReligion$535kInternational$203kYouth Development$141kEnvironment$119kHealth$116kHousing & Shelter$66kHuman Services$53kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $151k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $217k
$6,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Marquette University$92,300
Franciscan Sisters of Perpetual Adoration$75,000
Franciscan Missionary Sisters of Our Lady of Sorrows$50,000
Heifer International$30,000
The Sister Thea Bowman Foundation$25,000
Presbyterian Homes Foundation$25,000
King of Grace Lutheran$20,500
Nature Conservancy of New Hampshire$15,000
University of Dayton$15,000
Catholic Services Appeal Foundation of St Paul and Minneapolis$10,000
Smile Train$10,000
Nature Conservancy of Wisconsin$7,004
Apostles Lutheran Church & School$7,000
Angel City Pit Bulls$6,000
NAMI Glendale$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Enroot: $53k → 8%American National Red Cross: $5k → 14%Belknap House: $10k → 9%Enroot: $3k → 8%Imagine LA: $8k → 14%Belknap House: $3k → 9%Imagine LA: $6k → 14%Snack & Friends Inc: $3k → 17%Presbyterian Homes Foundation: $25k → 14%Imagine LA: $6k → 14%Presbyterian Homes Foundation: $10k → 14%Imagine LA: $3k → 14%Presbyterian Homes Foundation: $5k → 14%Imagine LA: $3k → 14%Presbyterian Homes Foundation: $5k → 14%Presbyterian Homes Foundation: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
AR
NC
DC
OK
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 33 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
21

Total granted

$1.7M
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+7%

Still filing today

58%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentAnimalsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marquette University
    5× · 2021–2025 · $528k · revenue +16%
  • PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +3%
  • ES
    East Side Basketball Club
    2× · 2023–2024 · $37k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • WI
    WELLSHARE INTERNATIONALgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +85%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • PR
    PLAY RUGBY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
3
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
7
Bigs & Littles Nyc Mentoring Inc

Bigs & littles nyc mentoring is a nonprofit community-based organization which transforms the lives of vulnerable nyc children and strengthens families through professionally guided one-to-one mentoring, life skills programming, and…

—
8
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education
9
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
10
Boys and Girls Clubs of Silicon Valley

To inspire and empower all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring adults.

Youth Development
11
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
12
Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc

Boys & girls clubs of boston (bgcb) stands as a transformative force in boston and chelsea, where high expectations unlock greatness. we believe that every young person who walks through our doors carries limitless potential. through our…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Play Rugby Inc; the most unlike its peers is Nami Glendale. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
22/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF PERPETUAL: $192,500 · OtherFRANCISCAN SISTERS OF PERPETUALFRANCISCAN MISSIONARY SISTERS OF OUR LADY OF SORROWS: $167,500 · OtherFRANCISCAN MISSIONARY SISTERS OF OUR LADY OF SORROWSHeifer International: $117,000 · OtherHeifer InternationalNature Conservancy of New Hampshire: $108,500 · OtherNature Conservancy of New HampshireKING OF GRACE LUTHERAN: $53,500 · OtherKING OF GRACE LUTHERANSMILE TRAIN INC: $35,250 · OtherCatholic Services Appeal Foundation of St Paul and Minneapolis: $35,000 · Other+30 more: $236,104 · Other+30 moreMarquette University: $528,000 · EducationMarquette UniversityUniversity of Dayton: $33,912 · EducationUniversity of Dayton+3 more: $9,400 · EducationENROOT INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesENROOT IN…PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTER…Imagine Los Angeles Inc: $24,500 · Human ServicesImagine L…KARE YOUTH LEAGUE: $15,500 · Human ServicesKARE YOUT…Belknap House: $13,000 · Human ServicesBelknap H…+2 more: $7,500 · Human ServicesWELLSHARE INTERNATIONAL: $75,000 · InternationalEast Side Basketball Club: $36,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $11,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE FOOTHILLS: $9,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNICORN THERAPEUTIC HORSEBACK RIDING INC: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentINDUSTRY SHERIFF'S YOUTH ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $38,000 · HealthANGEL CITY PIT BULLS: $12,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,000 · Animals
Other$945,354Education$571,312Human Services$165,500International$75,000Youth Development$68,000Health$38,000Animals$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarquette University: $528,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSHARE INTERNATIONAL: $75,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetENROOT INC: $55,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $38,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEast Side Basketball Club: $36,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $35,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $33,912 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDOOR OF HOPE: $28,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetImagine Los Angeles Inc: $24,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNAMI GLENDALE: $22,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetKARE YOUTH LEAGUE: $15,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALOIS ALZHEIMER FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetBelknap House: $13,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetANGEL CITY PIT BULLS: $12,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIME OF GRACE MINISTRY: $9,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE FOOTHILLS: $9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCAMBRIAN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPLAY RUGBY INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNICORN THERAPEUTIC HORSEBACK RIDING INC: $6,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDUSTRY SHERIFF'S YOUTH ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAVED ME INC: $3,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSPRING HILL COLLEGE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSNACK & FRIENDS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBENTLEY UNIVERSITY: $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWINNISQUAM WATERSHED NETWORK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTREEPEOPLE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds WELLSHARE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ENROOT INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds East Side Basketball Club ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Dayton ↗
  • Who funds DOOR OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Imagine Los Angeles Inc ↗
  • Who funds NAMI GLENDALE ↗
  • Who funds KARE YOUTH LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds ALOIS ALZHEIMER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Belknap House ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL CITY PIT BULLS ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds TIME OF GRACE MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE FOOTHILLS ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIAN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLAY RUGBY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNICORN THERAPEUTIC HORSEBACK RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds INDUSTRY SHERIFF'S YOUTH ATHLETIC LEAGUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thrivent Financial for LutheransMN11× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lafferty Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lafferty Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Bentley University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lafferty Family Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lafferty Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lafferty Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph